Experimental analysis of distortion of magnetoencephalography signals by the skull

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 230-238

  Okada, Yoshio C ^a   Lahteenmäki, Airi ^b   Xu, Chibing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomagnetism; Electroencephalography; Evoked magnetic field; Evoked potential; Magnetoencephalography; Neuromagnetism; Pig; Somatosensory cortex; Swine

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKULL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NOSE; REACTION TIME; SKULL; SWINE;

EID: 0032922361     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00099-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barth D.S., Sutherling W., Broffman J., Beatty J. Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 63:1986;260-273.
2. Breazile J.E., Swafford B.C., Thompson W.D. Study of the motor cortex of the domestic pig. Am. J. Vet. Res. 27:1966;1369-1373.
3. Buchanan, D.S., Crum, D.B., Cox, D. and Wikswo, J.P., Jr., MicroSQUID: A close-spaced 4 channel magnetometer. In: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink and M. Kotani (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York, 1989, pp. 677-679.
4. Campbell, A.W., 1905. Histological Studies on the Localization of Cerebral Function. University Press, Cambridge.
5. Craner S.L., Ray R.H. Somatosensory cortex of the neonatal pig: I. Topographical organization of primary somatosensory cortex (SI). J. Comp. Neurol. 306:1991;24-38.
6. Cuffin N.B., Cohen D. Magnetic fields produced by models of biological current sources. J. Appl. Phys. 48:1977;3971-3980.
7. Geselowitz D.B. On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal current sources. IEEE Trans. Magnet. 6:1970;346-347.
8. Grynszpan F., Geselowitz D.B. Model studies for the magnetocardiogram. Biophys. J. 13:1973;911-925.
9. Haueisen J., Ramon C., Eiselt M., Brauer H., Nowak H. Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44:1997;727-735.
10. Hämäläinen M.S., Sarvas J. Feasibility of the homogeneous head model in the interpretation of neuromagnetic fields. Phys. Med. Biol. 32:1987;91-97.
11. Hämäläinen M., Sarvas J. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:1989;165-171.
12. Kaufman L., Okada Y.C., Brenner D., Williamson S.J. On the relationship between somatic evoked fields and potentials. Int. J. Neurosci. 15:1981;223-239.
13. Meijs J.W.H., Bosch F.G.C., Peters M.J., Lopes da Silva F.H. On the magnetic field distribution generated by a dipolar current source situated in a realistically shaped compartment model of the head. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 66:1987;286-298.
14. Okada Y.C. Empirical bases for constraints in current-imaging algorithms. Brain Topogr. 5:1993;373-377.
15. Okada, Y.C., Lähteenmäki, A. and Xu, C. Comparison of MEG and EEG on the basis of somatic evoked responses elicited by stimulation of the snout in the juvenile swine. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1999, 110: 214-219.
16. Okada Y.C., Shah B., Huang J.-C. Ferromagnetic high-permeability alloy alone can provide sufficient low-frequency and eddy-current shieldings for biomagnetic measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 41:1994;688-697.
17. Okada Y.C., Wu J., Kyuhou S. Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 103:1997;474-485.
18. Plonsey, R., 1981. Generation of magnetic fields by the human body (theory). In: S.N., Erne, H.-D., Hählbohm and H. Lübbig, (Eds.), Biomagnetism. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 177-205.