The impact of alcohol and alcoholism among substance abuse journals

Alcohol and Alcoholism

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 25-34

  Jones, A W ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; DATA ANALYSIS; FINANCE; GENETICS; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLICATION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; WRITING;

ALCOHOLISM; BIBLIOMETRICS; HUMANS; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING;

EID: 0032922047     PISSN: 07350414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/34.1.25     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Biagioli, M. (1998) The instability of authorship: Credit and responsibility in contemporary biomedicine. FASEB Journal 12, 3-16.
2. Broad, W. J. (1978) Librarian turned entrepreneur makes millions off mere footnotes. Science 202, 833-857.
3. Chubin, D. E. and Hackett, E. J. (1990) Peerless Science. State University of New York Press, New York.
4. Cole, S. (1989) Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 14, 9-13.
5. Croll, R. P. (1984) The noncontributing author: An issue of credit and responsibility. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27, 401-407.
6. Culliton, B. J. (1988) Harvard tackles the rush to publish. Science 241, 525.
7. Drenth, J. P. H. (1998) Multiple authorship: The contribution of senior authors. Journal of the American Medical Association 280, 219-221.
8. Flanagin, A., Carey, L. A., Fontanarosa, P. B., Phillips, S. G., Pace, B. P., Lundberg, G. D. and Rennie, D. (1998) Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association 280, 222-226.
9. Fye, W. B. (1990) Medical authorship: Traditions, Trends, and Tribulations. Annals of Internal Medicine 113, 317-325.
10. Garfield, E. (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178, 471-479.
11. Garfield, E. (1976) Significant journals of science. Nature 264, 609-615.
12. Garfield, E. (1979) Citation Indexing; Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, pp. 1-274. Wiley, New York.
13. Garfield, E. (1983) How to use the science citation index (SCI). Current Contents, February 28th, 5-12.
14. Garfield, E. (1994) The application of citation indexing to journals management. Current Contents, 15th August, 3-5.
15. Garfield, E. (1996) How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal 313, 411-412.
16. Garfield, E. (1997) Dispelling a few common myths about journal citation impacts. The Scientist 11, 11-12.
17. Goodman, N. W. (1994) Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research. British Medical Journal 309, 1482.
18. Hansson, S. (1995) Impact factor as a misleading tool in the evaluation of medical journals. Lancet 346, 906.
19. Huth, E. J. (1986) Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Annals of Internal Medicine 104, 269-274.
20. Jones, A. W. (1996) Some thoughts and reflections on authorship. Alcohol and Alcoholism 31, 11-15.
21. Jones, A. W. (1998) Citation trends and practices in the Journal of Forensic Sciences as documented by ISI's Journal Citation Report. Journal of Forensic Science 43, 439-444.
22. King, J. (1987) A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science 13, 261-276.
23. MacRoberts, M. H. and MacRoberts, B. R. (1989) Citation analysis and the science policy arena. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 14, 8-12.
24. Metcalfe, N. B. (1995) Journal impact factors. Nature 376, 720.
25. Motta, G. (1995) Journal impact factors. Nature 376, 720.
26. Price, D. (1982) Multiple authorship. Science 212, 986.
27. Rennie, D. and Flanagin, A. (1994) Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. Journal of the American Medical Association 271, 469-471.
28. Rennie, D., Yank, V. and Emanuel, L. (1997) When authorship fails; A proposal to make contributors accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association 278, 579-585.
29. Seglen, P. O. (1989) From bad to worse; evaluation by journal impact. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 14, 326-327.
30. Seglen, P. O. (1994) Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45, 1-11.
31. Seglen, P. O. (1997a) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 314, 498-502.
32. Seglen, P. O. (1997b) Citation and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy 52, 1050-1056.
33. Shapiro, D. W., Wenger, N. S. and Shapiro, M. F. (1994) The contribution of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. Journal of the American Medical Association 271, 438-442.
34. Wessely, S. (1998) Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? Lancet 352, 301-305.
35. Wilcox, L. J. (1998) Authorship; The coin of the realm, the source of complaints. Journal of the American Medical Association 280, 216-217.
36. Williams, G. (1998) Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise. British Medical Journal 316, 1079-1082.