A demand theory for number of trips in a random utility model of recreation

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 357-367

  Parsons, George R ^a   Kealy, Mary Jo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000943080     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: 10960449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1995.1052     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. N. E. Bockstael, W. M. Hanemann, and C. L. Kling, Modeling recreational demand in a multiple site framework. Water Resour. Res. 23, 951-960 (1987).
2. N. E. Bockstael, W. M. Hanemann, and I. E. Strand, “Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Recreation Demand Models, ” report presented to the Environmental Protection Agency under Cooperative Agreement CR-811043-01-0, Washington, DC (1986).
3. M. Creel and J. Loomis, Recreation value of water to wetlands in the San Joaquin Valley: Linked multinomial logit and count data trip frequency models, Water Resour. Res. 28, 2597-2606 (1992).
4. P. Feather, D. Hellerstein, and T. Tomasi, A Discrete-Count Model of Recreational Demand, J. Environ. Econom. Management 29, 214-227 (1995).
5. C. A. Jones and Y. D. Sung, “Valuation of Environmental Quality at Michigan Recreational Fishing Sites: Methodological Issues and Policy Applications, ” EPA report, July 1991.
6. D. McFadden, Modeling the choice of residential location, in Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models” (A. Karlquist, L. Lundquist, F. Snikars, and J. W. Weibull, Eds.), North- Holland, Amsterdam (1978).
7. E. R. Morey, W. D. Shaw, and R. D. Rowe, A discrete-choice model of recreational participation, site choice, and activity valuation when complete trip data are not available. J. Environ. Econom. Management 20, 181-201 (1991).