CT angiography of common carotid artery bifurcation : Comparison between two techniques and conventional angiography
Castello M, Wilson J. CT angiography of common carotid artery bifurcation : comparison between two techniques and conventional angiography. Neuroradiology 1994 ; 36 : 602-4.
Carotid artery stenosis : A prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography
Cumming M, Morrow I. Carotid artery stenosis : a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. American Journal of Radiology 1994 ; 163 : 517-23.
Three dimensional Computed Tomographic angiography in the pre-operative evaluation of cerebro-vascular lesions
Herbaugh R, Schlusselberg D, Jeffry R et al. Three dimensional Computed Tomographic angiography in the pre-operative evaluation of cerebro-vascular lesions. Neurosurgery 1995 ; 36 : 320-7.
Carotid artery : Prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional Time of Flight MR-angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US
Huston J, Lewis B, Winbers D. Carotid artery : prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional Time of Flight MR-angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993 ; 186 : 334-9.
Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: Preliminary experience with Maximum Intensity Projection Spiral CT angiography
Marks M, Napel S, Jordan J et al. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with Maximum Intensity Projection Spiral CT angiography. American Journal of Radiology 1993 ; 160 : 1267-71.
Beneficial effect of carotid endoarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endoarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endoarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 1991 ; 325 : 445-53.
Spiral versus conventional CT in Routine Examination of the neck
Sprur J, Krahe T, Jung G et al. Spiral versus conventional CT in Routine Examination of the neck. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1995 ; 19 : 905-10.