Comparative analysis of day-to-day trip-chaining behavior of urban commuters in two cities

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1607, 1997, Pages 163-170

  Jou, Rong Chang ^a   Mahmassani, Hani S ^b  

^a FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000865311     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1607-22     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Rosenbloom, S. Peak-Period Traffic Congestion: A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Evaluation of Effective Solution. Transportation, Vol. 10, 1978, pp. 167-191.
2. Mahmassani, H., and G. L. Chang. Experiments with Departure Time Choice Dynamics of Urban Commuters. Transportation Research, Vol. 20B, 1986, pp. 297-320.
3. Mahmassani, H., and R. Herman. Interactive Experiments for the Study of Tripmaker Behavior Dynamics in Congested Commuting Systems. In Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (P. Jones, ed.), Avebury, Aldershot, United Kingdom, 1990, pp. 272-298.
4. Mahmassani, H., G. L. Chang, and R. Herman. Individual Decisions and Collective Effects in a Simulated Traffic System. Transportation Science, Vol. 18, 1986, pp. 362-384.
5. Mahmassani, H., S. Hatcher, and C. Caplice. Daily Variation of Trip Chaining, Scheduling, and Path Selection Behavior of Work Commuters. Methods for Understanding Travel Behavior in the 1990's. Proc., 6th International Conference on Travel Behavior, IATB, Vol. 2, Quebec, Canada, 1991, pp. 29-45.
6. Mannering, F. Poisson Analysis of Commuter Flexibility in Changing Routes and Departure Times. Transportation Research, Vol. 23B, 1989, pp. 53-60.
7. Jou, R. C., and H. Mahmassani. Comparability and Transferability of Commuter Behavior Characteristics Between Cities: Departure Time and Route Switching Decisions. In Transportation Research Record 1556, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 119-130.
8. Hanson, S. Urban-Travel Linkages: A Review. In Behavioural Travel Modelling (D. Henscher and P. Stopher, eds.), Croom Helm, London, 1979, pp. 81-100.
9. Harton, F., and P. Schuldiner. The Analysis of Land Use Linkages. In Highway Research Record 165, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1967, pp. 96-107.
10. Marble, D. A Simple Markovian Model of Trip Structures in a Metropolitan Region. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1964, pp. 150-156.
11. Wheeler, J. Trip Purpose and Urban Activity Linkages. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 62, 1972, pp. 641-654.
12. O'Kelly, M. A Model of the Demand for Retail Facilities Incorporating Multistop, Multipurpose Trips. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 13, 1981, pp. 134-148.
13. Adler, T., and M. Ben-Akiva. A Theoretical and Empirical Model of Trip Chaining Behavior. Transportation Research, Vol. 13B, 1979, pp. 136-150.
14. Horowitz, J. A Utility Maximizing Model of the Demand for Multi-destination Non-Work Travel. Transportation Research, Vol. 14B, 1980, pp. 369-386.
15. Oster, C. The Second Role of the Work Trip: Visiting Non-Work Destination. In Transportation Research Record 728, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1979, pp. 79-81.
16. Hanson, S. Spatial Diversification and Multi-Purpose Travel: Implications for Choice Theory. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 12, 1980, pp. 245-257.
17. Damm, D. Parameters of Activity Behavior for Use in Travel Analysis. Transportation Research, Vol. 16A, 1982, pp. 135-148.
18. Hatcher, S. Daily Variation of Trip Chaining, Departure Time, and Route Selection of Urban Commuters. Master's thesis. University of Texas at Austin, 1991.
19. Lerman, S., and S. Gonzalez. Poisson Regression Analysis Under Alternate Sampling Strategies. Transportation Science, Vol. 14, 1980, pp. 346-364.
20. Hatcher, S., and H. Mahmassani. Daily Variability of Route and Trip Scheduling Decisions for the Evening Commute. In Transportation Research Record 1357, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 72-81.