Functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis by Doppler derived absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in comparison with 99mTc MIBI SPECT

Heart

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 509-514

  Verberne, H J ^a   Piek, J J ^a   Van Liebergen, R A M ^b   Koch, K T ^b   Schroeder Tanka, J M ^b   Van Royen, E A ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

99mTc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography; Intracoronary Doppler; Relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0032829430     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.82.4.509     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 1 White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984;310:819-24.
2. 2 Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, et al. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 1976;53:627-32.
3. 3 Marcus ML, Skorton DJ, Johnson MR, et al. Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard". J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:882-5.
4. 4 Zijlstra F, Fioretti P, Reiber JHC, et al. Which cineangiographically assessed anatomic variable correlates best with functional measurements of stenosis severity? A comparison of quantitative analysis of the coronary cineangiogram with measured coronary flow reserve and exercise/ redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:686-91.
5. 5 Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Cosgrove DM, et al. Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims data base. Circulation 1993;87:1489-97.
6. 6 Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:459-74.
7. 7 Doucette JW, Corl D, Payne HM, et al. Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation 1992;85:1899-911.
8. 8 Miller DD, Donohue TJ, Younis LT, et al. Correlation of pharmacological 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses. Circulation 1994;89:2150-60.
9. 9 Joye JD, Schulman DS, Lasorda D, et al. Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:940-7.
10. 10 Tron C, Donohue TJ, Bach RG, et al. Comparison of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve with poststenotic coronary flow velocity reserve for prediction of stress myocardial perfusion imaging results. Am Heart J 1995;130: 723-33.
11. 11 Deychak YA, Segal J, Reiner JS, et al. Doppler guide wire flow-velocity indexes measured distal to coronary stenoses associated with reversible thallium perfusion defects. Am Heart J 1995;129:219-27.
12. 12 McGinn AL, White CW, Wilson RF. Interstudy variability of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1990;81:1319-30.
13. 13 Hoffman JIE. A critical view of coronary reserve. Circulation 1987;75(suppl 1):I-6-11.
14. 14 Klocke FJ. Measurements of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care. Circulation 1987;76:1183-9.
15. 15 Heller LI, Cates C, Popma J, et al. Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease. Circulation 1997;96:484-90.
16. 16 Uren NG, Crake T, Lefroy DC, et al. Delayed recovery of coronary resistive vessel function after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:612-21.
17. 17 van Liebergen RAM, Piek JJ, Koch KT, et al. Immediate and long-term effect of balloon angioplasty or stent implantation on the absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve. Circulation 1998;98:2133-40.
18. 18 Wilson RF, Johnson MR, Marcus ML, et al. The effect of coronary angioplasty on coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1988;77:873-85.
19. 19 Gould KL. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:267-78.
20. 20 Okada RD, Glover D, Gaffney T, et al. Myocardial kinetics of technetium-99m-hexakis-2-methoxy-2-methylpropylisonitrile. Circulation 1988;78:491-8.
21. 21 Baumgart D, Haude M, Goerge G, et al. Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve. Circulation 1998;98:40-6.
22. 22 Rozeman Y, Gilon D, Zelingher J, et al. One-stage coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:30-3.
23. 23 Kern MJ, Donohue TJ, Aguirre FV, et al. Clinical outcome of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal translesional pressure-flow velocity measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:178-87.
24. 24 Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Kiat H, et al. Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:639-47.
25. 25 Hoffman JIE. Maximal coronary flow and the concept of coronary vascular reserve. Circulation 1984;70:153-9.
26. 26 Foley JB, Watson KR, Chisholm RJ. Impact of coronary angioplasty on coronary vasodilator response of normal nondilated coronary arteries in patients with stable angina. Am J Cardiol 1997;75:1070-1.
27. 27 Miller DD, Verani MS. Current status of myocardial perfusion imaging after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:260-6.