Rest and exercise Doppler hemodynamics of the medtronic intact aortic bioprosthesis

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 530-535

  Strike, Philip C ^a,b   Balanescu, Serban A ^a   Gardiner, Diane ^a   Livesey, Steven A ^a   Simpson, Iain A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b HOMERTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EXERCISE TEST; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REST; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0032828716     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Milano A, Bortolotti V, Talenti E, et al. Calcific degeneration as the main cause of porcine bioprosthetic valve failure. Am J Cardiol 1983;53:1066-1070
2. Broom ND, Thomson FJ. Influence of fixation conditions on the performance of glutaraldehyde treated porcine aortic valves: Towards a more scientific basis. Thorax 1979;4:166-176
3. Talman EA, Boughner DR. Glutaraldehyde fixation alters the internal shear properties of porcine aortic heart valve tissue. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S369-S373
4. Christie GW. Anatomy of aortic heart valve leaflets: The influence of glutaraldehyde fixation on function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6(suppl.1):S25-S33
5. Vesely I. Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of 'zero-pressure fixation'. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:90-99
6. Vesely I, Lozon A, Talman E. Is zero pressure fixation of bioprosthetic valves truly stress free? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:288-298
7. Barratt-Boyes BG, Ko PH, Jaffe WM. The zero pressure fixed Medtronic Intact porcine valve: Clinical results over a 6-year period, including serial echocardiographic assessment. J Card Surg 1991;6:606-612
8. Lemieux MD, Jamieson WRE, Landymore RW, et al. Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance to seven years. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S258-S263
9. Munro AI, Jamieson WRE, Tyers FO, Burr LH. The Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance to eight years. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:634-640
10. Barratt-Boyes BG, Jaffe WM, Ko PH, Whitlock RML. The zero pressure fixed Medtronic Intact porcine valve: An 8.5-year review. J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2:604-611
11. O'Brien MF, Stafford EG, Gardner MAH, et al. The Medtronic Intact xenograft: An analysis of 342 patients over a seven-year follow up period. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S253-S257
12. Vermeulen F, Bennink G, Jaarsma X, et al. The Intact porcine bioprosthesis: Early world wide clinical experience and analysis of a single institution's experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6(suppl.1):S124-S127
13. Barratt-Boyes BG. Clinical experience with the zero pressure fixed Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6(suppl.1):S79-S81
14. Jaffe WM, Barratt-Boyes BG, Sadri A, et al. Early follow up of patients with the Medtronic Intact porcine valve. A new cardiac bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:181-192
15. DePaulis R, Sommariva L. Russo F, et al. Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic annulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57-62
16. Tatineni S, Barner HB, Pearson AC, Halbe D, Woodruff R, Labovitz AJ. Rest and exercise evaluation of the St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular function. Circulation 1989;80(suppl.I):I-16-I-23
17. Gardin JM, Kozlowski J, Dabestani A, et al. Studies of Doppler aortic flow velocity during supine bicycle exercise. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:327-332
18. Van Rugge FP, van der Wall EE, Bruschke AVG. New developments in pharmacological stress imaging. Am Heart J 1992;124:468-485
19. Marwick T. Current status of non invasive techniques for the diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia. Acta Clin Belg 1992;47:1-5
20. Dolan MS, Castello R, St. Vrain JA, et al. Quantitation of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography: A practical approach. Am Heart J 1995;129:1014-1020
21. Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, et al. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler Color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:952-959
22. Ricou F, Brun A, Terch R. Haemodynamic comparison of Medtronic Intact bioprostheses and bileaflet mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Cardiology 1996;78:212-215
23. Levine FH, Carter JE, Buckley MJ, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock and Carpentier Edwards bioprostheses. Circulation 1981;64(2 part 2):192-195
24. Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Gil CC, et al. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;89:358-368
25. Bove EL, Marvesti MA, Potts JL, et al. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21mm Ionescu Shiley and Carpentier Edwards porcine valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:750-755
26. Rossiter SJ, Miller DC, Stinson EB, et al. Haemodynamic and clinical comparison of the Hancock modified orifice and standard orifice bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;80:54-60
27. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis haemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6(suppl.1):S34-S38
28. Kadir I, Izzat MB, Wilde P, et al. Dynamic evaluation of the 21 mm Medtronic Intact aortic bioprosthesis by dobutamine echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1128-1132
29. Burwash IG, Pearlman AS, Kraft CD, et al. Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1342-1350
30. Burwash IG, Thomas DD, Sadahiro M, et al. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvar volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1994;89:827-835