Hemodynamic comparison of medtronic intact bioprostheses and bileaf let mechanical prostheses in aortic position?

Cardiology (Switzerland)

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 212-215

  Ricou, F ^a   Brim, A ^a   Lerch, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Aortic valve; Bioprosthesis; Doppler echocardiography; Mechanical prosthesis; Medtronic Intact; Pressure gradients

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE;

EID: 0029869685     PISSN: 00086312     EISSN: 14219751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000177089     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Yoganathan AP, Chaux A, Gray R, Woo YR, DcRohertis M. Williams F, Maltof TJ: Bilcaflcl, tilling dise and porcine aortic valve substitutes: In vitro hydrodynamic characteristics. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984:3:313-320.
2. Manie DD, Harrison EC, Yoganathan AP, Allen DT, Corcoran WH: In vitro flow dynamics of four prosthetic aortic valves: A comparative analysis. J Biomech 1989:22:597-607.
3. Fisher J. Reece IJ, Wheatley DJ: In vitro evaluation of six mechanical and six bioprosthetic valves. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986:34:157-162.
4. Gray R. Chaux A. Maltoff J. DeRobertis M. Raymond M. Stewart M. Yoganathan AP: Bileaflet. Tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: In vivo hydrodynamic characteristics. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:321-327.
5. Ramirez ML. Wong M. Sadler N. Sahn PM: Doppler evaluation of bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valves: Data from four models in 107 stable, ambulatory patients. Am Heart J 1988:115:428-435.
6. Khuri SF. Foiland ED. Sethi GK. et al: Six month postoperative hemodynamics of the Hancock heterograft and the Bjork-Shiley prosthesis: Results of the Veteran Administration cooperative prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988:12:8-18.
7. Maync A. Christie GW. Smaill BH. Hunter PJ. Barratt-Boyes BG: An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflet from four second generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:170-180.
8. Etienne Y. Jobic Y. Genet L. Barra JA. Bosehat J. Gilard M, Penthcr P. Blanc J.I: Doppler échocardiographie evaluation of normal Medtronic Intact aortic bioprosthetic valves. Arch Mal Coeur 1990:83:2039-2044.
9. Jaffe WM. Coverdale HA, Roche AH. Whitlock RM, Neutze JM. Barratt-Boyes BG: Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 allograft. Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990:100:167-174.
10. Jaffe WM. Barratt-Boyes BG, Sadri A, Gavin JB. Coverdale HA. Neutze JM: Early follow-up of patients with the Medtronic Intact porcine valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989:98:181-192.
11. Lemieux M, Dumesnil JG. Dowd C: A new' porcine bioprosthesis: Design rational and early clinical experience. Can J Cardiol 1988:4: 322-327.
12. Mullany CJ. Schaft HV, Orszulak TO, Miller FA: Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the aortic Intact porcine bioprosthesis. J Hean Valve Dis 1994;3:641-647.
13. Munro AI, Jamieson WRE. Tycrs GOF, Burr LH: The Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance to eight years. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:634-640.
14. Dumesnil JG. Honos GN. Lemieux NM. Beau-chemin J: Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990:16:637-643.
15. Habib G. Bénichou M, Gisbcrt MP. Bonnet JL, Sccmama J, Djiane P, Bory M, Serradimigni A: Doppler échocardiographie evaluation of normal and pathological aortic valve prosthescs. Arch Mal Coeur 1990;83:937-945.