The effect of target proximity on the aniso-accommodative response

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 376-392

  Marran, Lynn ^a   Schor, Clifton M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINA; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRAINING; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0032824902     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00452.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Campbell F.W., Westheimer G. Dynamics of accommodation responses of the human eye. J. Physiol. 151:1960;285-295.
2. Ciuffreda K., Hokoda S.C. Effect of instruction and higher level control on the accommodative response spatial frequency profile. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 5:(2):1985;221-223.
3. Ganrud, C. E. (1998). Infants' sensitivity to pictorial depth cues, International Conference on Infant Studies, Washington, D.C.
4. Gwiazda J.E., Bauer J.A., Thorn F., Held R. Myopic children can effectively use blur cues to relax but not to increase accommodation. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 35:(Suppl.):1994;1806.
5. Hirsch, M. J. and Weymouth, F. W. 1991. Prevalence of Refractive Anomalies. In Grosvenor T, Flom MC (Eds.) Refractive Anomalies: Research and Clinical Applications. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 15-38.
6. Hofstetter H. The proximal factor in accommodation and convergence. Am. J. Optom. 19:1942;67-76.
7. Kotulak J., Schor C. The accommodative response to subthreshold blur and to perceptual fading during the Troxler phenomenon. Perception. 15:1986;7-15.
8. Laird, I. (1991). Anisometropia. ed. T. Grosvenor and M. C. Flom. In: Refractive Anomalies: Research and Clinical Applications, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 174-198.
9. Marran L., Schor C.M. Lens induced aniso-accommodation. Vision Res. 38:(22):1998;3601-3619.
10. Rosenfield M., Gilmartin B. Effect of target proximity on the open-loop accommodative response. Optom. Vis. Sci. 67:1991;74-79.
11. Rosenfield M., Ciuffreda K.J., Ong E., Azimi A. Proximally induced accommodation and accommodative adaptation. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 31:(6):1990;1162-1167.
12. Scheiman, M. and Wick, B. (1994). Clinical Management of Binocular Vision, Philadelphia: Lippincott.
13. Tucker J., Charman W. Reaction and response times for accommodation. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 56:(8):1979;490-503.
14. Yonas, A., Pettersen, L. and Granrud, C. E. (1982). Infants' sensitivity to familiar size as information for distance, Child Development Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.