Lens induced aniso-accommodation

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 22, 1998, Pages 3601-3619

  Marran, Lynn ^a   Schor, Clifton M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Anisometropia; Binocular; Development; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANISOMETROPIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENSES; MALE; OPTICS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0031669317     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00064-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Campbell FW. Correlation of accommodation between the two eyes. J Optic Soc Am 1960;50(7):738.
2. Hung G, Semmlow J. Static behavior of accommodation and vergence: Computer simulation of an interactive dual-feedback system. IEE Trans Biomed Eng 1980;27:439-47.
3. Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ, Hammer S. Interocular equality of tonic accommodation and consensuality of accommodative hysteresis. Ophthal Physiol Optics 1987;7:17-20.
4. Ball E, A study in consensual accommodation, Am J Optometry Arch Am Acad Optom 1952;561-574.
5. Hokoda S, Ciuffreda K. Measurement of accommodative amplitude in amblyopia. Ophthal Physiol Optics 1982;2:205-12.
6. Ogle KN, Relative sizes of ocular images of the two eyes in asymmetric convergence. Arch Ophthal 1937;1046-1061.
7. Spencer RW, Wilson WK. Accommodative response in asymmetric convergence, Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1954;498-503.
8. Rosenberg R, Flax N, Brodsky B, Abelman L. Accommodative levels under conditions of asymmetric convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1953;244-254
9. Stoddard KB, Morgan MW. Monocular accommodation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1942;460-465.
10. Morgan MW. Analysis of clinical data. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1944;21:477-91.
11. Bennet AG, Edgar DF. Spectacle lens design and performance. Optician, 1979.
12. Smith G, Bailey IL. Aspheric spectacle lenses: Introduction. Optician 1981;181:21-6.
13. Garner LF. Mechanism of acoomadation and refractive error. Opthalmol Physiol Optics 1983;3(3):287-293.
14. Crane H, Steele C. Accurate three dimensional Eyetracker. Applied Optics 1978;17:691-705.
15. Cornsweet T, Crane H. Servo-controlled infrared optometer. J Optic Soc Am 1970;60:548-54.
16. McBrien N, Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient. Ophthal Physiol Optics 1986;6:145-9.
17. Flitcroft D, Judge S, Morley J. Binocular interactions in accommodation control: effects of anisometropic stimuli. J Neurosci 1992;12:188-203.
18. Liebowitz HW, Owens DA. New evidence for the intermediate position of relaxed accomadation. Doc Opthalmol 1978;46(1):133-147.
19. Miller RJ. Temporal stability of the dark focus of accommodation. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1978;55(7):447-50.
20. Schor C, Tsuetaki T. Fatigue of accommodation and vergence changes their cross-link interactions. Inv Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1987;28(103).
21. Rosenfield, Ciuffreda, Hung, Gilmartin Tonic accommodation: a review I. Basic aspects. Ophthalmol Physiol Optics 1993;13:266-284.
22. Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda K. Effect of surround propinquity on the open-loop accommodative response. Inv Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1991;32(1):142-7.
23. Borish IM. Clinical Refraction 3rd ed. Chicago: Professional Press, 1970:910.
24. Levy NS, Glick EB. Stereoscopic perception and Snellen visual acuity. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:722-4.
25. Westheimer G, McKee SP. Stereoscopic acuity with defocused and spatially filtered retinal images. J Optic Soc Am 1980;70:772-8.
26. Zonis S, Miller B. Refractions in the Israeli newborn. J Pediatr Opthalmol 1974;11(2):77-81.
27. Ingram R, Walker C. Refraction as a means of predicting squint or amblyopia in preschool siblings of children known to have these defects. Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63:238-42.
28. Flom M, Bedell H. Identifying amblyopia using associated conditions, acuity and non-acuity features. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1985;62:153-60.
29. Hung L, Crawford M, Smith E. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nat Med 1995;1(8):761-5.
30. Hendrickson P, Rosenblum W. Accommodation demand and deprivation in kitten ocular development. Inv Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1985;26:343-9.
31. VanAlphen GMWH. Choroidal stress and emmetropization. Vision Res 1986;26(5):723-34.
32. Schaeffel F, Howland HC. Mathematical model of emmetropization in the chicken. J Optic Soc Am 1988;5:2080-6.
33. Kiely P, Crewther S, Nathan J, Brennan N, Effron N, Madigan M. A comparison of ocular development of the cynomolgus monkey and man. Clin Vis Sci 1987;1:269-80.
34. Tanlami T, Goss D. Prevalence of monocular amblyopia among anisometropia. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1979;56:704-15.
35. Westheimer G, Blair S. The parasympathetic pathways to internal eye muscles. Invest Ophthalmol 1973;12:193-7.
36. Jampel R, Mindel J. The nucleus for accommodation in the midbrain of the macaque. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1967;6:40-50.