Stock dynamics and adaptive management of habitat: An evaluation based on simulations

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 329-341

  Williams, John G ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISHERY MANAGEMENT; HABITAT RESTORATION; MORTALITY; POPULATION MODELING; RECRUITMENT;

CALIFORNIA; SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; PISCES;

EID: 0032815856     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<0329:SDAAMO>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adams, S. M. 1990. Status and use of biological indicators for evaluating the effects of stress on fish. Pages 1-8 in S. M. Adams, editor. Biological indicators of stress in fish. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 8, Bethesda, Maryland.
2. Beverton, R. J. H., and S. J. Holt. 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Investigations, Series II, Marine Fisheries, Great Britain Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 19:1-533.
3. Boydstun, L. B. 1994. Analysis of two mark-recapture methods to estimate the fall chinook salmon, On-corhynchus tshawytscha, run into Bogus Creek, upper Klamath River, California. California Fish and Game 80:1-3.
4. CALFED Bay-Delta Program. 1998. Programatic environmental impact statement/environmental impact report. CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, California.
5. Castleberry, D. T., J. J. Cech, Jr., M. K. Saiki, and B. A. Martin. 1991. Growth, condition, and physiological performance of juvenile salmonids from the lower American River: February through July, 1991. Report of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland, California.
6. Castleberry, D. T, J. J. Cech, Jr., M. K. Saiki, and B. A. Martin. 1993. Growth, condition, and physiological performance of juvenile salmonids from the lower American River: February through July, 1992. Report of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland, California.
7. Castleberry, D. T., and eleven coauthors. 1996. Uncertainty and instream flow standards. Fisheries 21(8): 20-21.
8. Christensen, N. L., and twelve coauthors. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6:665-691.
9. CMARP (Comprehensive Monitoring, Assessment, and Research Program). 1998. A proposal for the development of a comprehensive monitoring, assessment, and research program. CMARP report to California-Federal Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, California.
10. Elliott, J. M. 1993. A 25-year study of production of juvenile sea-trout, Salmo trutta, in an English Lake District stream. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 118:109-122.
11. Elliott, J. M. 1994. Quantitative ecology and the brown trout. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
12. Goldsmith, G. H. 1993. Klamath River fisheries assessment program, juvenile salmonid monitoring on the Trinity and Klamath rivers, 1991. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Coastal California Fishery Resource Office, Arcata, California.
13. Hankin, D. G. 1986. Examination of methods and statistical analysis in EBMUD exhibits concerning the relative contribution of hatcheries and natural production to the populations of chinook salmon in the lower American River. Report to McDonough, Holland and Allen, Sacramento, California.
14. Healey, M.C. 1982. Catch, escapement and stockrecruitment for British Columbia chinook salmon since 1951. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1107.
15. Healey, M. C., and five coauthors. 1998. Stategic plan for the ecosystem restoration plan. CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, California.
16. Hennessey, T. M. 1994. Governance and adaptive management of estuarine ecosystems: the case of Chesapeake Bay. Coastal Management 22:119-145.
17. Hilborn, R., and M. Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
18. Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, London.
19. Holling, C. S. 1996. Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people. Ecological Applications 6:733-736.
20. Jones, M. L., and six coauthors. 1996. Assessing the ecological effects of habitat change: moving beyond productive capacity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Supplement):446-457.
21. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper-Collins, New York.
22. Law, P. W. 1994. A simulation study of salmon carcass survey by capture-recapture method. California Fish and Game 80:14-28.
23. Lawson, P W. 1993. Cycles in ocean productivity, trends in habitat quality, and the restoration of salmon runs in Oregon. Fisheries 18(8):6-10.
24. Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
25. Ludwig, D., and C. J. Walters. 1985. Are age-structured models appropriate for catch and effort data? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42:1066-1072.
26. Mangel, M. and 41 others. 1996. Principles for the conservation of wild living resources. Ecological Applications 6:338-362.
27. Nestler, J. M., R. T. Milhous, and J. R. Layzer. 1989. Instream habitat modeling techniques. Pages 295-315 in J. A. Gore and G. E. Petts, editors. Alternatives in regulated river management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
28. Osenberg, C. W., R. J. Schmitt, S. J. Holbrook, K. E. Abu-Saba, and A. R. Flegal. 1994. Detection of environmental impacts: natural variability, effect size, and power analysis. Ecological Applications 4:16-30.
29. Pearcy, W. G. 1996. Salmon production in changing ocean domains. Pages 331-352 in D. J. Stouder, P. A. Bisson, and R. J. Naiman, editors. Pacific salmon and their ecosystem: status and future options. Chapman and Hall, New York.
30. Peterman, R. M., and M. J. Bradford. 1987. Statitical power of trends in fish abundance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44:1879-1889.
31. Rein, S. R. 1993. A model of chinook salmon population dynamics. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
32. Reisenbichler, R. R. 1986. Use of spawner-recruit relationships to evaluate the effect of degraded environment and increased fishing on the abundance of fall-run chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawyts-cha, in several California streams. Doctoral dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle.
33. Ricker, W. E. 1954. Stock and recruitment. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 11:559-623.
34. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 191.
35. Roper, B. R. 1995. Ecology of anadromous salmonids within the upper South Umpqua basin, Oregon. Doctoral dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow.
36. Schaefer, M. B. 1951. Estimation of the size of animal populations by marking experiments. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin 52:189-203.
37. Seber, G. A. F. 1982. The estimation of animal populations, 2nd edition. MacMillan, New York.
38. Snider, B., and R. G. Titus. 1995. Lower American River emigration survey, November 1993-July 1994. California Department of Fish and Game, Environmental Services Division, Sacramento.
39. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969. Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.
40. Unwin, M. J. 1997. Fry-to-adult survival of natural and hatchery-produced chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from a common origin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:1246-1254.
41. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995a. Draft anadro-mous fish restoration plan: a plan to increase natural production of anadromous fish in the Central Valley of California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California.
42. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995b. Work paper: habitat restoration actions to double natural production of anadromous fish in the Central Valley of California, volume 2, May 9, 1995. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the direction of the Anadromous Fish Restoration Program Core Group, Stockton, California.
43. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996. Comprehensive assessment and monitoring program (CAMP) final conceptual plan. Prepared by Central Valley Fish and Wildlife Restoration Program Office, Sacramento, California. Prepared with technical assistance from Montgomery Watson, Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. (JSA 95-104), and CH2M Hill, Sacramento, California.
44. Walters, C. J. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. Macmillan, New York.
45. Walters, C. J. 1997. Information requirements for salmon management. Pages 61-68 in J. D. Strouder, P. A. Bisson, and R. J. Naiman, editors. Pacific salmon and their ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, New York.
46. Walters, C. J., and R. Hilborn. 1976. Adaptive control offishing systems. Journal ofthe Fisheries Research Board of Canada 33:145-159.
47. Walters, C. J., and D. Ludwig. 1981. Effects of measurement errors on the assessment of stock-recruit relationships. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:704-710.
48. Williams, J. G., editor. 1997. Workshop on instream flow standards, University of California-Davis, April 7, 1995. University of California, Centers ofWaterand Wildlands Resources, Water Resources Center Report 89, Davis.