Adopting automated negotiation

Technology in Society

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 167-174

  Blecherman, Barry ^a  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Negotiation; Power

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0032814504     PISSN: 0160791X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-791X(99)00004-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Jelassi MT, Faroughi A. A negotiation support system: An overview of design issues and existing software [special issue on group decision support systems] Decision Support Systems 1989;5:167-81.
2. Rangaswamy A, Shell GR. Using computers to realize joint gains in negotiations: toward an electronic bargaining table. Management Science 1997;43:1147-63.
3. Sycara KP. Machine learning for intelligent support of conflict resolution. Decision Support Systems 1993;10:121-36.
4. Oliver J. A machine-learning approach to automated negotiations and prospects for electronic commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems 1996-7;13:83-112.
5. Dwyer RF, Walker OC. Bargaining in an asymmetrical power structure. Journal of Marketing 1981;45:104-15.
6. Gupta S. Modeling integrative multiple issue bargaining. Management Science 1989;35:788-806.
7. Neale MA, Bazerman MH. Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation. New York: The Free Press, 1991.
8. Sebenius JK. Negotiation analysis: a characterization and review. Management Science 1992;38:18-38.
9. Fisher R, Ury W, Patton B. Getting to yes. 2nd ed. New York: Penguin Books, 1991.
10. Lewicki RJ, Saunders DM, Minton JW. Essentials of Negotiation. Chicago: Irwin, 1994:182-90.
11. Blecherman B. Participation constraints on the adoption of fully automated negotiations. 1998 Best Papers, Proceedings of the Fifty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 1998.
12. Daft RL. Management, 3rd ed. Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press, 1994.
13. Daft RL, Lengel RH. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 1986;32:554-71.
14. Daft RL, Trevino LK. Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: implication for information systems. MIS Quarterly 1987;11:355-68.
15. Sproull L, Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 1986;32:1492-512.
16. Lee AS. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: an empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quarterly 1994;18:143-57.
17. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Structuring and analyzing values for multiple-issues negotiations. In: Young, editor. Negotiation analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1991.
18. Clemons EK, Weber BW. Restructuring institutional block trading: an overview of the OptiMark system. Proceedings of the 31st Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 1998.
19. Raiffa H. Post-settlement settlement. Negotiation Journal 1985;1:9-12.