Intraspecific phylogeny analysis using ITS sequences: Insights from studies of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (Cruciferae)

Systematic Botany

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 47-61

  Mayer, Michael S ^a   Soltis, Pamela S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; ELECTROPHORESIS; HAPLOTYPE; INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER REGION; INTROGRESSION; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENETICS;

STREPTANTHUS GLANDULOSUS;

EID: 0032795211     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419385     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AVISE, J. C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. London: Chapman and Hall.
2. _, J. ARNOLD, R. M. BALL, E. BERMINGHAM, T. LAMB, J. E. NEIGEL, C. A. REEB, and N. C. SAUNDERS. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 489-522.
3. BALDWIN, B. G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: An example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 3-16.
4. _. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of Calycadenia (Compositae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: chromosomal and morphological evidence reexamined. American Journal of Botany 80: 222-238.
5. _ and R. H. ROBICHAUX. 1995. Historical biogeography and ecology of the Hawaiian silversword alliance: new molecular phylogenetic perspectives. In Hawaiian Biogeography: Evolution on a Hot Spot Archipelago, eds. W. L. Wagner and V. A. Funk. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
6. _, M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 82: 247-277.
7. BARTON, N. H. and I. WILSON. 1996. Genealogies and geography. Pp. 23-56 in New uses for new phylogenies, eds. P. H. Harvey, A. J. L. Brown, J. M. Smith, and S. Nee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. BUCKLER, E. S., A. IPPOLITO, and T. P. HOLTSFORD. 1997. The evolution of ribosomal DNA: Divergent paralogues and phylogenetic implications. Genetics 145: 821-832.
9. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFEORD, and P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 384-397.
10. CAMPBELL, C. S., M. F. WOJEICHOWSKI, B. T. BALDWIN, L. A. ALICE, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1997. Persistent nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence polymorphism in the Amelanchier (Rosaceae) agamic complex. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14:81-90.
11. CHIPPINDALE, P. T. and J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 43: 278-287.
12. CRANDALL, K. A. and A. R. TEMPLETON. 1996. Applications of intraspecific phylogenetics. Pp. 81-99 in New Uses for New Phylogenies, eds. P. H. Harvey, A. J. L. Brown, J. M. Smith, and S. Nee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Systematic Biology 46: 464-478.
14. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE, and J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 657-681.
15. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Botany 17: 144-163.
16. _. 1995. The irrelevance of allele tree topologies for species delimitation, and a non-topological alternative. Systematic Botany 20: 574-588.
17. _. 1997. Trees within trees: genes and species, molecules and morphology. Systematic Biology 46: 537-553.
18. HICKMAN, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19. HILLIS, D. M. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. Pp. 278-294 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences, eds. M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. _ and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
21. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1991. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology 40: 257-270.
22. _, J. J. BULL, and C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 152-157.
23. KIM, Y.-D. and R. K. JANSEN. 1996. Phylogenetic implications of rbcL and ITS sequence variation in the Berberidaceae. Systematic Botany 21: 381-396.
24. KRUCKEBERG, A. R. 1957. Variation in fertility of hybrids between isolated populations of the serpentine species, Streptanthus glandulosus Hook. Evolution 11: 185-211.
25. _. 1958. The taxonomy of the species complex, Streptanthus glandulosus Hook. Madroño 14: 217-227.
26. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
27. _. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523-536.
28. MANOS, P. S. 1997. Systematics of Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae) based on rDNA spacer sequences (ITS): taxonomic congruence with morphology and plastid sequences. American Journal of Botany 84: 1137-1155.
29. MAYER, M. S. and P. S. SOLTIS. 1994. The evolution of serpentine endemics: A cpDNA phylogeny of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (Cruciferae). Systematic Botany 19: 557-574.
30. _, _, and D. E. SOLTIS. 1994. The evolution of the Streptanthus glandulosus complex (Cruciferae): Genetic divergence and gene flow in serpentine endemics. American Journal of Botany 81: 1288-1299.
31. O'KANE, S. L., JR., B. A. SCHAAL, and I. A. AL-SHEHBAZ. 1996. The origins of Arabidopsis suecica (Brassicaceae) as indicated by nuclear rDNA sequences. Systematic Botany 21: 559-566.
32. OLMSTEAD, R. G. and J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Botany 43: 467-481.
33. RATHGEBER, J. and I. CAPESIUS. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of the 18S-25S spacer region from mustard DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 17: 7522.
34. RIESEBERG, L. H. and D. E. SOLTIS. 1991. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 5: 65-84.
35. RODMAN, J. E., A. R. KRUCKEBERG, and I. A. AL-SHEBAZ. 1981: Chemotaxonomic diversity and complexity in seed glucosinolates of Caulanthus and Streptanthus (Cruciferae). Systematic Botany 6: 197-222.
36. SANDERSON, M. J. and J. J. DOYLE. 1992. Reconstruction of organismal and gene phylogenies from data on multigene families: Concerted evolution, homoplasy, and confidence. Systematic Biology 41: 4-17.
37. SANG, T., D. J. CRAWFORD, and T. F. STUESSY. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1120-1136.
38. SLATKIN, M. 1989. Detecting small amounts of gene flow from phylogenies of alleles. Genetics 121: 609-612.
39. _ and W. P. MADDISON. 1989. A cladistic measure of gene flow inferred from the phylogeny of alleles. Genetics 123: 603-613.
40. SOLTIS, D. E., and R. K. KUZOFF. 1995. Discordance between nuclear and chloroplast phylogenies in the Heuchera group (Saxifragaceae). Evolution 49: 727-742.
41. _, P. S. SOLTIS, and B. G. MILLIGAN. 1992. Intraspecific chloroplast DNA variation: Systematic and phylogenetic implications. Pp. 117-150 in Molecular Systematics of Plants, eds. P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. New York: Chapman and Hall.
42. _, L. A. JOHNSON, and C. LOONEY. 1996. Discordance between ITS and chloroplast topologies in the Boykinia group (Saxifragaceae). Systematic Botany 21: 169-185.
43. _, M. A. GITZENDANNER, D. D. STRENGE, and P. S. SOLTIS. 1997. Chloroplast DNA interspecific phylogeography of plants from the Pacific Northwest of North America. Plant Systematics and Evolution 206: 353-373.
44. _, P. S. SOLTIS, M. E. MORT, M. W. CHASE, V. SAVOLAINEN, S. B. HOOT, and C. M. MORTON. 1998. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: An empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Systematic Biology 47: 32-42.
45. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 3.1.1. Champaign, Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.
46. _. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
47. SYTSMA, K. J. and B. A. SCHAAL. 1990. Ribosomal DNA variation within and among individuals of Lisianthius (Gentianaceae) populations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 170: 97-106.
48. WALKER, P. J. and C. A. PARIS. 1997. Biogeography, speciation, and concerted evolution in American beach-grass (Ammophila Host): Infraspecific sequence variation in the internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA. American Journal of Botany 84 (6, supplement): 241.
49. WENDEL, J. F., A. SCHNABEL and T. SEELANAN. 1995a. An unusual ribosomal DNA sequence from Gossypium gossypioides reveals ancient, cryptic, intergenomic introgression. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 298-313.
50. _, _, and _. 1995b. Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A. 92: 280-284.
51. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, and J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Application, eds. M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Sninsky, and T. White. San Diego: Academic Press.
52. WOLF, P. G., K. M. PRYER, A. R. SMITH, and M. HASEBE. 1998. Phylogenetic studies of extant pteridophytes. Pp. 541-556 in Molecular Systematics of Plants II, eds. D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. Boston: Kluwor Academic.
53. WRIGHT, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.