Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Global pattern and differentiation by major biomes

Global Change Biology

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1999, Pages 16-24

  Kicklighter, D W ^a   Bondeau, A ^b   Schloss, A L ^c   Kaduk, J ^d,e   Mcguire, A D ^f  

^a ECOSYSTEMS CENTER   (United States)

^b Potsdam Inst F K   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR METEOROLOGY   (Germany)

^e GEOPHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

Author keywords

Boreal forest; Global; Model; NPP; Seasonal; Tropical forest

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; GLOBAL CHANGE; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; TROPICAL FOREST;

EID: 0032792157     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00003.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aselmann I, Lieth H (1983) The implementation of agricultural productivity into existing global models of primary productivity Mitt Geol -Palaont Inst der Univ Hamburg, 55, 107-118
2. Baldocchi D, Valentini R, Running S, Oechel W, Dahlman R (1996) Strategies for measuring and modelling carbon dioxide and water vapour fluxes over terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 2, 159-168
3. 2 ratio of southern hemisphere air. 1991-94 Implications for the carbon cycle Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 9-21
4. Black TA, den Hartog G, Neumann HH et al (1996) Annual cycles of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest. Global Change Biology, 2, 219-229.
5. Bondeau A, Kicklighter DW, Kaduk J et al (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): importance of vegetation structure on seasonal NPP estimates Global Change Biology, 5 (Suppl 1), 35-45
6. Churkina G, Running SW, Schloss A et al (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) the importance of water availability. Global Change Biology, 5 (Suppl 1), 46-55
7. 2 Science, 269, 1098-1102
8. 2 from sites in the NOAA/CMDL air sampling network In Trends '93 a Compendium of Data on Global Change (eds Boden TA et al), pp. 41-119. ORNL/CDIAC-65, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
9. Conway TJ, Tans PP, Waterman LS, Thoning KW, Buanerkitzis DR, Masarie KA, Zhang N (1994a) Evidence for interannual variability of the carbon cycle from the NOAA/CMDL global air sampling network. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99D, 2 831-2 822 855
10. Cramer W, Kicklighter DW, Bondeau A et al (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results Global Change Biology, 5 (Suppl 1), 1-15
11. 3 in the central Amazon forest Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 16851-16864
12. 3 species Planta, 149, 78-90.
13. Fischer A, Louahala S, Maisongrande P, Kergoat L, Dedieu G (1996) Satellite data for monitoring, understanding and modelling of ecosystem functioning In: Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems (eds Walker B, Steffen W), pp. 566-591 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Gao W (1994) Atmosphere-biosphere exchange flux of carbon dioxide in a tallgrass prairie modeled with satellite spectral data Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 1317-1327
15. Goulden ML, Munger JW, Fan SM, Daube BC, Wofsy SC (1996) Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance Methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Global Change Biology, 2, 169-182
16. Goulden ML, Wofsy SC, Harden JW et al (1998) Sensitivity of boreal forest carbon balance to soil thaw. Science, 279, 214-217
17. Grace J, Lloyd J, McIntyre J et al (1995) Carbon dioxide uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain forest in southwest Amazonia 1992-93 Science, 270, 778-780.
18. Grace J, Malhi Y, Lloyd J, McIntyre J, Miranda AC, Meir P, Miranda HS (1996) The use of eddy covariance to infer the net carbon dioxide uptake of Brazilian rain forests Global Change Biology, 2, 209-217.
19. 2 and water vapour exchange rates over a temperate deciduous forest Global Change Biology, 2, 183-197.
20. 2 first results of a model intercomparison study Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12, 1-24
21. 2 to the atmosphere Ecological Monographs, 53, 235-262.
22. 2 at remote monitoring stations with respect to seasonal surface exchange fluxes determined with the adjoint of an atmospheric transport model Physics of the Chemistry and the Earth, 21, 457-462.
23. 2 concentration Nature, 381, 218-221
24. 2 exchange studied through an atmospheric tracer transport model Tellus, 47B, 471-489
25. Loveland TR, Belward AS (1997) The IGBP-DIS global 1 km land-cover data set, DISCOVER-first results. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 3291-3295
26. Matthews E (1983) Global vegetation and land use new high-resolution data bases for climate studies. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 22, 474-487
27. Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B III, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production Nature, 363, 234-240
28. 2 signal. Global Change Biology, 5 (Suppl 1), 65-76.
29. 2 exchange between the atmosphere and the land biosphere a study with a global mechanistic vegetation model Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 7111-7125
30. Nepstad DC, de Carvalho CR, Davidson EA et al (1994) The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of Amazonian forests and pastures Nature, 372, 666-669
31. 2 a comparison of simulations by the biogeochemistry models of the Vegetation/ Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP). Oecologia, 114, 389-404
32. Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM (1992) A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate Journal of Biogeography, 19, 117-134.
33. Rignot E, Way JB (1994) Monitoring freeze-thaw cycles along north-south Alaskan transects using ERS-1 SAR Remote Sensing of the Environment, 49, 131-137.
34. Ruimy A, Kergoat L, Bondeau A et al (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) analysis of differences in light absorption and light-use efficiency Global Change Biology, 5 (Suppl. 1), 56-64
35. 2 flux measurements in models of the global terrestrial carbon budget Global Change Biology, 2, 287-296
36. 2. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 70, 3-15
37. Schimel DS, VEMAP Participants, Braswell BH (1997) Continental scale variability in ecosystem processes models, data, and the role of disturbance Ecological Monographs, 67, 251-271
38. Schloss AL, Kicklighter DW, Kaduk J et al. (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) comparison of NPP to climate and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Global Change Biology, 5 (Suppl 1), 25-34
39. Sellers PJ, Berry JA, Collatz GJ, Field CB, Hall FG (1992) Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration III. A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 42, 187-216
40. Sellers PJ, Tucker CJ, Collatz GJ et al (1994) A global 1-degree-by-1 degree NDVI data set for climate studies 2. The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from the NDVI International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15, 3519-3545
41. Valentini R, De Angelis P, Matteucci G, Monaco R, Dore S, Scarascia Mugnozza GE (1996) Seasonal net carbon dioxide exchange of a beech forest with the atmosphere. Global Change Biology, 2, 199-207
42. Way JB, Rignot EJM, McDonald KC et al (1994) Evaluating the type and state of Alaska taiga forests with imaging radar for use in ecosystem models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32, 353-370
43. 2 in a mid latitude forest. Science, 260, 1314-1317
44. Wofsy SC, Harriss RC, Kaplan WA (1988) Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere over the Amazon basin Journal of Geophysical Research, 93, 1377-1387