Short and long term fluctuations of the leaf mass per area of tomato plants - Implications for growth models

Annals of Botany

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 71-81

  Bertin, N ^a   Gary, C ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Assimilate competition; Leaf growth; Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.; Models; Non structural carbohydrate; SLA; SLW; Source sink ratio; Tomato; Vegetative sink strength

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0031902677     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0647     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Acock B, Charles-Edwards DA, Sawyer S. 1979. Growth response of a chrysanthemum crop to the environment. III. Effects of radiation and temperature on dry matter partitioning and photosynthesis. Annals of Botany 44: 289-300.
2. Ammerlaan AWS, Joosten MHAJ, Grange RI. 1986. The starch content of tomato leaves grown under glass. Scientia Horticulturae 28: 1-9.
3. Bertin N. 1995. Competition for assimilates and fruit position affect fruit set in indeterminate greenhouse tomato. Annals of Botany 75: 55-65.
4. Bertin N, Gary C, Tchamitchian M, Vaissiere BE. 1998. Influence of fruit position and seed content on tomato fruit weight during a crop cycle under low and high competition for assimilates. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 73: (in press).
5. Boehringer-Mannheim 1979. Méthode enzymatique pour l'analyse Agro-Alimentaire. France: Boehringer Mannheim.
6. Bunce JA, Patterson DT, Peet MM, Alberte RS. 1977. Light acclimation during and after leaf expansion in soybean. Plant Physiology 60: 255-258.
7. Cao W, Tibbitts TW. 1997. Starch concentration and impact on specinc leaf weight and element concentrations in potato leaves under varied carbon dioxide and temperature. Journal of Plant Nutrition 20: 871-881.
8. Charles-Edwards DA. 1979. Leaf thickness and specific leaf area. Report of the Glasshouse Crops Research Institute 1979: 118-120.
9. Chatterton NJ, Lee DR, Hungerford WE. 1972. Diurnal change in specific leaf weight of Medicago sativa L. and Zea mays L. Crop Science 12: 576-578.
10. 2 dark fixation. Planta 135: 241-248.
11. 14C-labeled constituents from leaves, bark and wood of cottonwood plants. Physiologia Plantarum 45: 480-488.
12. Dijkstra P. 1989. Cause and effect of differences in specific leaf area. In: Lambers H, Cambridge ML, Konings H, Pons TL, eds. Causes and consequences of variation in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing, 125-140.
13. Gary C, Bertin N. 1992. La surface spécifique foliaire comme indicateur de l'équilibre source-puits chez la tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Bulletin de la société d'écophysiologie 17: 121-127.
14. Gary C, Jones JW, Longuenesse JJ. 1993. Modelling daily changes in specific leaf area of tomato: the contribution of the leaf assimilate pool. Acta Horitculturae 328: 205-210.
15. Gary C, Barczi JF, Bertin N, Tchamitchian M. 1995. Simulation of individual organ growth and development on a tomato plant: a model and a user-friendly interface. Acta Horticulture 399: 199-205.
16. Gary C, Bertin N, Tchamitchian M. 1996. 'TOMGRO' modèle explicatif de fonctionnement des cultures sous serre: un outils pour la recherche et pour l'aide à la décision. In: Baille A, ed. Actes du séminaire de l'AIP intersectorielle Serres. Avignon: INRA, 90-99.
17. Gordon AJ, Ryle GJA, Mitchell DF, Powell CE. 1982. The dynamics of carbon supply from leaves of barley plants grown in long or short days. Journal of Experimental Botany 33: 241-250.
18. Hammond JBW, Burton KS, Shaw AF, Ho LC. 1984. Source-sink relationships and carbon metabolism in tomato leaves 2. Carbohydrate pools and catabolic enzymes. Annals of Botany 53: 307-314.
19. Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM. 1989. Dry matter distribution in tomato and cucumber. Acta Horticulturae 260: 149-157.
20. Heuvelink E. 1996. Tomato growth and yield: quantitative analysts and synthesis. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
21. Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM. 1996. Influence of assimilate supply on leaf formation in sweet pepper and tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science 71: 405-414.
22. 2 enrichment on the rates of photosynthesis and translocation of tomato leaves. Annals of Applied Biology 87: 191-200.
23. Holbrook GP, Hansen J, Wallick K, Zinnen T. 1993. Starch accumulation during hydrophonic growth of spinach and basil plants under carbon dioxide enrichment. Environmental and Experimental Botany 33: 313-321.
24. Hurd RG, Thornley JHM. 1978. Leaf growth. Annual Report of the Glasshouse Crops Institute, 1977.
25. Jones JW, Hesketh JD. 1980. Predicting leaf expansion. In: Hesketh JD Jones JW, eds. Predicting photosynthesis for ecosystem models Vol. II. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press Inc, 85-122.
26. Jones JW, Dayan E, Allen LH, Van Keulen H, Challa H. 1991. A dynamic tomato growth and yield model (TOMGRO). Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 34: 663-672.
27. Leadley PW, Reynolds JF. 1989. Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on development of the first six main stem leaves in soybean. American Journal of Botany 76: 1551-1555.
28. Lichtenthaler HK. 1985. Differences in morphology and chemical composition of leaves grown at different light intensities and qualities. In: Baker NR, Davies WJ, Ong CK, eds. Control of leaf growth London: Cambridge University Press, 201-221.
29. Marcelis LFM. 1991. Effect of sink demand on photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 1387-1392.
30. 2, plant density and pruning. Journal of Horticultural Science 67: 411-420.
31. Nii N. 1997. Changes of starch and sorbitol in leaves before and after removal of fruits from peach trees. Annals of Botany 79: 139-144.
32. Ntsika Boungou G. 1987. Effets d'un blocage de l'exportation sur la compartimentation spatiale et métabolique des assimilats dans la feuille de Vicia faba. PhD Thesis, Poitiers, France.
33. Reddy VR, Acock B, Baker DN, Acock M. 1989. Seasonal leaf area-leaf weight relationships in the cotton canopy. Agronomy Journal 81: 1-4.
34. Shaw AF, Grange RI, Ho LC. 1986. The regulation of source leaf assimilate compartmentation. In: Cronshaw J, Lucas WJ, Giaquinta RT, eds. Plant biology Vol. I, Phloem transport. New York: Alan R. Liss, 391-398.
35. Starck Z, Witek-Czuprynska B. 1991. Modifications of source-sink relationships by prolonged darkness in fruiting tomato plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 13: 271-281.
36. Terry N, Waldron LJ, Taylor SE. 1983. Environmental influences on leaf expansion In: Dale JE, Milthorpe FL, eds. The growth and functioning of leaves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179-206.
37. 2 concentrations. II A mathematical model. Annals of Botany 38: 389-400.
38. Van Keulen H, Penning de Vries FWT, Drees EM. 1982. A summary model for crop growth. In: Penning de Vries FWT, van Laar HH, eds. Simulation of plant growth and crop production. Wageningen: PUDOC, 87-97.
39. Wilkerson GG, Jones JW, Boote KJ, Mishoe JW. 1983. Modelling soybean growth for crop management. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 26: 63-73.