Decisions about access to health cake and accountability for reasonableness

Journal of Urban Health

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 176-191

  Daniels, Norman ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL MEDICINE;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; FORMULARIES; GATEKEEPING; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; INSURANCE, HEALTH; PHYSICIAN INCENTIVE PLANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032782604     PISSN: 10993460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02344674     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard. Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard national survey of Americans' views on consumer protection in managed care. 1998. Available at: http://www.kff.org/kff/library.html
2. Daniels N, Sabin J. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Public Aff. 1997;26(4):303-350.
3. Daniels N, Sabin J. The ethics of accountability and the reform of managed care organizations. Health Aff. 1998;17(5):50-69.
4. Daniels N. Just Health Care. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
5. Daniels N, Light D, Caplan R. Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
6. Daniels N. Seeking Fair Treatment: From the AIDS Epidemic to National Health Care Reform. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995: chap. 4.
7. Daniels N, Sabin J. Closure, fair procedures, and setting limits within managed care organizations. J Am Geriatr Soc. 46(3):351-354.
8. Arrow K. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev. 1963; 53:941-973.
9. Daniels N, Sabin J. Last-chance therapies and managed care: pluralism, fair procedures, and legitimacy. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998;28(2):27-41.
10. Daniels N. Justice, fair procedures, and the goals of medicine. Hastings Cent Rep. 1996; 26(6):10-12.
11. Newhouse JP. Medical care costs: how much welfare loss? J Econ Perspect. 1992;6(3): 3-21.
12. Sabin J, Daniels N. Making insurance coverage for new technologies reasonable and accountable. JAMA. 1998;279(9):703-704.
13. Gold MR, Hurley R, Lake T, Ensor T, Berenson R. A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians. New Engl J Med. 1995;333(25):1678-1683.
14. Hellinger FJ. The impact of financial incentives on physician behavior in managed care plans: a review of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53(3):294-314.
15. Orentlicher D. Paying physicians more to do less: financial incentives to limit care. Univ Richmond Law Rev. 1996;30(1):155-197.
16. Berwick DM. Payment by capitation and the quality of care. New Engl J Med. 1996; 335(16):1227-1231.
17. Pearson SD, Sabin JE, Emanuel EJ. Ethical principles to guide physician compensation systems based on capitation. New Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):689-693.
18. Daniels N. Why saying no to patients in the United States is so hard: cost containment, justice, and provider autonomy. New Engl J Med. 1986;314:1381-1383.