Generalizable patterns in neuroimaging: How many principal components?

NeuroImage

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 534-544

  Hansen, Lars Kai ^a   Larsen, Jan ^a   Nielsen, Finn Årup ^a   Strother, Stephen C ^b   Rostrup, Egill ^c   Savoy, Robert ^d   Lange, Nicholas ^e   Sidtis, John ^b   Svarer, Claus ^f   Paulson, Olaf B ^f  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e MCLEAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032780031     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0425     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akaike H. Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Ann. Inst. Stat. Mat. 21:1969;243-247.
2. Ardekani B., Strother S. C., Anderson J. R., Law I., Paulson O. B., Kanno I., Rottenberg D. A. On detection of activation patterns using principal component analysis. Proceedings of BrainPET'97: Quantitative Functional Brain Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography. 1998;Academic Press, San Diego.
3. Bullmore E. T., Rabe-Hasketh S., Morris R. G., Williams S. C. R., Gregory L., Gray J. A., Brammer M. J. Functional magnetic resonance image analysis of a large-scale neurocognitive network. NeuroImage. 4:1996;16-33.
4. Diamantaras K. I., Kung S. Y. Principal Component Neural Networks: Theory and Applications. 1996;Wiley, New York.
5. Efron, B. 1983, The jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM Monogr. 38, CBMS-NSF, Philadelphia.
6. Efron B., Tibshirani R. J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. 1993;Chapman & Hall, New York.
7. Friston K. J., Frith C. D., Liddle P. F., Frackowiak R. S. J. Functional connectivity: The principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 13:1993;5-14.
8. Friston K. J., Frith C. D., Frackowiak R. S. J., Turner R. Characterizing dynamic brain responses with fMRI: A multivariate approach. NeuroImage. 2:1995;166-172.
9. Geman S., Bienenstock E., Doursat R. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Comput. 4:1992;1-58.
10. Hansen L. K., Salamon P. Neural network ensembles. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12:1990;993-1001.
11. Hansen, L. K. Larsen, J. 1996, Unsupervised learning and generalization, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks 1996, 1, 25, 30, Washington, DC.
12. Hansen L. K., Nielsen F. A. A., Toft P., Strother S. C., Lange N., Morch N., Svarer C., Paulson O. B., Savoy R., Rosen B., Rostrup E., Born P. How many principal components? Third International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Copenhagen, 1997. NeuroImage. 5:1997;474.
13. Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Generalized Additive Models. 1990;Chapman & Hall, London.
14. Hertz J., Krogh A., Palmer R. G. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. 1991;Addison-Wesley, Redwood City.
15. Holmes A. P., Blair R. C., Watson J. D. G., Ford I. Non-parametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 16:1996;7-22.
16. Jackson J. E. A User's Guide to Principal Components. 1991;Wiley, New York.
17. Larsen, J. Hansen, L. K. 1995, Empirical generalization assessment of neural network models, Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing V, F. GirosiJ. MakhoulE. ManolakosE. Wilson, 30, 39, Piscataway, NJ.
18. Larsen, J. Hansen, L. K. 1997, Generalization: The hidden agenda of learning, The Past, Present, and Future of Neural Networks for Signal Processing, J.-N. HwangS. Y. KungM. NiranjanJ. C. Principe, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, November, 43, 45.
19. Lautrup B., Hansen L. K., Law I., Mørch N., Svarer C., Strother S. C. Massive weight sharing: A cure for extremely ill-posed problems. Herman H. J. Supercomputing in Brain Research: From Tomography to Neural Networks. 1995;137-148 World Scientific, Singapore.
20. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User. 1987;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
21. Moeller J. R., Strother S. C. A regional covariance approach to the analysis of functional patterns in positron emission tomographic data. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 11:1991;A121-A135.
22. Mørch N., Hansen L. K., Strother S. C., Svarer C., Rottenberg D. A., Lautrup B., Savoy R., Paulson O. B. Nonlinear versus linear models in functional neuroimaging: Learning curves and generalization crossover. Duncan J. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. 1997;259-270 Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York.
23. Oja E. Neural networks, principal components, and subspaces. Int. J. Neural Syst. 1:1989;61-68.
24. Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictors. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 36:1974;111-147.
25. 15. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 15:1995;738-775.
26. Strother S. C., Lange N., Savoy R. L., Anderson J. R., Sidtis J. J., Hansen L. K., Bandettini P. A., O'Craven K., Rezza M., Rosen B. R., Rottenberg D. A. Multidimensional state spaces for fMRI and PET activation studies. Neuroimage. 2:1996;98.
27. Svarer, C. Hansen, L. K. Larsen, J. 1993, On design and evaluation of tapped-delay neural network architectures, Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, H. R. Berenjiet al., 1, 46, 51, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ.
28. Toussaint G. T. Bibliography on estimation of misclassification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. 20:1974;472-479.
29. Wahba G. Spline models for observational data. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. 1990;SIAM, Philadelphia.
30. Worsley K. J., Poline J.-B., Friston K. J., Evans A. C. Characterizing the response of PET and fMRI data using multivariate linear models (MLM). NeuroImage. 6:1997;305-319.