Kinetic enzymatic resolution of cyclopropane derivatives

Synlett

Volumn , Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1981-1983

  Pietruszka, Jörg ^a   Wilhelm, Thorsten ^a   Witt, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Asymmetric synthesis; Boron; Cyclopropanes; Enantiomeric resolution; Enzymes

Indexed keywords

CYCLOPROPANE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENANTIOMER; ENZYME KINETICS; HYDROLYSIS; REACTION ANALYSIS; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

EID: 0032733359     PISSN: 09365214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-2983     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. (a) Faber, K. Biotransformation in organic chemistry - a textbook; Springer: Heidelberg, 1997;
2. (b) Schmid, R. D.; Verger, R. Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1694; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1608;
3. (b) Schmid, R. D.; Verger, R. Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1694; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1608;
4. (c) Drauz, K.; Waldmann, H. Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1995;
5. (d) Bornscheuer, U.; Kazlauskas, R. Hydrolases in Organic Synthesis - Biotransformations with Lipases, Esterases and Proteases; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1999.
6. (a) Varadarajan, S.; Mohapatra, D. K.; Datta, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1075;
7. (b) Itoh, T.; Emoto, S.; Kondo, M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 5225.
8. (a) Ader, U.; Breitgoff, D.; Klein, P.; Laumun, K. E.; Schneider, M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 1793;
9. (b) Kasel, W.; Hultin, P. G.; Jones, J. B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 1563;
10. (c) Laumen, K.; Schneider, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 2073;
11. (d) Mohr, P.; Waespe-Sarcevic, N.; Tamm, C. Helv. Chim. Acta 1983, 66, 2501;
12. (e) Sabbioni, G.; Shea, M. L.; Jones, J. B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 236;
13. (f) Sabbioni, G.; Jones, J. B. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4565;
14. (g) Schneider, M.; Engel, N.; Hönicke, P.; Heinemann, G.; Görisch, H. Angew. Chem. 1984, 96, 55; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1984, 23, 67;
15. (g) Schneider, M.; Engel, N.; Hönicke, P.; Heinemann, G.; Görisch, H. Angew. Chem. 1984, 96, 55; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1984, 23, 67;
16. (h) Walser, P.; Renold, P.; N'Goka, V.; Hosseinzadeh, F.; Tamm, C. Helv. Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 1941.
17. (a) Csuk, R.; Schabel, M. J.; von Scholz, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 3505;
18. (b) Guibe-Jampel, E.; Rousseau, G.; Blanco, L. Tetrahedron Letters 1989, 30, 67;
19. (c) Barnier, J.-P.; Blanco, L.; Rousseau, G.; Guibé-Jambel, E. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1570.
20. (a) Pietruszka, J.; Widenmeyer, M. Synlett 1997, 977;
21. (b) Luithle, J. E. A.; Pietruszka, J. Liebigs Ann./Recueil 1997, 2297.
22. (a) Fontani, P.; Carboni, B.; Vaultier, M.; Carrié, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4815;
23. (b) Fontani, P.; Carboni, B.; Vaultier, M.; Maas, G. Synthesis 1991, 605;
24. (c) Hildebrand, J. P.; Marsden, S. P. Synlett 1996, 893;
25. (d) Imai, T.; Mineta, H.; Nishida, S. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4986.
26. The enantiomeric purity of the products was determined by glc using a Bondex β stationary phase: Fischer, P.; Aichholz, R.; Bölz, U.; Juzu, M.; Krimmer, S. Angew. Chem. 1990, 102, 439; Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 427. Since in a kinetic resolution the enantiomeric excess of product and starting material varies as the reaction proceeds, it is more meaningful to use the E-value (enantiomeric ratio; measures the ability of the enzyme to distinguish between enantiomers) to compare reactions (see ref. 1, cit, ref.). A simple program to calculate the E-value for given enantiomeric ratios is available free of charge at http://www-orgc.tu-graz.ac.at: Kroutil, W.; Kleewein, A.; Faber, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3251.
27. The enantiomeric purity of the products was determined by glc using a Bondex β stationary phase: Fischer, P.; Aichholz, R.; Bölz, U.; Juzu, M.; Krimmer, S. Angew. Chem. 1990, 102, 439; Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 427. Since in a kinetic resolution the enantiomeric excess of product and starting material varies as the reaction proceeds, it is more meaningful to use the E-value (enantiomeric ratio; measures the ability of the enzyme to distinguish between enantiomers) to compare reactions (see ref. 1, cit, ref.). A simple program to calculate the E-value for given enantiomeric ratios is available free of charge at http://www-orgc.tu-graz.ac.at: Kroutil, W.; Kleewein, A.; Faber, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3251.
28. The enantiomeric purity of the products was determined by glc using a Bondex β stationary phase: Fischer, P.; Aichholz, R.; Bölz, U.; Juzu, M.; Krimmer, S. Angew. Chem. 1990, 102, 439; Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 427. Since in a kinetic resolution the enantiomeric excess of product and starting material varies as the reaction proceeds, it is more meaningful to use the E-value (enantiomeric ratio; measures the ability of the enzyme to distinguish between enantiomers) to compare reactions (see ref. 1, cit, ref.). A simple program to calculate the E-value for given enantiomeric ratios is available free of charge at http://www-orgc.tu-graz.ac.at: Kroutil, W.; Kleewein, A.; Faber, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3251.
29. (a) H. E. Simmons, R. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5323;
30. (b) H. E. Simmons, R. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 4256;
31. (c) H. E. Simmons, T. L. Cairns, S. A. Vladuchick, C. M. Hoiness, Org. React. (N.Y.) 1973, 20, 1.
32. (a) Nishimura, J.; Furukawa, J.; Kawabata, N.; Kitayama, M. Tetrahedron 1971, 1799;
33. (b) Furukawa, J.; Kawabata, N.; Nishimura, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 3353;
34. (c) Furukawa, J.; Kawabata, N.; Nishimura, J. Tetrahedron 1968, 53.
35. (a) Denmark, S. E.; O'Connor, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3390;
36. (b) Denmark, S. E.; O'Connor, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 584;
37. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Christenson, B. L.; Coe, D. M.; O'Connor, S. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2215;
38. (d) Denmark, S. E.; Christenson, B. L.; O'Connor, S. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2219.
39. Takahashi, H.; Yoshioka, M.; Shibasaki, M.; Ohno, M.; Imai, N.; Kobayashi, S. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 12013.
40. Alternative synthesis of (3-phenylcyclopropyl)methanol (93% ee) using equimolar amounts of a chiral modifier: Charette, A. B.; Lebel, H. Org. Synth. 1998, 76, 86.
41. 12O (148.20): calcd. C 81.04, H 8.16; found C 81.03, H 8.21.