Image-guided breast biopsy: Analysis of pain and discomfort related to technique

Breast

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 257-260

  Denton, E Re ^a   Ryan, S ^a   Beaconfield, T ^a   Michell, M J ^a  

^a KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0032729705     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/brst.1999.0067     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mc Mahon A, Lutfy A, Matthew A, McCormick J, Henderson M, Auld C. Needle core biopsy of the breast with a spring-loaded device. Br J Surg. 79:1992;1042-1045.
2. Parker S. Percutaneous large core breast biopsy. Cancer Supplement. 74:1994;256-262.
3. Parker S, Stavros A, Dennis M. Needle biopsy techniques. Radiol Clin North Am. 33:1995;1171-1185.
4. Dolatshahi K, Yaremko M L, Kluskens L F. Non-palpable breast lesions; findings of stereotatic needle-core biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology. Radiology. 181:1991;745-750.
5. Sadler G P, McGee S, Dallimore N S. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and needle-core biopsy in the diagnosis of lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg. 81:1994;1315-1317.
6. Carty N J, Ravichandran D, Carter. Randomised comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and Biopty-Cut needle biopsy after unsatisfactory initial cytology of discrete breast lesions. Br J Surg. 81:1994;1313-1314.
7. Litherland J C, Evans A J, Wilson A R. The impact of core-biopsy on pre-operative diagnosis rate of screen detected breast cancers. Clin Radiol. 51:1996;562-565.
8. Britton P D, Flower C D R, Freeman A H. Changing to core biopsy in an NHS breast screening unit. Clin Radiol. 52:1997;764-768.
9. Michell M J. Image guided breast biopsy-technical advances. Br J Radiol. 71:1998;908-909.
10. McMahon A J, Lufty A M, Matthew A. Needle core biopsy of the breast with a spring-loaded device. Br J Surg. 79:1992;1042-1045.
11. Teh W L, Evans A J, Wilson A R M. Definitive non-surgical breast diagnosis; the role of the radiologist. Clin Radiol. 53:1998;81-84.
12. Nath M, Robinson T, Tobon H, Chough D, Sumkin J. Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge needles. Radiology. 197:1995;739-742.
13. Reynolds H, Jackson V, Musick B. Preoperative needle localisation in the breast: utility of local anaesthesia. Radiology. 187:1993;503-505.
14. Reynolds H, Jackson V, Musick B. A survey of interventional mammography practices. Radiology. 187:1993;71-73.
15. McMorland G, Douglas M, Jeffery W. Effect of pH-adjustment of bupivacaine on onset and duration of epidural analgesia in patients. Can Anaesth Soc J. 33:1986;537-541.
16. Rutter D, Calnan M, Vaile M, Field S, Wade K. Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction, and prevention. BMJ. 305:1992;443-445.