Effects of fish on the local abundance of crayfish in stream pools

Oikos

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 48-56

  Englund, Göran ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRUSTACEAN; ICHTHYOFAUNA; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

ANIMALIA; ASTACOIDEA; CAMBARUS; CAMBARUS BARTONII; CRUSTACEA; ICHTHYOFAUNA; LEPOMIS CYANELLUS;

EID: 0032713036     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3546995     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allan, J. D. 1982. The effects of reduction in trout density on the invertebrate community of a mountain stream. - Ecology 63: 1444-1455.
2. Allan, J. D. 1983. Predator-prey relationships in streams. - In: Barnes, J. R. and Minshall, G. W. (eds), Stream ecology: application and testing of general ecological theory. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 191-229.
3. Bechara, J. A., Moreau, G. and Hare, L. 1993. The impact of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) on an experimental stream bottom community: the role of spatial and size refugia. - J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 451-464.
4. Carroll, M. L. and Highsmith, R. C. 1996. Role of catastrophic disturbance in mediating Nucella-Mytilus interactions in the Alaskan rocky intertidal. - Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 138: 125-133.
5. Castell, L. L. and Sweatman, H. P. A. 1997. Predator-prey interactions among some iontertidal gatropods on the Great barrier reef. - J. Zool. 241: 145-159.
6. Charlebois, P. M. and Lamberti, G. A. 1996. Invading crayfish in a Michigan stream: direct and indirect effects on periphyton and macroinvertebrates. - J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 551-563.
7. Cooper, S. D. 1988. Responses of aquatic insects and tadpoles to trout. - Int. Ver. Teor. Angew. Limnol. Verhandl. 23: 1698-1703.
8. Cooper, S. D., Walde, S. J. and Peckarsky, B. L. 1990. Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. - Ecology 71: 1503-1514.
9. Cooper, S. D., Diehl, S., Kratz, K. and Sarnelle, O. 1998. Implications of scale for patterns and processes in stream ecology. Aus. J. Ecol. 23: 27-40.
10. Creed, R. P. 1994. Direct and indirect effects of crayfish grazing in a stream community. - Ecology 75: 2091-2103.
11. Dahl, J. and Greenberg, L. 1996. Impact of stream benthic prey by benthic vs drift feeding predators: a meta-analysis. - Oikos 77: 177-181.
12. Englund, G. 1993. Effects of density and food availability on habitat selection in a net-spinning caddis larva, Hydropsyche siltalai. - Oikos 68: 473-480.
13. Englund, G. 1997. Importance of spatial scale and prey movements in predator caging experiments. - Ecology 78: 2316-2325.
14. Englund, G. and Olsson, T. I. 1996. Treatment effects in a predator caging experiment: influence of predation rate and prey movements. Oikos 77: 519-528.
15. Englund, G., Sarnelle, O and Cooper, S. D. The importance of data selection criteria: meta-analysis of stream predation experiments., - Ecology (in press)
16. Garvey, J. E., Stein, R. A. and Heather, T. M. 1992. Assessing how fish predation and interspecific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. - Ecology 75: 532-547.
17. Hall, S. J., Raffaelli, D. and Turrell, W. R. 1990. Predator-caging experiments in marine systems: a reexamination of their value. - Am. Nat. 136: 657-672.
18. Hart, D. D 1992. Community organization in streams: the importance of species interactions, physical factors and chance. - Oecologia 91: 220-228.
19. Harvey, B. C. and Stewart, A. J. 1991. Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams. - Oecologia 87: 336-342.
20. Holmqvist, J. G. 1998. Permeability of patch boundaries to benthic invertebrates: influences of boundary contrast, light level, and faunal density and mobility. - Oikos 81: 558-566.
21. Lancaster, J. 1996. Scaling the effects of predation and disturbance in a patchy environment. - Oecologia 107: 321-331.
22. Lancaster, J., Hildrew, A. G. and Townsend, C. R. 1990. Stream flow and predation effects on the spatial dynamics of benthic invertebrates. - Hydrobiologia 203: 177-190.
23. Lonzarich, D. G. and Quinn, T. P. 1995. Experimental evidence for the effect of depth and structure on the distribution, growth, and survival of stream fishes. - Can. J. Zool. 73: 2223-2230.
24. Malmqvist, B. and Sackmann, G. 1996. Changing risk of predation for a filter-feeding insect along a current velocity gradient. - Oecologia 108: 450-458.
25. Mather, M. A. and Stein, R. A. 1993. Direct and indirect effects of fish predation on the replacement of a native crayfish by an invading cogener. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 1279-1288.
26. McNally, R. 1997. Scaling artefacts in confinement experiments: a simulation model. - Ecol. Model. 99: 229-245.
27. Osenberg, C. W., Sarnelle, O. and Cooper, S. D. 1997. Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis. - Am. Nat. 50: 798-812.
28. Osenberg, C. W., Sarnelle, O., Cooper, S. D. and Holt, R. (in press). Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. - Ecology.
29. Peckarsky, B. L. 1991. A field test of resource depression by predatory stonefly larvae. - Oikos 61: 3-10.
30. Perry, W. L., Lodge, D. M. and Lamberti, G. A. 1996. Impact of crayfish predation on exotic zebra mussels and native invertebrates in a lake outlet stream. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 120-125.
31. Persson, L., Andersson, J. Wahlström, E. and Eklöv. P. 1996. Size specific interactions in lake ecosystems: predator gape limitation and prey growth rate and mortality. - Ecology 77: 900-911.
32. Polis, G. A., Holt, R. D. Menge, B. A. and Winemiller, K. O. 1995. Time, space and life history: influences of food webs. - In: Polis, G. A. and Winemiller, K. O. (eds), Foodwebs. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 435-460.
33. Power, M. E. 1987. Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: importance of stream depth and prey size. - In: Kerfoot, W. C. and Sih, A. (eds), Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ. Press of New England Hanover, NH, pp. 333-351.
34. Power, M. E. 1990. Effects of fish in river food webs. - Science 250: 811-814.
35. Rabeni, C. F. 1992. Trophic linkage between stream centrarchids and their crayfish prey. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 1714-1721.
36. Sih, A. 1992. Integrative approaches to the study of predation. - Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29: 183-198.
37. Sih, A. and Wooster, D. A. 1994. Prey behavior, prey dispersal, and predator impacts on stream prey. - Ecology 75: 1207-1217.
38. Sih, A., Crowley, P., McPeek, M., Petranka, J. and Stroheimer, K. 1985. Predation, competition and prey communities: a review of field experiments. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 16: 269-311.
39. Sih, A., Petranka, J. W. and Kats, L. B. 1988. The dynamics of prey refuge use: a model and tests with sunfish and salamander larvae. - Am. Nat. 132: 463-483.
40. Sih, A., Kats, L. B. and Moore, R. D. 1992. Effects of predatory sunfish on the density, drift, and refuge use of stream salamander larvae. - Ecology 73: 1418-1430.
41. Soluk, D. A. 1993. Multiple predator effects: predicting combined functional response of stream fish and invertebrate predators. - Ecology 74: 219-225.
42. Storfer, A. 1997. Gene flow and local adaptation in the streamside salamander (Ambystoma barbouri). - Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
43. SYSTAT. 1996. Systat for Windows. - SPSS inc., Evanston, IL.
44. Wilson, H. W. 1991. Competition and predation in marine soft-sediment communities. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 21: 221-241.
45. Wiseman, S. W., Cooper, S. D. and Dudley, T. L. 1993. The effects of trout on epibenthic odonate naiads in stream pools. - Freshwat. Biol. 30: 133-145.
46. Wooster, D. 1994. Predator impacts on stream benthic prey. -Oecologia 99: 7-15.
47. Wooster, D. 1996. Predator effects on stream prey behavior and local density. - Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
48. Wootton, J. T., Parker, M. S. and Power, M. E. 1996. Effects of disturbance of river food webs. - Science 273: 1558-1561.
49. Zaret, T. M. 1980. Predation in freshwater communities. - Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.