Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 2206-2211

  Kööbi, Tiit ^a   Kaukinen, Seppo ^a   Turjanmaa, Väinö M H ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bioimpedance; Cardiac output; Hemodynamic monitoring; Impedance cardiography; Intensive care unit; Noninvasive diagnostics; Pulmonary artery catheter; Repeatability; Thermodilution; Whole body impedance cardiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; THERMOSTABILITY; WHOLE BODY IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY CARE UNITS; CORONARY DISEASE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 0032709263     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00023     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 1. Sageman WS, Amundson DE: Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients. Crit Care Med 1993; 21:1139-1142
2. 2. Tishchenko MI: (Estimation of the stroke volume by integral rheogram of the human body) [in Russian]. Sechenov Physiol J 1973; 59:1216-1224
3. 3. Kööbi T, Kaukinen S, Turjanmaa VM, et al: Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:779-785
4. 4. Kööbi T, Kaukinen S, Ahola T, et al: Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23:1132-1137
5. 5. Doering L, Lum E, Dracup K, et al: Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1995; 23:1667-1673
6. 6. Thomas AN, Ryan J, Doran BR, et al: Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: The Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery. Intensive Care Med 1991; 17:383-386
7. 7. Bland JM, Altman DC: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310
8. 8. British Standards Institution: Precision of test methods: Guide for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility for a standard test method by inter-laboratory tests. (BS 5497: Part 1) London, British Standards Institution, 1987, pp 3-8
9. 9. Jacquet L, Hanique G, Glorieux D, et al: Analysis of the accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement: Comparison with intermittent thermodilution and Fick cardiac output measurement. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:1125-1129
10. 10. Axler O, Tousignant C, Thompson CR, et al: Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, Fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. J Crit Care 1996; 11:109-116
11. 11. Sherman MS, Kosinski R, Paz HL, et al: Measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients: Disagreement between thermodilution-, calculated-, expired gas-, and oxygen consumption-based methods. Cardiology 1997; 88:19-25
12. 12. Levett JM, Replogle RL: Thermodilution cardiac output: A critical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res 1979; 27:392-404
13. 13. Thrush D, Downs JB, Smith RA: Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: Agreement with Fick and bolus thermodilution methods. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9:399-404
14. 14. Mackenzie JD, Haites NE, Rawles JM: Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: Factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers. Br Heart J 1986; 55:14-24
15. 15. Maulsby RL, Edelberg R: The interrelationship between the galvanic skin response, basal resistance, and temperature. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1960; 53:475-479
16. 16. Conway J: Electrical impedance tomography for thermal monitoring of hyperthermia treatment: An assessment using in vitro and in vivo measurements. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1987; 8(Suppl A):141-146
17. 17. Gudivaka R, Schoeller D, Kushner RF: Effect of skin temperature on multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81:838-845
18. 18. Böttiger BW, Rauch H, Bohrer H, et al: Continuous versus intermittent cardiac output measurement in cardiac surgical patients undergoing hypothermie cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9:405-411
19. 19. Böttiger BW, Sinner B, Motsch J, et al: Continuous versus intermittent thermodilution cardiac output measurement during orthotopic liver transplantation. Anaesthesia 1997; 52:207-214
20. 20. Latson TW, Whitten CW, O'Flaherty D: Ventilation, thermal noise, and errors in cardiac output measurements after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:1233-1243
21. 21. Bazaral MG, Petre J, Novoa R: Errors in thermodilution cardiac output measurements caused by rapid pulmonary artery temperature decreases after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:31-37
22. 22. Merrick SH, Hessel EA II, Dillard DH: Determination of cardiac output by thermodilution during hypothermia. Am J Cardiol 1980; 46:419-422
23. 23. Wetzel RC, Latson TW: Major errors in thermodilution cardiac output measurement during rapid volume infusion. Anesthesiology 1985; 62:684-687
24. 24. Spackman TN, Abenstein JP: Continuous cardiac output may be more accurate than bolus thermodilution output during the use of an upper-body warming blanket. Abstr. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:A473
25. 25. Jansen JR, Versprille A: Improvement of cardiac output estimation by the thermodilution method during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1986; 12:71-79
26. 26. Hillis LD, Firth BG, Winniford MD: Analysis of factors affecting the variability of Fick versus indicator dilution measurements of cardiac output. Am J Cardiol 1985; 56: 764-768
27. 27. Lefrant JY, Bruelle P, Ripart J, et al: Cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: Comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42:972-976
28. 28. Boldt J, Menges T, Wollbrück M, et al: Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient? Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 1913-1918
29. 29. Siegel LC, Hennessy MM, Pearl RC: Delayed time response of the continuous cardiac output pulmonary artery catheter. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:1173-1177
30. 30. Andreen M: Computerized measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution: Methodological aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1974; 18:297-305
31. 31. Stevens JH, Raffin TA, Mihm FG, et al: Thermodilution cardiac output measurement: Effects of the respiratory cycle on its reproducibility. JAMA 1985; 253:2240-2242
32. 32. Nishikawa T, Dohi S: Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth 1993:40:142-153
33. 33. Jansen JR: The thermodilution method for the clinical assessment of cardiac output. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21:691-697