Artificial neural networks in clinical urology

Urology

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 787-790

  Snow, Peter B ^a   Rodvold, David M ^a   Brandt, Jeffrey M ^a  

^a Xaim Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW;

EID: 0032701729     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00327-1     Document Type: Short Survey

References (31)

1. Snow P.B., Smith D.S., Catalona W.J. Artificial neural networks in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer a pilot study . J Urol. 152:1994;1923-1926.
2. FDA: Guidance for FDA reviewers and industry: guidance for the content of premarket submissions for software contained in medical devices. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Device Evaluation, 1998.
3. Rodvold D: A software development process model for artificial neural networks in critical applications. Presented at the 1999 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN'99), Washington, DC, 1999.
4. Stamey T.A., Barnhill S.D., Zhang Z., et al. Effectiveness of ProstAsureTM in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men age 50 and older. J Urol. 155:1996;436A.
5. Barnhill S., Stamey T., Zhang Z., et al. The ability of the ProstAsureTM index to identify prostate cancer patients with low cancer volumes and a high potential for cure. J Urol. 157:1997;63-67.
6. Babaian R, Fritsche H, and Goldman M: A comparison of ProstAsureTM index and free/total PSA ratio in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (abstract). Presented at the Association of Clinical Scientists, Salt Lake City, Utah, May 1997.
7. Tisman G, Strum S, and Scholz M: Pre-therapy prediction of the duration of post-therapy non-detectable PSA for prostate cancer patients considering intermittent combined hormonal blockade by use of computerized neural net modeling. Presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting, May 1997.
8. Snow P.B., Crawford E.D., DeAntoni E.P., et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis from artificial neural networks using the prostate cancer awareness week database. J Urol. 157:1997;365.
9. Wei J.T., Zhang Z., Barnhill S.D., et al. Understanding artificial neural networks and exploring their potential applications for the practicing urologist. Urology. 52:1998;161-172.
10. Brawer MK, Gold M, and Meyer G: Area-weighted microvessel density aids in the diagnosis of carcinoma after negative prostate needle biopsy. Eur Urol 35(suppl 2), No. 79, 1999.
11. Snow PB, Brandt JM, and Brawer MK: Prediction of missed carcinoma on prostate biopsy is enhanced with artificial neural networks (abstract). American Urological Association 94th Annual Meeting (unmoderated poster session 9), Dallas, Texas, 1999.
12. Murphy GP: Prostate cancer: here and now (editorial). CA Cancer J Clin 45: 133, 1995.
13. Tewari A., Mager J., Kamerer A. Genetic adaptive probabilistic neural network model in prediction of pathological stage in localized prostate cancer a pilot study . J Urol. 157:1997;293.
14. Tewari A., Narayan P. Novel staging tool for localized prostate cancer a pilot study using genetic adaptive neural networks . J Urol. 160:1998;430-436.
15. Crawford ED, Snow PB, Lynch J, et al: Artificial intelligence system in prediction of lymph node involvement in radical prostatectomy patients (abstract). Presented at the American Urological Association 94th Annual Meeting (unmoderated poster session 8), Dallas, Texas, 1999.
16. Burke H.B., Goodman P.H., Rosen D.B., et al. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer. 79:1997;857-862.
17. Snow P.B., Smith D.S., Catalona W.J. Artificial neural networks in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer a pilot study . J Urol. 152:1994;1923-1926.
18. Douglas T.H., Connelly R.R., McLeod D.G., et al. Neural network analysis of pre-operative and post-operative variables to predict pathologic stage and recurrence. J Urol. 155:1996;487A.
19. Douglas T.H., Moul J.W. Applications of neural networks in urologic oncology. Semin Urol Oncol. 16:1998;35-39.
20. Ragde H., Elgamal A.A., Snow P.B., et al. Ten-year disease-free survival after transperineal sonography-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy with or without 45Gy external beam irradiation in the treatment of patients with clinically localized, low to high Gleason grade prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 83:1998;989-1001.
21. Prater J.S., Richard W.D. Segmenting ultrasound images of the prostate using neural networks. Ultrason Imaging. 142:1992;159-185.
22. Loch T., Leuschner I., Bruske T. Neural network analysis of subvisual transrectal ultrasound data improved prostate cancer detection . J Urol. 157:1997;364.
23. Maclin P.S., Dempsey J., Brooks J., et al. Using neural networks to diagnose cancer. J Med Syst. 15:1991;11-19.
24. Hurst R.E., Bonner R.B., Ashenayi K., et al. Neural net-based identification of cells expressing the p300 tumor-related antigen using fluorescence image analysis. Cytometry. 27:1997;36-42.
25. Moul J.W., Snow P.B., Fernandez E.B., et al. Neural network analysis of quantitative histological factors to predict pathological stage in clinical stage 1 nonseminomatous testicular cancer. J Urol. 153:1997;1674-1677.
26. Krongrad A., Granville L.J., Burke M.A. Predictors of general quality of life in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia or prostate cancer. J Urol. 157:1997;534-538.
27. Wasserman PD: Neural Computing: Theory and Practice. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989.
28. Lawrence J: Introduction to Neural Networks: Computer Simulations of Biological Intelligence. Grass Valley, California, California Scientific Software, 1991.
29. Bishop CM: Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford, England, Oxford University Press, 1995.
30. Rodvold DM, and LeKang DE: Applying neural networks in the modeling and simulation of environments. Presented at the 1994 TECOM Artificial Intelligence Technology Symposium, Aberdeen, Maryland, 1994.
31. Davis L, and Steenstrup M: Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing: an overview, in Davis L (Ed): Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing. London, Pitman, 1987, pp 6-10.