In vitro Fluoride Uptake by Intra-Orally Aged and Contaminated Glass Ionomer Cement

Caries Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 88-90

  Damen, J J M ^a   Buijs, M J ^a   Van Strijp, A J P ^a   Ten Cate, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Fluoride release; Fluoride uptake; Glass ionomer cement; Plaque

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; FLUORIDE; FLUORIDE SODIUM; FUJI GLASS IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJI GLASS-IONOMER LINING CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER;

ADSORPTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DIFFUSION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PHYSIOLOGY; SALIVA; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH PLAQUE;

ADSORPTION; AGED; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; DENTAL PLAQUE; DIFFUSION; FLUORIDES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SALIVA; SODIUM FLUORIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032613655     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000016500     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ten Cate JM. van Duinen RNB: Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glassionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995; 74:1266-1271.
2. ten Cate JM, Buijs MJ, Damen JJM: The effects of GIC restorations on enamel and dentin demineralization and remineralization. Adv Dent Res 1995:9:384-388.
3. Creanor SL, Carruthers LMC, Saunders WP, Strang R, Foye RH: Fluoride uptake and release characteristics of glass ionomer cements. Caries Res 1994;28:322-328.
4. Damen JJM, Buijs MJ, ten Cate JM: Uptake and release of tluoride by saliva-coated glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1996;30:454-457.
5. Duckworth RM, Morgan SN: Oral fluoride retention after use of fluoride dentifrices. Caries Res 1991;25:123-129.
6. Forsten L: Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:241-245.
7. Forsten L: Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:222-225.
8. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G, Ekstrand J: Glass ionomer materials as a rechargeable fluoride-release system. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997b;7: 65-73.
9. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Suljak JP, Koch G: Remineralization of natural carious lesions with a glass ionomer cement. Swed Dent J 1997a;21:11-17.
10. Jenkins GN, Edgar M: Distribution and forms of F in saliva and plaque. Caries Res 1977;11 (suppl 1):226-242.
11. Mjör IA: The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
12. Nagamine M, Itota T, Torii Y, Irie M, Staninec M, Inoue K: Effect of resin-modified glass ionomer cements on secondary caries. Am J Dent 1997;10:173-178.
13. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT: Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: Three-year results. J Dent Res 1997;76:1387-1396.
14. Seppä L, Korhonen A, Nuutinen A. Inhibitory effect on S. mutans by fluoride-treated conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:182-185.
15. Svanberg M: Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: A 3-year clinical study. Caries Res 1992;26:315-318.
16. Takahashi K, Emilson CG, Birkhed D: Fluoride release in vitro from various glass ionomer cements and resin composites after exposure to NaF solutions. Dent Mater 1993;9:350-354.
17. Tam LE, Chan GPL, Yim D: In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:4-14.
18. Tyas MJ: Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: A five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991;36:236-239.