Predicting protein structure using only sequence information

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1999, Pages 121-125

  Karplus, Kevin ^a,b   Barrett, Christian ^a   Cline, Melissa ^a   Diekhans, Mark ^a   Grate, Leslie ^a   Hughey, Richard ^a  

^a University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hidden Markov model; Protein structure prediction; Remote homolog search; SAM T98

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; MARKOV CHAINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 0032613203     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<121::aid-prot16>3.0.co;2-q     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Benmerah A, Begue B, Dautry-Varsat A, Cerf-Bensussan N. The ear of alpha-adaptin interacts with the COOH-terminal domain of the Eps 15 protein. J Biol Chem 1996;271:12111-12116.
2. Berger J. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1985.
3. Bernardo J, Smith A. Bayesian Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
4. Bernstein F, Koetzle T F, Williams GJ, et al. The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
5. Doolittle R F. Of URFs and ORFs: A Primer on How to Analyze Derived Amino Acid Sequences. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books; 1986.
6. Eddy S. Hidden Markov models. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:361-365.
7. Gerstein M, Levitt M. Comprehensive assessment of automatic structural alignment against a manual standard, the SCOP classification of proteins. Protein Sci 1998;7:445-456.
8. Gilbrat J, Madej T, Bryant S. Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:377-385.
9. Hughey R, Krogh A. Hidden Markov models for sequence analysis: extension and analysis of the basic method. Comput Appl Biosci 1996; 12:95-107. Information on obtaining SAM is available at http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/sam.html.
10. Jones D, Thornton J. Protein fold recognition. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1993;7:439-456.
11. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics, 1998; 14:846-856.
12. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg M, et al. CAFASP-1: Critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins, in press.
13. Krogh A, Brown M, Mian IS, Sjölander K, Haussler D. Hidden Markov models in computational biology: applications to protein modeling. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1501-1531.
14. Lathrop RH, Smith TF. Global optimum protein threading with gapped alignment and empirical pair potentials. J Mol Bio 1996;255:641-665.
15. Lemer C, Rooman M, Wodak S. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: evaluation of current techniques. Proteins 1995;23:337-355.
16. Park J, Karplus K, Barrett C, et al. Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect twice as many remote homologues as pairwise methods. J Mol Biol 1998;284:1201-1210. Paper available at http://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/genomes/jong/assess_paper/ assess_paperNov.html.
17. Santner TJ, Duffy DE. The Statistical Analysis of Discrete Data. New York: Springer Verlag; 1989.
18. Schumacher C, Knudsen B, Ohuchi T, Di Fiore P, Glassman R, Hanafusa H. The SH3 domain of Crk binds specifically to a conserved proline-rich motif in Eps15 and Eps15R. J Biol Chem1995;270:15341-15347.
19. Sippl M. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
20. Sjölander K, Karplus K, Brown MP, et al. Dirichlet mixtures: a method for improving detection of weak but significant protein sequence homology. Comput Appl Biosci 1996;12:327-345.