Magnetic resonance imaging in cardiology

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 12-18

  Bellenger, Nick ^b   Pennell, Dudley ^a  

^a ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA COARCTATION; ARTICLE; HEART DISEASE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AORTIC COARCTATION; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0032604077     PISSN: 00358819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. van Rugge FP, van der Wall EE, Spanjersberg SJ, De Roos A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging during dobutamine stress for detection and localization of coronary artery disease: quantitative wall motion analysis using a modification of the centerline method. Circulation 1994;90:127-38.
2. Kramer CM, Rogers WJ, Theobald TM, Power TP, et al. Remote noninfarcted region dysfunction soon after first anterior myocardial infarction: a magnetic resonance tagging study. Circulation 1996;94:660-6.
3. Pennell DJ, Underwood SR, EII PJ, Swanton RH, et al. Dipyridamole magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with thallium-201 emission tomography. Br Heart J 1990;64:362-9.
4. Pennell DJ, Underwood SR, Manzara CC, Swanton RH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging during dobutamine stress in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:34-40.
5. Baer FM, Voth E, LaRosee K, Schneider CA, et al. Comparison of dobutamine transesophageal echocardiography and dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging for detection of residual myocardial viability. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78:415-19.
6. Dendale PA, Franken PR, Waldman GJ, De Moor DG, et al. Low-dosage dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging as an alternative to echocardiography in the detection of viable myocardium after acute infarction. Am Heart J 1995; 130:134-40.
7. Pennell DJ, Bogren HG, Keegan J, Firmin DN, Underwood SR. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 1996;75: 127-33.
8. Manning WJ, Li W, Edelman RR. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N Engl J Med 1993;328:828-32.
9. Galjee MA, Van Rossum AC, Doesburg T, van Eenige M, Visser CA. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patency and function of coronary artery bypass grafts. Circulation 1996; 93:660-6.
10. Hoogendoorn LI, Pattynama PM, Buis B, van der Geest RJ, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:845-8.
11. 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Circulation 1992;92:15-23.
12. Keijer J, Van Rossum AC, van Eenige M, Karreman AJP, et al. Semiquantification of regional myocardial blood flow in normal human subjects by first pass magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1995;130:893-901.
13. Post JC, Van Rossum AC, Hofman MBM, de Cock CC, et al. Clinical utility of two-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in detecting coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 1997;18:426-33.
14. Duerinckx A, Urman M. Two-dimensional coronary MR angiography: analysis of initial clinical results. Radiology 1994; 193:731-8.
15. Sakuma H, Blake LM, Amidon TM, et al. Non-invasive measurement of coronary flow reserve in humans using breath hold velocity encoded cine MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:745-50.