The Impact of Attitudes on Memory: An Affair to Remember

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 64-89

  Eagly, Alice H ^a   Chen, Serena ^b   Chaiken, Shelly ^b   Shaw Barnes, Kelly ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MOTIVATION; RECALL;

ATTITUDE; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; MOTIVATION;

EID: 0032602727     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.64     Document Type: Article

References (162)

1. Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
2. Alper, T. G., & Korchin, S. J. (1952). Memory for socially relevant material. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 25-27.
3. * Ambler, R. S. (1973). The relationship of ego-involvement to message perception and retention (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1972). Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 6482A.
4. Applegate, E. (1996), Print and broadcast journalism: A critical examination. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-409). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8. Behavioral Science Subpanel of President's Science Advisory Committee. (1962). Strengthening the behavioral sciences. Behavioral Science, 7, 275-288.
9. Berent, M. K., Krosnick, J. A., & Boninger, D. S. (1993). Attitude importance and memory for attitude-relevant information. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University.
10. * Berger, W. G. (1970). Some correlates of attitude change, retention of the attitude message, and evaluation of the communicator (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1969). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 1515B.
11. Biek, M., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 547-556.
12. Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.
13. Boninger, D., Krosnick, J. A., Berent, M., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1995). The causes and consequences of attitude importance. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 159-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. * Bothwell, R. K., & Brigham, J. C. (1983). Selective evaluation and recall during the 1980 Reagan-Carter debate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 427-442.
15. Brigham, J. C., & Cook, S. W. (1969). The influence of attitude on the recall of controversial material: A failure to confirm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 240-243.
16. * Briody, D. M. (1971). The effects of ego-involvement and initial attitude on the physiological responsivity to and content retention of a repeated message (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, 1971). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 3461A.
17. Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33-44.
18. * Buss, A. H., & Brock, T. C. (1963). Repression and guilt in relation to aggression. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 345-350.
19. * Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97-109.
20. * Callahan, M. J., & Olson, J. M. (1981, June). The effects of attitudes on long term memory in an intentional learning paradigm. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
21. Chaiken, S., Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chen, S. (1996). Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 553-578). New York: Guilford Press.
22. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Chaiken, S., Pomerantz, E. M., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (1995). Structural consistency and attitude strength. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 387-412). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Chaiken, S., Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (1996). Principles of persuasion. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 702-742). New York: Guilford Press.
25. Clark, K. B. (1940). Some factors influencing the remembering of prose material. Archives of Psychology (Columbia University), No. 253 73, pp. 5-73.
26. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
27. Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. DeFleur, M. L., & Dennis, E. E. (1991). Understanding mass communication (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29. Donohew, L. (1966). Decoder behavior on incongruent political material: A pilot study. Journal of Communication, 16, 133-142.
30. Doob, L. W. (1953). Effects of initial serial position and attitude upon recall under conditions of low motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 199-205.
31. * Drake, R. A. (1991). Processing persuasive arguments: Recall and recognition as a function of agreement and manipulated activation asymmetry. Brain and Cognition, 15, 83-94.
32. Duckworth, K., & Chaiken, S. (1998). [The effects of availability and accessibility of affective and cognitive components of attitude on memory for attitude-relevant information]. Unpublished raw data, New York University.
33. * Dupree, D. M. (1992). Sources of error in the recall of controversial material. Unpublished master's thesis, Emory University.
34. * Dutta, S., Kanungo, R. N., & Freibergs, V. (1972). Retention of affective material: Effects of intensity of affect on retrieval. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 64-80.
35. Eagly, A. H. (1992). Uneven progress: Social psychology and the study of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 693-710.
36. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but . . . : A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
37. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
38. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1995). Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 413-432). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 269-322). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. * Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Brannon, L., Shaw-Barnes, K., & Hutson-Comeaux, S. ( 1996). Why counterattitudinal messages are as memorable as proattitudinal messages: The importance of active defense against attack. Unpublished manuscript. (Preliminary experiment and Experiment 1 included in meta-analysis)
41. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
42. Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203-216.
43. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1994). Using research syntheses to plan future research. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 485-500). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
44. Eberhart, J. C., & Bauer, R. (1941). An analysis of the influences on recall of a controversial event: The Chicago Tribune and the Republic Steel strike. Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 211-228.
45. * Edwards, A. L. (1941a). Political frames of reference as a factor influencing recognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 34-50.
46. Edwards, A. L. (1941b). Rationalization in recognition as a result of a political frame of reference. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 224-235. (Same study as 1941a)
47. Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 5-24.
48. * Eiser J. R., & Monk, A. F. (1978). Is the recognition of attitude statements affected by one's own opinion? European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 529-533.
49. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Feather, N. T. (1969). Attitude and selective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 310-319.
51. Feather, N. T. (1970). Balancing and positivity effects in social recall. Journal of Personality, 38, 602-628.
52. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
53. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1972). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 23, 487-544.
55. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
56. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
57. * Fitzgerald, D., & Ausubet, D. P. (1963). Cognitive versus affective factors in the learning and retention of controversial material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73-84.
58. * Fortner, B. H., & Henk, W. A. (1991). Effects of issue-related attitude on readers' comprehension and judgments of unbiased text. Reading Research and Instruction, 30, 1-16.
59. Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57-97). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
60. Freud, S. (1938). The psychopathology of everyday life. In A. A. Brill (Ed.), The basic writings of Sigmund Freud (pp. 35-178). New York: Random House, Modern Library Edition.
61. .Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (1983). Behavior as a function of the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 107-112.
62. Furnham, A., & Duignan, S. (1989). The selective recall of attitude consistent information: A study concerning sex differences, Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 32, 112-119.
63. * Furnham, A., & Proctor, E. (1990). Memory for information about nuclear power: A test of the selective recall hypothesis. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 8, 287-297.
64. Furnham, A., & Singh, A. (1986). Memory for information about sex differences. Sex Roles, 15, 479-486.
65. Gackenbach, J. I., & Auerbach, S. M. (1985). Sex-role attitudes and perceptual learning. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 233-243.
66. * Gailon, A. K. (1967). The effect of attitude on learning and recall (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1966). Dissertation Abstracts International, 28, 962.
67. Garber, R. B. (1955). Influence of cognitive and affective factors in learning and retaining attitudinal materials. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 384-389.
68. * George, J. M. (1976). The effects of attitude and commitment on retention (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke University, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 1033B.
69. * Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 165-180.
70. * Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Selective use of heuristic and systematic processing under defense motivation. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.
71. Gormly, A. V. (1974). Recall of attitudinal and value belief statements in interpersonal judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4(2-A), 102-104.
72. Greaves, G. (1972). Conceptual system functioning and selective recall of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 327-332.
73. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
74. Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). New York: Academic Press.
75. Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1-20.
76. * Greenwald, A. G., & Sakumura, J. S. (1967). Attitude and selective learning: Where are the phenomena of yesteryear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 387-397.
77. Hedges, L. V. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist, 42, 443-455.
78. Hedges, L. V. (1994). Fixed effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285-299). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
79. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
80. * Henk, W. A., & Holmes, B. C. (1988). Effects of content-related attitude on the comprehension and retention of expository text. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 9, 203-225.
81. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
82. * Howard, J. W. (1978). Social categorization: Biasing of memory for ingroup and outgroup information (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 443B.
83. * Howard, J. W., & Rothbart, M. (1980). Social categorization and memory for in-group and cut-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301-310.
84. * Howard-Pitney, B., Borgida, E., & Omoto, A. M. (1986). Personal involvement: An examination of processing differences. Social Cognition, 4, 39-57.
85. * Hymes, R. W. (1986). Political attitudes as social categories: A new look at selective memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 233-241.
86. Ikegami, T. (1986). The role of affect in person memory: The influence of positive and negative affect upon recognition memory. Japanese Psychological Research, 28, 154-159.
87. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., Lindsay, D. S., & Debner, J. A. (1992). Lectures for a layperson: Methods for revealing unconscious processes. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness (pp. 81-120). New York: Guilford Press.
88. James, W. (1952). The principles of psychology. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica. (Original work published 1890)
89. * Jamieson, B. D. (1970). Attitude, plausibility, and the learning and recall of controversial material. Journal of Psychology, 76, 169-174.
90. * Janis, I. L., & Rausch, C. N. (1970). Selective interest in communications that could arouse decisional conflict: A field study of participants in the draft-resistance movement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 46-54.
91. Johnson, B. T. (1993). DSTAT 1.10: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. Johnson, B. T. (1994). Effects of outcome-relevant involvement and prior information on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 556-579.
93. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). The effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
94. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (in press). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
95. * Johnson, J. T., & Judd, C. M. (1983). Overlooking the incongruent: Categorization biases in the identification of political statements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 978-996.
96. * Jones, E. E., & Aneshansel, J. (1956). The learning and utilization of contravaluant material. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 27-33.
97. * Jones, E. E., & Kohler, R. (1958). The effects of plausibility on the learning of controversial statements. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 315-320.
98. * Judd, C. M., & Kulik, J. A. (1980). Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 569-578.
99. * Kanungo, R. N., & Dutta, S. (1966). Retention of affective material: Frame of reference or intensity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 27-35.
100. * Kitano, E. (1970). A socio-psychological study on memory trace: The effect of attitude upon memory and its transformation. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 40, 310-318.
101. * Kleck, R. E., & Wheaton, J. (1967). Dogmatism and responses to opinion-consistent and opinion-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 249-252.
102. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
103. Leippe, M. R., & Elkin, R. A. (1987). When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 269-278.
104. * Levine, J. M., & Murphy, G. (1943). The learning and forgetting of controversial material. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 507-517.
105. Lipset, S. M. (1990). Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.
106. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
107. * Love, R. E., & Greenwald, A. G. (1978). Cognitive responses to persuasion as mediators of opinion change. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 231-241.
108. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Involvement and persuasion: Evidence for different types of involvement. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 64-78.
109. * Malpass, R. S. (1969). Effects of attitude on learning and memory: The influence of instruction-induced sets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 441-453.
110. Manis, M., & Dawes, R. M. (1961). Cloze score as a function of attitude. Psychological Reports, 9, 79-84.
111. * Mannello, G. (1954). Attitude as a conditioner of the acquisition of new facts among eighth grade pupils. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 85, 85-103.
112. Matthew, R. L. (1975). The selective retention of favorable, neutral, and unfavorable statements about men and women measured by signal detection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Dakota.
113. McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1991). The content, structure, and operation of thought systems. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 4, pp. 1-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
114. * Olson, J. M. (1980). Selective recall: Attitudes, schemata, and memory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 1163B.
115. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York: Guilford Press.
116. * Paulson, S. F. (1954). The effects of the prestige of the speaker and acknowledgment of opposing arguments on audience retention and shift of opinion. Speech Monographs, 21, 267-271.
117. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
118. Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.). (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
119. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
120. * Pomerantz, E. M., Chaiken, S., & Tordesillas, R. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408-419.
121. * Postman, L., & Murphy, G. (1943). The factor of attitude in associative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 228-238.
122. * Pratkanis, A. R. (1985). Attitudes and memory: The heuristic and schematic functions of attitudes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3657B.
123. Pratkanis, A. R. (1989). The cognitive representation of attitudes. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 71-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
124. Pratkanis, A. R., Syak, P. C., & Gamble, E. C. (1987, May). The role of technical knowledge in attitudinal learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
125. * Read, S. J., & Rosson, M. B. (1982). Rewriting history: The biasing effects of attitudes on memory. Social Cognition, 1, 240-255.
126. Reutzel, D. R., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1991). Investigating topic-related attitude: Effect on reading and remembering text. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 334-344.
127. * Roberts, J. V. (1984). Public opinion and capital punishment: The effects of attitudes upon memory. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 26, 283-291.
128. Roberts, J. V. (1985). The attitude-memory relationship after 40 years: A meta-analysis of the literature. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 221-241.
129. Rojahn, K., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1992). Memory for schema-relevant information: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 81-109.
130. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York: Basic Books.
131. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
132. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (Eds.). (1969). Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.
133. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 708-712.
134. Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341-357.
135. Rotton, J., Foos, P. W., Van Meek, L., & Levitt, M. (1995). Publication practices and the file drawer problem: A survey of published authors. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 1-13.
136. * Russell, D., & Jones, W. H. (1980). When superstition fails: Reactions to disconfirmation of paranormal beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 83-88.
137. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
138. * Schmidt, L. R. (1969). Selektives Behalten bewertender Aussagen über "den" Vater bei Kindern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Einstellungen [Children's selective retention for value judgments about their fathers according to their attitudes toward them]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 16, 138-156.
139. Schudson, M. (1995). The power of news. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
140. Shapiro, M. A. (1994). Signal detection measures of recognition memory. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages (pp. 133-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
141. * Sheppard, B. H. (1981). Opinions and remembering revisited: The case of the disappearing phenomenon. Unpublished manuscript.
142. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
143. * Smith, S. S., & Jamieson, B. D. (1972). Effects of attitude and ego involvement on the learning and retention of controversial material. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 303-310.
144. * Spiro, R. J., & Sherif, C. W. (1975). Consistency and relativity in selective recall with differing ego-involvement. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 351-361.
145. Srull, T. K. (1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 73-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Stangor, C., & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42-61.
147. Stapf, K. H., Stroebe, W., & Jonas, K. (1986). Amerikaner über Deutschland und die Deutschen: Urteile und Vorurteile [American views of Germany and the Germans: Opinions and prejudices]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
148. Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the Attitudes Toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103-118.
149. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
150. * Upmeyer, A., Krolage, J., Etzel, G., Lilli, W., & Klump, H. (1976). Accentuation of information in real competing groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 95-97.
151. Upmeyer, A., & Layer, H. (1974). Accentuation and attitude in social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 469-488.
152. * Wallston, B. S. (1970). Factors influencing selective learning: An integrative approach. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Wisconsin.
153. * Waly, P., & Cook, S. W. (1966). Attitude as a determinant of learning and memory: A failure to confirm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 280-288.
154. * Watson, W. S., & Hartmann, G. W. (1939). The rigidity of a basic attitudinal frame. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34, 314-335.
155. Weiss, W. (1953). A "sleeper" effect in opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 173-180.
156. * Welden, T. A. (1968). The effect of attitudes and retention of message order in controversial material (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1961). Dissertation Abstracts International, 22, 4442.
157. * Weldon, D. E., & Malpass, R. S. (1981). Effects of attitudinal, cognitive, and situational variables on recall of biased communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 39-52.
158. * Wickey, J. (1970). Cognitive factors in the immediate and delayed recall of attitudinal materials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1967). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 2270B.
159. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
160. Wood, W. L., Rhodes, N., & Biek, M. (1995). Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 283-313). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
161. * Zimmerman, J., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Attitude structure, processing goals, and selective memory. Unpublished manuscript.
162. Zuwerink, J. R., & Devine, P. G. (1996). Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It's not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944.