Optimisation of building detection in satellite images by combining multispectral classification and texture filtering

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 50-60

  Zhang, Yun ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Building detection; Co occurrence matrix based filtering; Satellite images multispectral classification

Indexed keywords

BUILDING; DETECTION METHOD; IMAGE ANALYSIS; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

BUILDINGS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MULTISPECTRAL SCANNERS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SATELLITES; SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION; URBAN PLANNING;

MULTISPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION; TEXTURE FILTERING;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 0032590403     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00027-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Albertz, J., 1991. Grundlagen der Interpretation von Luft- und Satellitenbildern: eine Einführung in die Fernerkundung. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
2. Barber D.G., LeDrew E.F. SAR sea ice discrimination using texture statistics: a multivariate approach. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 57(4):1991;385-395.
3. Barnsley M.J., Barr S.L. Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor images using Kernel-based spatial reclassification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 62(8):1996;949-958.
4. Bässmann, H., Besslich, P.W., 1993. Bildverarbeitung: ad oculus: 2. Auflage. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
5. Congalton R. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environ. 37(1):1991;35-46.
6. Dutra L.V., Mascarenhas N.D.A. Some experiments with spatial feature extraction methods in multispectral classification. Int. J. Remote Sensing. 5(2):1984;303-313.
7. ERDAS, 1997. ERDAS Field Guide, 4th edn. Atlanta, USA.
8. Fritz L.W. The era of commercial earth observation satellites. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 62(1):1996;39-45.
9. Fung T., Chan K.C. Spatial composition of spectral classes: a structural approach for image analysis of heterogeneous land-use and land-cover types. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 60(2):1994;173-180.
10. Gong P., Howarth P.J. The use of structural information for improving land-cover classification accuracies at the rural-urban fringe. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 56(1):1990;67-73.
11. Gong P., Marceau D.J., Howarth P.J. A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land-use classification with SPOT HRV data. Remote Sensing Environ. 40:1992;137-151.
12. Gurney C.M. The use of contextual information to improve land cover classification of digital remotely sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sensing. 2(4):1981;379-388.
13. Haberäcker, P., 1985. Digitale Bildverarbeitung, Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Hanser Verlag, München.
14. Haralick, R.M., 1986. Statistical image texture analysis. In: Young, T.Y., Fu, K.-S. (Eds.), Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Image Processing. Academic Press, Orlando.
15. Harris P.M., Ventura S.J. The integration of geographic data with remotely sensed imagery to improve classification in an urban area. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 61(8):1995;993-998.
16. Hsu S.-Y. Texture-tone analysis for automated land-use mapping. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 44(11):1978;1393-1404.
17. Jähne, B., 1989. Digitale Bildverarbeitung. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
18. James, M., 1987. Pattern Recognition. BSP Professional Books, Oxford.
19. Johnsson K. Segment-based land-use classification from SPOT satellite data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 60(1):1994;47-53.
20. Meinel G., Lippold R., Netzband M. The potential use of new high resolution satellite data for urban and regional planning. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sensing. 32(7):1998;250-257.
21. Rosenfield G.H., Fitzpatrick-Lins K. A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 52(2):1986;223-227.
22. Schmitt U., Sulzer W., Schardt M. Analysis of settlement structure by means of high resolution satellite imagery. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sensing. 32(4):1998;557-561.
23. Shanghai's Remote Sensing Office, 1993. Comprehensive urban investigation and study using aerial remote sensing in Shanghai (1988-1991). Shanghai's News and Press Bureau (in Chinese).
24. Stoney, W., 1996. Data summary. In: Executive Summary: Land Satellite Information in the Next Decade The World Under a Microscope. Published by the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 210, Bethesda, MD 20814-2160, USA, asprs@asprs.org), pp. 19-59.
25. Swain, P.H., 1973. Pattern recognition: a basis for remote sensing data analysis. The Laboratory for Application of Remote Sensing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
26. Townsend F.E. The enhancement of computer classifications by logical smoothing. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing. 52(2):1986;213-221.
27. Zhang, Y., 1998. Aufbau eines auf Satellitenfernerkundung basierten Informationssystems zur städtischen Umweltüberwachung: Das Beispiel Shanghai. PhD Dissertation, Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Reihe C, Band 17, Free University of Berlin.