Laboratory study of air sparging of TCE-contaminated saturated soils and ground water

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 182-190

  Adams, Jeffrey A ^a   Ready, Krishna R ^a  

^a 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ETHYLENE; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

AIR SPARGING; DENSE NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS; TRICHLOROETHYLENE;

SOIL POLLUTION;

GROUNDWATER; SATURATED MEDIUM;

AIR SPARGING; GROUNDWATER; REMEDIATION; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

EID: 0032586615     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1999.tb00232.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ahlfeld, O.P., A. Dahmani, and W. Ji. 1994. A conceptual model of field behavior of air sparging and its implications for application. Ground Water Monitoring Review 14, no. 4: 132-139.
2. Ardito, C.P., and J.F. Billings. 1990. Alternative remediation strategies: the Subsurface Volatilization and Ventilation System. In Proceedings of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Restoration, 281-296. Dublin, Ohio: National Ground Water Association.
3. Braida, W. J., and S.K. Ong. 1997. Factors affecting air sparging remediation technologies. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on In-Situ and On-Site Bioremediation, vol. 1,187-192. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
4. Bruell, C.J., M.C. Marley, and H.H. Hopkins. 1997. American Petroleum Institute air sparging database. Journal of Soil Contamination 6, no. 2:169-185.
5. Ji, W., A. Dahmani, O.P. Ahlfeld, J.D. Lin, and E. Hill III. 1993. Laboratory study of air sparging: Air flow visualization. Ground Water Monitoring Review 13, no. 4:115-126.
6. Johnson, P.C., A. Das, R.L. Johnson, A. Lceson, D. McWhorter, and R.E. Hinchee. 1997. Effects of IAS process chances on the removal of immiscible-phase hydrocarbons. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on In-Sitii and On-Site Bioremediation, vol. 1, 135-140.' Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.
7. Johnson, P.C. 1998. Assessment of the contributions of volatilization and biodégradation to in situ air sparging performance. Environmental Science and Technology 32, no. 1: 276-281.
8. Leonard, W.C., and R.A. Brown. 1994. Air sparging: An optimal solution. In Proceedings of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Restoration, 349-363. Dublin, Ohio: National Ground Water Association.
9. Lundegard, P.D., and D. LaBrecque. 1995. Air sparging in a sandy aquifer (Florence, Oregon, U.S.A.): Actual and apparent radius of influence. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 19, no. 1:1-27.
10. Marley, M.C., D.J. Hazebrouck, and M.T. Walsh. 1992. The application of in situ air sparging as an innovative soils and ground water remediation technology. Ground Water Monitoring Review 12, no. 2:137-145.
11. McCray, J.E., and R.W. Falta, 1997. Numerical simulation of air sparging for remediation of NAPL contamination. Ground Wafer35.no. 1:99-100.
12. McKay, D.J., and L.J. Acomb. 1996. Neutron moisture probe measurements of fluid displacement during in-situ air sparging. Ground Water Monitoring Review 16, no. 4: 86-94.
13. Plummer, C.R., J.D. Nelson, and G. S. Zumwalt. 1997. Horizontal and vertical well comparison for in-situ air sparging. Ground Water Monitoring Review 17, no. 1: 91-96.
14. Reddy, K.R., and J.A. Adams. 1998. System effects on benzene removal from saturated soils and ground water using air sparging. Journal of Environmental Engineering 124, no. 3: 288-299.
15. Reddy, K.R., J. Zhou, S. and Kosgi. 1995. New model to simulate air sparging for groundwater remediation. In Proceedings of 5th WERC Development Conference, 299-308. Las Cruces, New Mexico: New Mexico State University.
16. Rutherford, K.W., and P.C. Johnson. 1996. Effects of process control changes on aquifer oxygénation rates during in-situ air sparging in homogenous aquifers. Ground Water Monitoring Review 16, no. 4:132-141.
17. Schima, S., D.J. LaBrecque, and P.D. Lundegard. 1996. Monitoring air sparging using resistivity tomography. Ground Water Monitoring Review 16, no. 2:131-138.
18. Sellers, K.L., and R.P. Schreiber., 1992. Air sparging model for predicting groundwater cleanup rate. In Proceedings of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Restoration, Houston, Texas, 365-376. Dublin, Ohio: National Ground Water Association.
19. Semer, R., J.A. Adams, and K.R. Reddy. 1998. An experimental investigation of air flow patterns in saturated soils during air sparging. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Journal 16, no. 1: 59-75.
20. Semer, R., and K.R. Reddy. 1998. Mechanisms controlling toluene removal from saturated soils during in situ air sparging. Journal of Hazardous Materials 57, no. 1-3:209-230.
21. Wilson, D.J., C. Gomez-Lahoz, and J.M. Rodriguez-Maroto. 1994. Groundwater cleanup by in-situ air sparging, VIII: Effect of air channeling on dissolved volatile organic compounds removal efficiency. Separation Science and Technology 29, no. 18:2387-2418.
22. Zumwalt, O.S., A.P. Krishna, and J.D. Nelson. 1997. Air distribution within a sparging cone of influence. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on In-Situ and OilSite Bioremediation, vol. 1,141-146. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.