Vacuum tunneling of superconducting quasiparticles from atomically sharp scanning tunneling microscope tips

Applied Physics Letters

Volumn 73, Issue 20, 1998, Pages 2992-2994

  Pan, S H ^a   Hudson, E W ^a   Davis, J C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON TUNNELING; ELECTRONIC DENSITY OF STATES; ENERGY GAP; JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES; SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS;

PROXIMITY EFFECT; SCANNING TUNNELING SPECTROSCOPY; SUPERCONDUCTING QUASIPARTICLES; VACUUM TUNNELING;

SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY;

EID: 0032538729     PISSN: 00036951     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.122654     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. A. L. de Lozanne, S. A. Elrod, and C. F. Quate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2433 (1985).
2. J. R. Kirtley, S. I. Raider, R. M. Feenstra, and A. P. Fein, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1607 (1987).
3. H. F. Hess, R. B. Robinson, R. C. Dynes, J. M. Valles, Jr., and J. V. Waszczak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 214 (1989).
4. J. R. Kirtley, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4, 201 (1990).
5. R. Meservey, Phys. Scr. 38, 272 (1988).
6. Q. Chen, K.-W. Ng, A. E. Manzi, and H. L. Luo, Phys. Rev. B 49, 6193 (1994).
7. Y. DeWilde, N. Miyakawa, P. Guptasarma, M. Iavarone, L. Ozyuzer, J. F. Zasadzinski, P. Romano, D. G. Hinks, C. Kendziora, G. W. Crabtree, and K. E. Gray, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 153 (1998).
8. H. Murakami, S. Ohbuchi, and R. Aoki, Physica C 235-240, 1887 (1994).
9. A. Yazdani, B. A. Jones, C. P. Lutz, M. F. Crommie, and D. M. Eigler, Science 275, 1767 (1997).
10. S. H. Pan, E. W. Hudson, and J. C. Davis, Rev. Sci. Instr. (to be published).
11. J. H. Coombs and J. B. Pethica, IBM J. Res. Dev. 30, 455 (1986);
12. N. Garcia, 30, 533 (1986).
13. All differential conductance spectra measurements in this experiment were performed using a lock-in technique with a modulation amplitude of 50 μV. The junction resistance was set to 100 M at a bias voltage of 8 mV (well outside the superconducting energy gap).
14. R. J. Hamers, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 531 (1989).
15. P. Townsend and J. Sutton, Phys. Rev. 128, 591 (1962).
16. S. Guéron, H. Pothier, N. O. Birge, D. Esteve, and M. H. Devoret, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3025 (1996).
17. J. F. Zasadzinski (private communication). One of the signatures of the proximity effect is the appearance of two dips directly outside of the peaks at each side of the gap edge. In SS tunneling this can be seen more clearly because there will be no thermal smearing due to a normal state electrode [as evidenced in Fig. 4(a)]. One can also approximately simulate SS tunneling effects by convoluting a SN tunneling curve with itself. Self-convolutions of both the data in Figs. 1(b) and 2(a) show such dips, whereas the self-convolution of the data in Fig. 4(b) does not. This indicates that the proximity effect is indeed only in the tip.
18. E. L. Wolf, Principles of Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy, International series of monographs on physics, Vol. 71 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1985), p. 105.
19. L. Solymar, Superconductive Tunnelling and Applications (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972), pp. 112 and 113.
20. M. Franz, C. Kallin, P. I. Soininen, A. J. Berlinsky, and A. L. Fetter, Phys. Rev. B 53, 5795 (1996).