Shattuck lecture - Medicine and the media

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 339, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 87-92

  Johnson, Timothy ^a  

^a ABC News   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INTERNET; MASS MEDIUM; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELEVISION;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE; TECHNICAL EXPERTISE; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMERCE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; DISCLOSURE; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; MASS MEDIA; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032499924     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199807093390206     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Americans talk about science and medical news: the National Health Council report. New York: Roper Starch Worldwide, 1997.
2. Bloom SG. Health legacies from Franklin Roosevelt to Robert Dole, or how medical and health care issues took over the nation's news. J Health Commun 1996;1:83-97.
3. Harbaugh RE, Roberts DW, Coombs DW, Saunders RL, Reeder TM. Intracranial cholinergic drug infusion in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neurosurgery 1984;15:514-8.
4. Winsten JA. Science and the media: the boundaries of truth. Health Aff (Millwood) 1985;4(1):5-23.
5. Bloom SG. The legend of the potholes: newsroom changes increase medical and health care news coverage. Pharos 1996;59(3):2-7
6. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer reviews. Lancet 1996;347:1382-6, 1459-63.
7. Wilkes MS. The public dissemination of medical research: problems and solutions. J Health Commun 1997;2:3-15.
8. Goodman SN, Berlin J, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:11-21.
9. Stossel TP. Reviewer status and review quality: experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation. N Engl J Med 1985;312:658-9.
10. Evans AT, McNutt RA, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:422-8.
11. Ingelfinger FJ. Shattuck lecture - the general medical journal: for readers or repositories? N Engl J Med 1977;296:1258-64.
12. Nelkin D. An uneasy relationship: the tensions between medicine and the media. Lancet 1996;347:1600-3.