Small-sample comparison of McCullagh and Nair analyses for nominal-ordinal categorical data

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 217-223

  Best, D J ^a   Rayner, J C W ^b   Stephens, L G ^c  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^c Senso Metrics   (Australia)

Author keywords

Linear logistic model; Nominal ordinal contingency table; Partition of chi squared; Ranking scores

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

LINEAR-LOGISTIC MODELS; MCCULLAGH ANALYSIS; NAIR ANALYSIS; NOMINAL-ORDINAL CONTINGENCY TABLES;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 0032493558     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9473(98)00031-0     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Best, D.J., Rayner, J.C.W., 1998. Nonparametric analysis of ordinal categorical response data with factorial structure. Appl. Statist. to appear.
2. Best, D.J., 1994. Nonparametric comparison of histograms. Biometrics 50, 538-541.
3. Bross, J., 1958. How to use ridit analysis. Biometrics 14, 18-38.
4. Conover, W.J., 1980 Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, New York.
5. Devroye, L., 1986. Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. Springer, New York.
6. McCullagh, P., 1980. Regression models for ordinal data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B42, 109-142.
7. McCullagh, P., Nelder, J. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, London.
8. Nair, V., 1986. Testing in industrial experiments with ordered categorical data. Technometrics 28, 283-311.
9. Rayner, J.C.W., Best D.J., 1998. A smooth analysis of singly ordered two-way contingency labels. J. Appl. Math. Dec. Sci., to appear.
10. Yates, F., 1948. The analysis of contingency tables with groupings based on quantitative characters. Biometrika 35, 175-181.