Nonparametric analysis of ordinal categorical response data with factorial structure

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 439-446

  Best, D J ^a   Rayner, J C W ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b Cmw Sci Indust Res Organisation ^*

Author keywords

Contingency tables; Dispersion (quadratic) effect; Goodness of lit; Location (linear) effect; Orthogonal polynomials; Partition of Pearson's statistic

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041169721     PISSN: 00359254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00120     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Agresti, A. (1990) Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. Best, D. J. (1990) A new technique for statistical analysis of consumer sensory evaluation and market research data. CSIRO Food Res. Q., 50, 85-88.
3. _(1994) Nonparametric comparison of two histograms. Biometrics, 50, 538-541.
4. Chuang-Stein, C. and Francom, S. F. (1988) Some simple log-linear models for the analysis of ordinal response data. J. Appl. Statist., 15, 285-294.
5. Emerson, P. L. (1968) Numerical construction of orthogonal polynomials from a general recurrence formula. Biometrics, 24, 645-701.
6. Francis, B., Green, M. and Payne, C. (eds) (1993) The GLIM System, Release 4. Oxford: Clarendon.
7. Lancaster, H. O. (1969) The Chi-squared Distribution. New York: Wiley.
8. Nair, V. (1986) Testing in industrial experiments with ordered categorical data. Technometrics, 28, 283-311.
9. Patefield, W. M. (1981) Algorithm AS 159: An efficient method of generating random R × C tables with given row and column totals. Appl. Statist., 30, 91-97.
10. Rayner, J. C. W. and Best, D. J. (1989) Smooth Tests of Goodness of Fit. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Yates, F. (1948) The analysis of contingency tables with grouping based on quantitative characters. Biometrika, 35, 176-181.