Scientific activity of Danish departments of clinical physiology and nuclear medicine 1989-1994;Videnskabelig aktivitet på klinisk fysiologisk/nuklearmedicinske afdelinger i Danmark i perioden 1989-1994: En bibliometrisk analyse af »impact« og citeringsfrekvens

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 160, Issue 32, 1998, Pages 4621-4625

  Hansen, Hanne B ^a   Brinch, Kim ^a   Henriksen, Jens H ^a  

^a HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; DENMARK; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PHYSIOLOGY; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; STATISTICS;

BIBLIOMETRICS; DENMARK; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENTS; HUMANS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PHYSIOLOGY; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SERIAL PUBLICATIONS;

EID: 0032479608     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 1972; 178: 471-9
2. Cole S, Cole JR, Simon GA. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science 1981, 214: 881-6.
3. Judson HF. Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review. JAMA 1994; 272: 92-4.
4. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH, Cheung CM, Hayes JA, Chalmers TC. Evaluating the quality of articles published in supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal. JAMA 1994; 272: 108-13.
5. Kassirer JP, Campion EW. Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable. JAMA 1994; 272: 96-7.
6. Lock S. Does editorial peer review work? Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 60-1.
7. Smith R. Promoting research into peer review. An invitation to join in. BMJ 1994; 309: 143-4.
8. Seglen PO. Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1994; 45: 1-11.
9. Garfield E. SCI Journal Citation Reports. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information, 1989.
10. Tanaka N, Sirilli G, eds. The measurement of scientific and technical activities. Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. "Frascati manual". Paris: OECD, 1994. 135-6.
11. The Danish Council for Research Policy. International evaluation of Danish health research. Conclusions and recommendations Copenhagen: The Danish Council for Research Policy, 1993.
12. Braun D. Structure and dynamics of health research and public funding. An international institutional comparison Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
13. May RM. The scientific wealth of nations. Science 1997; 275: 793-6.
14. Garfield E. SCI Journal Citation Reports. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information, 1993.
15. Gøtzsche PC, Krog JW, Moustgaard R. Bibliometrisk analyse af dansk sundhedsvidenskabelig forskning 1988-1992. Ugeskr Læger 1995, 157: 5075-81.
16. Seglen PO. The skewness of science. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1992; 43: 628-38.
17. Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997; 314: 493-502.
18. Roy R, Roy NR, Johnson CG. Approximating total citering counts from first author counts and from total papers. Scientometrics 1983; 5: 117-24.
19. Garfield E Science citation index Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information, 1985-1994.
20. Eldor J. Geography of medical publication. Lancet 1993; 341: 634.