Functional status and well-being in patients with glaucoma as measured by the medical outcomes study short form-36 questionnaire

Ophthalmology

Volumn 105, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 2112-2116

  Wilson, M Roy ^a,b,c   Coleman, Anne L ^a   Yu, Fei ^a   Bing, Eric G ^b   Sasaki, Irene Fong ^a   Berlin, Kerry ^a   Winters, John ^a   Lai, Alex ^a  

^a JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^c CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLAUCOMA; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 0032470729     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91135-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
2. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247-63.
3. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40-66.
4. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, et al. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1992;30(Suppl):253-65.
5. Ware JE Jr. When quality of life is secured. Cardiology 1994;85(Suppl):65-70.
6. Albert TJ, Mesa JJ, Eng K, et al. Health outcome assessment before and after lumbar laminectomy for radiculopathy. Spine 1996;21:960-3.
7. Fontaine KR, Cheskin LJ, Barofsky I. Health-related quality of life in obese persons seeking treatment. J Fam Pract 1996; 43:265-70.
8. Holmes W, Bix B, Shea J. SF-20 score and item distributions in a human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive sample. Med Care 1996;34:562-9.
9. Koran LM, Thienemann ML, Davenport R. Quality of life for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1996;153:783-8.
10. Revicki DA, Wu AW, Murray MI. Change in clinical status, health status, and health utility outcomes in HIV-infected patients. Med Care 1995;33(Suppl A):173-82.
11. Strauss WE, Fortin T, Hartigan P, et al. A comparison of quality of life scores in patients with angina pectoris after angioplasty compared with after medical therapy: outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Circulation 1995;92:1710-9.
12. Williams JW Jr, Holleman DR Jr, Simel DL. Measuring shoulder function with the shoulder pain and disability index. J Rheumatol 1995;22:727-32.
13. Solomon GD, Skobieranda FG, Gragg LA. Quality of life and well-being of headache patients: measurement by the Medical Outcomes Study instrument. Headache 1993;33:351-8.
14. Carithers RL Jr, Sugano D, Bayliss M. Health assessment for chronic HCV infection: results of quality of life. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41(Suppl):75-80.
15. Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 1995;20:1899-909.
16. Albert TJ, Purtill J, Mesa J, et al. Health outcome assessment before and after adult deformity surgery: a prospective study. Spine 1995;20:2002-5.
17. Sherbourne CD, Wells KB, Judd LL. Functioning and well-being of patients with panic disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153:213-8.
18. Jette DU, Downing J. Health status of individuals entering a cardiac rehabilitation program as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form survey (SF-36). Phys Ther 1994;74:521-7.
19. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Lawrence MG, et al. Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:1419-25.
20. Scott IU, Schein OD, West S, et al. Functional status and quality of life measurement among ophthalmic patients. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:329-35.
21. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, 1993.
22. Lee PP, Spritzer K, Hays RD. The impact of blurred vision on functioning and well-being. Ophthalmology 1997;104: 390-6.
23. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. The VF-14: an index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:630-8.
24. Parrish RK II, Gedde JJ, Scott IU, et al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1447-55.
25. Gutierrez P, Wilson MR, Johnson C, et al. Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:777-84.
26. Sherwood MB, Garcia-Siekavizza A, Meltzer MI, et al. Glaucoma's impact on quality of life and its relation to clinical indicators. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 1998;105: 561-6.
27. Wells KB, Burnam MA, Leake B, Robins LN. Agreement between face-to-face and telephone-administered versions of the depression section of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule. J Psychiatr Res 1988;22:207-20.
28. Colombotos J. Personal versus telephone interviews: effect on responses. Public Health Rep 1969;84:773-82.
29. Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health 1979;69:238-45.
30. Yaffe R, Shapiro S, Fuchsberg RR, et al. Medical Economics Survey-Methods Study: cost-effectiveness of alternative survey strategies. Med Care 1978;16:641-59.
31. Aneshensel CS, Frerichs RR, Clark VA, Yokopenic PA. Telephone versus in-person surveys of community health status. Am J Public Health 1982;72:1017-21.
32. Josephson E. Screening for visual impairment. Public Health Rep 1965;80:47-54.