Portal venous magnetic resonance angiography: A review

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 628-636

  Stafford Johnson, David B ^a   Chenevert, Thomas L ^a   Cho, Kyung J ^a   Prince, Martin R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MESENTERY BLOOD FLOW; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0032470454     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199809000-00018     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Williams DM, Cho KJ, Aisen AM, Eckhauser FE. Portal hypertension evaluated by MR imaging. Radiology 1985;157:703-706.
2. Nghiem HV, Winter TC, Schmiedl UP, Freeney PC. MR angiography of the portal venous system. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996;17: 360-373.
3. Edelman RR, Mattle HP, Kleefield J, Silver M. Quantification of blood flow with dynamic MR imaging and presaturation bolus tracking. Radiology 1989;171:551-556.
4. Spritzer CE, Pelc NJ, Lee JN, Evans SJ, Sostman HD, Riederer SJ. Rapid MR imaging of blood flow with a phase-sensitive, limited-flip-angle, gradient recalled pulse sequence: preliminary experience. Radiology 1990;176:255-262.
5. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994; 191:155-164.
6. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF. 3D Contrast MR Angiography. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
7. Krinsky G, Rofsky N, Flyer M, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced-three-dimensional MR angiography of acquired arch vessel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:981-987.
8. Prince MR, Arnoldus C, Frisoli JK. Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:162-166.
9. Prince MR. Body MR angiography with gadolinium contrast agents. MRI Clin North Am 1996;4:11-24.
10. Stieber AC, Zetti G, Todo S, et al. The spectrum of portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1991;213:199-206.
11. Tzakis A, Todo S, Stieber A, Starzl TE. Venous jump grafts for liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis. Transplantation 1989;48:530-531.
12. Redvanly RD, Nelson RC, Stieber AC, Dodd GD III. Imaging in the preoperative evaluation of adult liver-transplant candidates: goals, merits of various procedures, and recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:611-617.
13. Edelman RR, Zhao B, Liu C, et al. MR angiography and dynamic flow evaluation of the portal venous system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:755-760.
14. Ward J, Spencer JA, Gutherie JA, Robinson PJ. Liver transplantation: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the hepatic vasculature. Clin Radiol 1996;51:191-197.
15. Ward J, Martinez D, Chalmers AG, Ridgway J, Robinson PJ, Smith MA. Rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and portal vein. Br J Radiol 1993;66:214-222.
16. Finn JP, Edelman RR, Jenkins RL, et al. Liver transplantation: MR angiography with surgical validation. Radiology 1991;179:265-269.
17. Rodgers PM, Ward J, Baudouin CJ, Ridgway JP, Robinson PJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the portal venous system: Comparison with x-ray angiography. Radiology 1994;191:741-745.
18. Hughes LA, Hartnell GG, Finn JP, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography of the portal venous system: value compared with other imaging procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:375-378.
19. Finn JP, Kane RA, Edelman RR, et al. Imaging of the portal venous system in patients with cirrhosis: MR angiography versus duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:989-994.
20. Murakami T, Igarashi HO, Oi H, et al. Time-of-flight angiography of portal system and collaterals in portal hypertension using a 2-DFT fast spoiled gradient recalled steady-state precession technique. Acta Radiol 1994;35:581-585.
21. Naik KS, Ward J, Irving HC, Robinson PJ. Comparison of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and Doppler ultrasound in the pre-operative assessment of the portal venous system. Br J Radiol 1997;70:43-49.
22. Silverman JM, Podesta L, Villamil F, et al. Portal vein patency in candidates for liver transplantation: MR angiographic analysis. Radiology 1995;197:147-152.
23. Lewis WD, Finn JP, Jenkins RL, Carretta M, Longmaid HE, Edelman RR. Use of magnetic resonance angiography in the pretransplant evaluation of portal vein pathology. Transplantation 1993;56:64-68.
24. Nghiem HV, Freeny PC, Winter TC 3rd, Mack LA, Yuan C. Phase-contrast MR angiography of the portal venous system: preoperative findings in liver transplant recipients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:445-450.
25. Taylor CR, McCauley TR. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the portal venous system. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992;14: 268-273.
26. Silverman PM, Patt RH, Garra BS, et al. MR imaging of the portal venous system: Value of gradient-echo imaging as an adjunct to spin-echo imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:297-302.
27. Johnson C, Ehman RL, Rakela J, Ilstrup DM. MR angiography in portal hypertension: Detection of varices and imaging techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:578-584.
28. Nghiem HV, Winter TC III, Mountford MC, et al. Evaluation of the portal venous system before liver transplantation: Value of phase-contrast MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:871-878.
29. Applegate GR, Thaete FL, Meyers SP, et al. Blood flow in the portal vein: Velocity quantitation with phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1993;187:253-256.
30. Shirkhoda A, Konez O, Shetty AN, Bis KG, Ellwood RA, Kirsch MJ. Mesenteric circulation: Three-dimensional MR angiography with a gadolinium-enhanced multiecho gradient-echo technique. Radiology 1997;202:257-261.
31. Yamashita YY, Mitsuzaki K, Miyazaki T, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography of the portal vein: Value of the magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo sequence. Radiology 1996;201:283-288.
32. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammatter T, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Breath-hold contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;200:569-571.
33. Pavone P, Suma G, Laghi A, et al. Studio conangiografia con risonanza magnetica della vena porta nei pazienti sottoposti a trapianto del fegato. Radiol Med 1996;91:760-763.
34. Squillaci E, Crecco M, Apruzzese A, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in liver transplant patients: Follow-up of vascular anastomoses. Radiol Med 1995;89:65-71.
35. Stafford-Johnson DB, Hamilton BH, Dong Q, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of vascular complications of liver transplantation. Radiology 1998 (in press).
36. Lee JP. Variation in portal and hepatic venous anatomy as shown by magnetic resonance imaging: Implication for transjugular mtrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Clin Radiol 1995;50:108-110.
37. McFarland EG, Kaufman JA, Saini S, et al. Preoperative staging of cancer of the pancreas: Value of MR angiography versus conventional angiography in detecting portal venous invasion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:37-43.
38. Li KCP, Whitney WS, McDonnell CH, et al. Chronic mesenteric ischemia: evaluation with phase-contrast cine MR imaging. Radiology 1994;190:175-179.
39. Li KCP, Wright GA, Pelc LR, et al. Oxygen saturation of blood within the superior mesenteric vein: In vivo verification of MR imaging measurements in a canine model: Work in progress. Radiology 1995;194:321-325.
40. Li KCP. MR angiography of abdominal ischemia. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996;17:352-359.
41. Kane R, Eustace S. Diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome: Comparison between sonography and MR angiography. Radiology 1995;195: 117-121.
42. Soyer P, Rabenandrasana A, Barge J, et al. MRI of Budd-Chiari syndrome. Abdom Imaging 1994;19:325-329.