Preoperative staging of cancer of the pancreas: Value of MR angiography versus conventional angiography in detecting portal venous invasion

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 37-43

  McFarland, Elizabeth G ^a,b   Kaufman, John A ^a   Saini, Sanjay ^a   Halpern, Elkan F ^a   Lu, David S K ^a,c   Waitman, Arthur C ^a   Warshaw, Andrew L ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PANCREAS CANCER; PORTAL VEIN OBSTRUCTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT PLANNING; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

EID: 0030040455     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571901     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Edelman RR, MR angiography: present and future AJR 1993;161:1-11
2. Finn PJ, Clark MP, Goldman A. MR angiography of the liver. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1992;13:367-376
3. Rodgers PM, Ward J, Baudouin CJ, Ridgway JP, Robinson PJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the portal venous system: comparison with x-ray angiography. Radiology 1994,191:741-745
4. Ward J, Martinez D, Chalmers AG, Ridgway J, Robinson PJ, Smith MA. Rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and portal vein Br J Radiol 1993;66:214-222
5. Lewis DW, Finn JP, Jenkins RL, Carretta M, Longmaid HE, Edelman RR. Use of magnetic resonance angiography in the pretransplant evaluation of portal vein pathology. Transplantation 1993;56.64-68
6. Applegate GR, Thaete FL, Meyers SP, et al Blood flow in the portal vein. velocity quantification with phase contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1993;187:253-256
7. Burkhardt DJ, Johnson ED, Morton MJ, Ehman RL. Phase contrast MR angiography in chronic liver disease Radiology 1993;187.407-412
8. Silverman PM, Patt RH, Garra BS, et al. MR imaging of the portal venous system, value of gradient echo imaging as an adjunct to spin echo imaging. AJR 1991,157 297-302
9. Prince MR. Gadolinum-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191: 155-164
10. Anderson CM, Lee RE, Levin DL, Alonso S, Saloner D Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms. Radiology 1994;193:219-226
11. Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Pancreatic carcinoma (review article) N Engl J Med 1992,326.455-463
12. Warshaw AL, Gu Z-Y, Wittenberg J, Waltman AC Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer Arch Surg 1990;125:230-233
13. Fuhrman GM, Charnsangavej C, Abbruzzese JL et al. Thin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately predicts the resectability of malignant pancreatic neoplasms Am J Surg 1994;167:104-113
14. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Traverse LW Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT, Radiology 1988;166:125-133
15. Nghiem HV, Freeny PC. Radiologic staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiol Clin North Am 1994;32.71-79
16. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H. et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability - report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1995;195:327-332
17. Jafri SZ, Aisen AM, Glazer GM, Weiss CA Comparison of CT and angiography in assessing resectability of pancreatic carcinoma. AJR 1984;142.525-529
18. Ross CB, Sharp KW, Kaufman AJ, Andrews T, Williams LF. Efficacy of computerized tomography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Am Surg 1988;54:221-226
19. Murugiah M, Windsor JA, Redhead DN, et al The role of selective visceral angiography in the management of pancreatic and periampullary cancer. World J Surg 1993;17:796-800
20. Dooley WC, Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Yue NC, Venbrux AC. Is preoperative angiography useful in patients with periampullary tumors? Ann Surg 1990;211:649-655
21. Rong GH, Sindelar WF. Aberrant peripancreatic arterial anatomy: considerations in performing pancreatectomy for malignant neoplasms. Am Surg 1987,53:726-729
22. Moossa AR, Levin B The diagnose of "early" pancreatic cancer: the University of Chicago experience. Cancer 1981;47.1688-1697
23. Trede M, Chir B. The surgical treatment of pancreatic carcinoma Surgery 1985;97:28-35
24. Mackie CR, Noble HG, Cooper MJ, Collins P, Block GE, Moossa AR. Prospective evaluation of angiography in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer Arch Surg 1979;189:11-17
25. Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Lee C. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:233-239
26. Frank H, Weissleder R, Brady TJ. Enhancement of MR angiography with iron oxide, preliminary studies in whole-blood phantom and animals. AJR 1994;162:209-213
27. Togawa Y, Fujimoto S, Okui K. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in pancreatic carcinoma based on a retrospective analysis of vascular involvement. Jpn J Surg 1989;19:398-402
28. Zeman RK, Davros WJ, Berman P, et al. Three dimensional models of the abdominal vasculature based on helical CT. usefulness in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. AJR 1994,162:1425-1429
29. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel SA, McDonnell CH, Jeffrey RB. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology 1993;186.147-152
30. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW. Spiral (helical) CT. Radiology 1993, 189:647-656
31. Ibukuro K, Charnsangavej C, Chasen MH, et al. Helical CT angiography with multiplanar reformation: techniques and clinical applications. RadioGraphics 1995;15 671-682