Visual analogue scoring and importance rating for ankle arthroplasty

Foot and Ankle Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 163-166

  Lundberg Jensen, A ^a,b   Kofoed, H ^a   Levi, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Ankle arthroplasty; Visual analogue scoring

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKLE ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING SCALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 0032461174     PISSN: 12687731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9584.1998.00106.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Evanski PM, Waugh TR. Management of arthritis of the ankle. Clin Orthop 1977; 122: 110-115.
2. Mazur JM, Schwartz E, Simon SR. Ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1979; 61A: 964-975
3. Kofoed H. A new total ankle joint prosthesis. In: Kossowsky R and Kossovsky N eds, Material Sciences and Implant Orthopedic Surgery. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1986: 75-84.
4. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Iorio LJ. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle 1988; 8: 279-290.
5. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Meyrson MS. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle 1994; 15: 349-353.
6. Levi N, Lundberg-Jensen A, Kofoed H Comparison of five different ankle scoring systems in ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Surg 1998; 4: 167-170.
7. nd edn New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1988.
8. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P et al. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 639-645.
9. Nies F, Fidler MW. Visual analog scale for assessment of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12. 416-419.