Comparison of five different ankle scoring systems in ankle arthroplasty

Foot and Ankle Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 167-170

  Levi, N ^a,b   Lundberg Jensen, A ^a   Kofoed, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Ankle arthroplasty; Rating Systems; Scoring systems

Indexed keywords

ANKLE FRACTURE; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0032452024     PISSN: 12687731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9584.1998.00092.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Evanski PM and Waugh TR. Management of arthritis of the ankle. Clinical Orthop 1977; 12: 110-115.
2. Mazur JM, Schartz E, Simon SR. Ankle arthrodesis. J. Bone Joint Surg 1979; 61A: 964-975.
3. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Iorio LJ. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of, 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle 1988;8: 279-290.
4. Kofoed HA. new total ankle joint prosthesis. In: Kossowsky R. and Kossovsky N Eds, Material sciences and implants in orthopedic surgery. Dordrecht Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1986: 75-84
5. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS. Clinical rating systems for the ankle, hindfoot, midfoot, Hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle 1994; 1: 349-353.
6. Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA, Insall JN., Knee arthroplasty rating. J Arthroplasty 1992; 7: 145-148.