Recent developments in the law affecting livestock grazing on western riparian areas

Wetlands

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 646-657

  Feller, Joseph M ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Grazing permits; Livestock grazing; Public lands; Riparian areas

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; GRAZING; LIVESTOCK; RIPARIAN ZONE;

UNITED STATES;

RIPARIA;

EID: 0032455968     PISSN: 02775212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03161679     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andrews, J. W. 1998. State trust lands: reconciling the public interest in environmental protection with trust management principles. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, Denver, CO, USA (in press).
2. Arizona State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1997. Arizona standards for rangeland health and guidelines for grazing administration. Phoenix, AZ, USA.
3. Braun, R. H. 1986. Emerging limits on federal land management discretion: livestock, riparian ecosystems, and clean water law. Environmental Law 17:43-79.
4. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1993. Riparian area management: Process for assessing proper functioning condition. Washington, DC, USA. Technical Reference 1737-9.
5. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1998. Healthy rangeland initiative: implementation of standards and guidelines. Washington, DC, USA. Instruction Memorandum No. 98-91.
6. California State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1998. Rangeland health standards and guidelines for California and Northwestern Nevada: Final EIS. Sacramento, CA, USA.
7. Chancy, E., W. Elmore, and W. S. Platts. 1990. Livestock grazing on western riparian areas. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Denver, CO, USA.
8. Coggins, G. C. 1982. Of succotash syndromes and vacuous platitudes: the meaning of "Multiple Use, Sustained Yield" for public land management. University of Colorado Law Review 53:229-280.
9. Colorado State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1996. Standards for public land health and guidelines for livestock grazing management in Colorado. Lakewood, CO, USA.
10. Curtis, C. C. 1973. Managing federal lands: replacing the multiple use system. Yale Law Journal 82:787-805.
11. Donahue, D. L. 1996. The untapped power of Clean Water Act section 401. Ecology Law Quarterly 23:201-301.
12. Feller, J. M. 1991. Grazing management on the public lands: opening the process to public participation. Land and Water Law Review 26:571-596.
13. Feller, J. M. 1994. What is wrong with the BLM's management of livestock grazing on the public lands? Idaho Law Review 30:555-602.
14. Feller, J. M. 1996. The Comb Wash case: the rule of law comes to the public rangelands. Public Land & Resources Law Review 17: 25-54.
15. Feller, J. M. 1998. Legal constraints on public land livestock water developments: NEPA, FLPMA, MUSYA, and the Wilderness Act. p. 461-473. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Environmental, Economic, and Legal Issues Related to Rangeland Water Developments. Center for the Study of Law, Science, and Technology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
16. Fleischner, T. L. 1994. Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western North America. Conservation Biology 8:629-644.
17. Frank, B. L. 1995. Cows in hot water: regulation of livestock grazing through the federal Clean Water Act. Santa Clara Law Review 35: 1269-1308.
18. Hage, W. 1994. Storm Over Rangelands: Private Rights in Federal Lands. Third edition. Free Enterprise Press, Bellevue, WA, USA.
19. Hager, A. V. 1997. State school lands: does the federal trust mandate prevent preservation? Natural Resources and Environment 12-SUM:39-45.
20. Horning, J. 1994. Grazing to extinction: endangered, threatened and candidate species imperiled by livestock grazing on western public lands. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, USA.
21. Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1997. Idaho standards for rangeland health and guidelines for livestock grazing management. Boise, ID, USA.
22. McClaran, M. P. 1990. Livestock in wilderness: a review and forecast. Environmental Law 20:857-889.
23. Montana State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1997. Montana/Dakotas standards for rangeland health and guidelines for livestock grazing management. Billings, MT, USA.
24. Nevada State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1997. Bureau of Land Management Standards and Guidelines for Nevada, Mojave-Southern Great Basin Area. Reno, Nevada, USA.
25. Ohmart, R. D. 1996. Historical and present impacts of livestock grazing on fish and wildlife resources in western riparian habitats. p. 245-279. In P. R. Krausman (ed.) Rangeland Wildlife. Society for Range Management, Denver, CO, USA.
26. Oregon State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1997. Standards for rangeland health and guidelines for livestock grazing management. Portland, OR, USA.
27. Pendery, B. M. 1997. Reforming livestock grazing on the public domain: ecosystem management-based standards and guidelines blaze a new path for range management. Environmental Law 27: 513-608.
28. Reich, C. A. 1962. The public and the nation's forests. California Law Review 50:381-407.
29. Ring, R. 1994. "Unranchers" reach for West's state lands. High Country News, July 25, 1994. Paonia, CO, USA.
30. Safford Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1998. Gila Box Riparian National Conservation Area Management Plan, Environmental Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, and Decision Record. Safford, AZ, USA.
31. Souder, J. A. and S. K. Fairfax. 1996. State Trust Lands: History, Management, and Sustainable Use. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
32. Strand, R. H. 1974. Statutory authority governing management of the National Forest System - time for a change? Natural Resources Lawyer 7:479-502.
33. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1988. Public rangelands: some riparian areas restored but widespread improvement will be slow. Washington, DC, USA. GAO/RCED-88-105.
34. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1988a. Rangeland management: more emphasis needed on declining and overstocked grazing allotments. Washington, DC, USA. GAO/RCED-88-80.
35. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1990. Public lands: limited progress in resource management planning. Washington, DC, USA. GAO/RCED-90-225.
36. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1992. Rangeland management: Interior's monitoring has fallen short of agency requirements. Washington, DC, USA. GAO/RCED-92-51.
37. Utah State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1997. Standards for rangeland health and guidelines for grazing management on BLM lands in Utah. Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
38. Wyoming State Office, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. 1997. Standards for healthy rangelands and guidelines for livestock grazing management. Cheyenne, WY, USA.