Another look at multiplicative models in quantitative genetics

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 543-564

  Dillmaim, Christine ^a   Foulley, Jean Louis ^b  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Covariance among relatives; Inbreeding; Multiplicative gene action

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPISTASIS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INBREEDING; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0032415137     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19980602     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Avery P.J., Hill W.G., Variability in genetic parameters among small populations, Genet. Res. Camb 29 (1978) 193-213.
2. Bulmer M.G., The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985.
3. Chevalet G., Gillois M., Inbreeding depression and heterosis: expected means and variances among inbred lines and their crosses, Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 10 (1978) 73-98.
4. Cheverud J.M., Routman E.J., Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components, Genetics 139 (1995) 1455-1401.
5. Cockerham C.C., An extension to the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present, Genetics 39 (1954) 859-882.
6. Cockerham C.C., Effects of linkage on the covariances between relatives, Genetics 41 (1956) 138-141.
7. Cockerham C.C., Partition of hereditary variance for various genetic models, Genetics 44 (1959) 1141-1148.
8. Cockerham C.C., Higher order probability functions of identity of alleles by descent, Genetics 69 (1971) 235-246.
9. Cockerham C.C., Tachida H., Permanency of response to selection for quantitative characters in finite populations, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 85 (1988) 1563-1565.
10. Comstock R.E., Enfield F.D., Gene number estimation when multiplicative genetic effects are assumed. Growth in flour beetles and mice, Theor. Appl. Genet. 59 (1981) 373-379.
11. Crow J.F., Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative and Evolutionary Genetics, W.H. Freeman and Co, New York, 1986.
12. De Jong G., Van Noordwijk A.J., Acquisition and allocation of resources: genetic (co)variances, selection and life histories, Am. Nat. 139 (1992) 749-770.
13. De Laguerie P., Olivieri I., Atlan A., Gouyon P.H., Analytic and simulation models predicting positive genetic correlations between traits linked by trade offs, Evol. Ecology 5 (1991) 361-369.
14. Eshed Y., Zamir D., Less than additive epistatic interactions of quantitative trait loci in tomato, Genetic 143 (1996) 1807-1817.
15. Fisher R.A., The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 52 (1918) 399-433.
16. Gallais A., Covariances between arbitrary relatives with linkage and epistasis in the case of linkage disequilibrium, Biometrics 80 (1974) 429-446.
17. Gallais A., Théorie de la sélection en amélioration des plantes, Masson, Paris, 1989.
18. Gillois M., La relation d'identité en génétique, thèse faculté des sciences, Paris, 1964.
19. Gimelfarb A., Genotypic variation for a quantitative character maintained under stabilizing selection without mutations: epistasis, Genetics 123 (1989) 217-227.
20. Goodnight C.J., Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance, Evolution 42 (1988) 441-454.
21. Grafius J.E., A geometry for plant breeding, Crop Sci. 4 (1964) 241-246.
22. Harris D.L., Genotypic covariances between inbred relatives, Genetics 50 (1964) 1320-1348.
23. Hill W.G., Variation in response to selection, in: Pollak E., Kempthorne O., Bailey T.B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1977, pp. 343-345.
24. Horner T.W., Comstock R.E., Robinson H.F., Non allelic interactions and the interpretation of quantitative genetic data, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Tech. Bull. 118 (1955) 177.