Treatment outcome after radical prostatectomy is not adversely affected by a pre-existing penile prosthesis

Urology

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1030-1033

  Tiguert, Rabi ^a   Hurley, Patrick M ^a   Gheiler, Edward L ^a   Tefilli, Marcos V ^a   Gudziak, Marko R ^a   Dhabuwala, C B ^a   Pontes, J Edson ^a   Wood Jr , David P ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PENIS PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SAFETY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PENILE PROSTHESIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032403409     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00372-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kowalczyk J.J., Mulcahy J.J. Penile curvatures and aneurysmal defects with the Ultrex penile prosthesis corrected with insertion of the AMS 700 CX. J Urol. 156:1996;398-401.
2. Fried F.A., Carson C.C. Impotence improving patient treatment. J Urol. 155:1996;1624-1625.
3. Wilson S.K., Cleves M., Delk J.R. Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatable . J Urol. 155:1996;1621-1623.
4. Pontes J.E. Methods of early detection of prostate cancer the role of prostatic specific antigen, transrectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination . In Vivo. 8:1994;413-414.
5. Dubocq F., Tefilli M.V., Gheiler E.L., et al. Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology. 52:1998;277-281.
6. Grignon D.J., Sakr W.A. Pathological staging of prostate carcinoma. What are the issues? Cancer. 78:1996;337-340.
7. Pontes J.E. Surgery of Genitourinary Pelvic Tumors. 1993;73-79 Wiley-Liss, New York.
8. Dunsmuir W.D., Kirby R.S. Conservation of inflatable penile prosthesis during radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 79:1997;283-284.
9. Davis B.E., DeBrock B.J., Lierz M.F., et al. Management of preexisting inflatable penile prosthesis during radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 148:1992;1198-1200.
10. Goad J.R., Eastham J.A., Fitzgerald K.B., et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy limited benefit of autologous blood donation . J Urol. 154:1995;2103-2109.
11. Goh M., Kleer C.G., Kielczewski P., et al. Autologous blood donation prior to anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy is it necessary? Urology. 49:1997;569-573.
12. Ohori M., Wheeler T.M., Kattan M.W., et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 154:1995;1818-1824.
13. Fesseha T., Sakr W., Grignon D., et al. Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 158:1997;2176-2179.
14. Jarow J.P. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol. 156:1996;402-404.
15. Khoudary K.P., De Wolf W.C., Bruning C.O. III, et al. Immediate sexual rehabilitation by simultaneous placement of penile prosthesis in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy initial results in 50 patients . Urology. 50:1997;395-399.
16. Dubocq F.M., Bianco F.J. Jr, Maralani S.J., et al. Outcome analysis of penile implant surgery after external beam radiation for prostate cancer. J Urol. 158:1997;1787-1790.