Hate speech and its harms: A communication theory perspective

Journal of Communication

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 4-19

  Calvert, Clay ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031535480     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02690.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Altman, A. (1995). Liberalism and campus hate speech. In J. Arthur & A. Shapiro (Eds.), Campus wars: Multiculturalism and the politics of difference (pp. 122-134). Boulder, CO: Westview.
2. Bailey, W. (1981). The Supreme Court and communication theory: Contrasting models of speech efficacy. In P. E. Kane (Ed.), Free Speech Yearbook 1980 (pp. 1-15). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
3. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of knowledge: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Irvington Publishers.
4. Bezanson, R. P., & Ingle, K. L. (1986). Plato's cave revisited: The epistemology of perception in contemporary defamation law. Dickinson Law Review, 90, 585-607.
5. Bollinger, L. C. (1986). The tolerant society: Freedom of speech and extremist speech in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
7. Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
8. Calvert, C. (1995a). Awareness of meaning in libel law: An interdisciplinary communication and law critique. Northern Illinois University Law Review, 16, 111-140.
9. Calvert, C. (1995b). Harm to reputation: An interdisciplinary approach to the impact of denial of defamatory allegations. Pacific Law Journal, 26, 933-960.
10. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York: Routledge.
11. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
12. Christians, C. G., Ferre, J. P., & Fackler, P. M. (1993). Good news: Social ethics and the press. New York: Oxford University.
13. Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §2000e et seq. (West 1993).
14. Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971).
15. Cohen, J., & Gleason, T. (1990). Social research in communication and law. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Cohen, J., & Gunther, A. C. (1987). Libel as communication phenomena. Communications and the Law, 9, 9-30.
17. Corry v. Leland Stanford Junior University, No. CV740309 (Superior Court of California, Santa Clara Co., Feb. 27, 1995).
18. Cowan, G., & Hodge, C. (1996). Judgments of hate speech: The effects of target group, publicness, and behavioral responses of the target. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 355-374.
19. Delgado, R. (Ed.). (1995). Critical race theory: The cutting edge. Philadelphia: Temple University.
20. Delgado, R. (1995). Words that wound: A tort action for racial insults, epithets, and name-calling. In R. Delgado (Ed.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 159-168). Philadelphia: Temple University.
21. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (1995). Images of the outsider in American law and culture: Can free expression remedy systemic social ills? In R. Delgado (Ed.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 217-227). Philadelphia: Temple University.
22. Doe v. University of Michigan, 721 F.Supp. 852 (E.D. Mich. 1989).
23. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California.
24. Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U.S. 518 (1972).
25. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Q. Hoare & G. Smith, Trans.). New York: International Publishers. (Original work published 1927).
26. Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1985). The effect of overheard ethnic slur on evaluations of the target: How to spread a social disease. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 61-72.
27. Grimes, T., & Dreschel, R. (1996). Word-picture juxtaposition, schemata, and defamation in television news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 169-180.
28. Gunther, G. (1995). Good speech, bad speech - no. In J. Arthur & A. Shapiro (Eds.), Campus wars: Multiculturalism and the politics of difference (pp. 109-113). Boulder, CO: Westview.
29. Haiman, F. S. (1981). Speech and law in a free society. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
30. Haiman, F. S. (1993). Speech acts and the first amendment. Carbondal: Southern Illinois University Press.
31. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 114 S.Ct. 367 (1993).
32. Haskins, W. A., Patzke, J. C., & Price, M. J. (1986). Freedom of speech: A review based on analytical communication models. Communications and the Law, 8, 37-54.
33. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell. 485 U.S. 46 (1988).
34. Kubey, R., Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M (1996). Experienie sampling method applications to communication research questions. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 99-120.
35. Lee v. Weisman, 112 S.Ct. 2649 (1992).
36. Lopez, I. F. H. (1995). The social construction of race. In R. Delgado (Ed.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 191-202). Philadelphia: Temple University.
37. MacKinnon, C. A. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
38. MacKinnon, C. A. (1993) Only words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
39. Matsuda, M. J., Lawrence, C. R., Delgado, R., & Crenshaw, K. W. (1993). Words that wound. Boulder, CO: Westview.
40. McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (1993). Communication models (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
41. R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul, 112 S.Ct. 2538 (1992).
42. Rogers, R. W., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1981). Deindividualism and anger-mediated interracial aggression: Unmasking regressive racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 63-73.
43. Schauer, F. (1995). The first amendment as ideology. In D. S. Allen & R. Jensen (Eds.), Freeing the first amendment: Critical perspectives on freedom of expression (pp. 10-28). New York: New York University.
44. Severin, W. J., & Tankard, J. W., Jr. (1988). Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
45. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension. New York: Harper & Row.
46. Smolla, R. (1992). Free speech in an open society. New York: Knopf.
47. Streeter, T. (1995). Some thoughts on free speech, language, and the rule of law. In D. S. Allen & R. Jensen (Eds.), Freeing the first amendment: Critical perspectives on freedom of expression (pp. 31-53). New York: New York University.
48. UWM Post v. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin, 774 F. Supp. 1163 (E.D. Wis. 1991).
49. Van Biema, D. (1996, July 1). After the burning. Time, 52-53.
50. Walker, S. (1994). Hate speech: The history of an American controversy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
51. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. New York: Oxford University.
52. Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 113 S.Ct. 2194 (1993).