Sampling variance in the correlation coefficient under indirect range restriction: Implications for validity generalization

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 528-538

  Aguinis, Herman ^a   Whitehead, Roger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040453585     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.528     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aguinis, H. (1994). A QuickBASIC program for generating correlated multivariate random normal scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 687-689.
2. Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21, 1141-1158.
3. Aguinis, H., Bommer, W. H., & Pierce, C. A. (1996). Improving the estimation of moderating effects by using computer-administered questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 1043-1047.
4. Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (in press). Testing moderator variable hypotheses meta-analytically. Journal of Management.
5. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Estimating the power to detect dichotomous moderators with moderated multiple regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 690-692.
6. Aguinis, H., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 192-206.
7. Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G. (1988). Unbiased estimation of sampling variance of correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 312-315.
8. Fisher, R. A. (1921). On the "probable error" of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron, 1, 1-32.
9. Fisher, R. A. (1954). Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
10. Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Freeman.
11. Hartley, H. O., & Harris, D. L. (1963). Monte Carlo computations in normal correlation problems. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 10, 302-306.
12. Hattrup, K., & Schmitt, N. (1990). Prediction of trades apprentices' performance on job sample criteria. Personnel Psychology, 43, 453-466.
13. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1994). Estimation of sampling error variance in the meta-analysis of correlations: Use of average correlation in the homogeneous case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 171-177.
15. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries. (1989). IMSL library reference manual (10th ed.). Houston, TX: Author.
17. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Mulaik, S. A. (1986). A note on validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 440-450.
18. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., Mulaik, S. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1988). Validity generalization: Rejoinder to Schmidt, Hunter, and Raju (1988). Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 673-678.
19. Johnson, B. T., Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (1995). Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 94-106.
20. Law, K. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1994a). Nonlinearity of range corrections in meta-analysis: Test of an improved procedure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 425-438.
21. Law, K. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1994b). A test of two refinements in procedures for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 978-986.
22. Lawley, D. N. (1943). A note on Karl Pearson's selection formulae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 62(Section A, Pt. 1), 28-30.
23. Lent, R. H., Aurbach, H. A., & Levin, L. S. (1971). Research design and validity assessment. Personnel Psychology, 24, 247-274.
24. Linn, R. L. (1983a). Pearson selection formulas: Implications for studies of predictive bias and estimates of educational effects in selected samples. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 1-15.
25. Linn, R. L. (1983b). Predictive bias as an artifact of selection procedures. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.), Principals of modern psychological measurement: A festschrift for Frederic M. Lord (pp. 27-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. McNemar, Q. (1962). Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
27. Mendoza, J. G., & Reinhardt, R. N. (1991). Validity generalization procedures using sample-based estimates: A comparison of six procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 596-610.
28. Millsap, R. E. (1989). Sampling variance in the correlation coefficient under range restriction: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 456-461.
29. Noreen, E. W. (1989). Computer intensive methods for testing hypotheses. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
30. Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 373-406.
31. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Reinhart Winston.
32. Ree, M. J., Carretta, T. R., Earles, J. A., & Albert, W. (1994). Sign changes when correcting for range restriction: A note on Pearson's and Lawley's selection formulas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 298-301.
33. Rubinstein, R. Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. New York: Wiley.
34. Russell, C. J., Settoon, R. P., McGrath, R. N., Blanton, A. E., Kidwell, R. E., Lohrke, F. T., Scifres, E. L., & Danforth, G. W. (1994). Investigator characteristics as moderators of personnel selection research: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 163-170.
35. Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
36. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1978). Moderator research and the law of small numbers. Personnel Psychology, 31, 215-232.
37. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Pearlman, K., & Shane, G. S. (1979). Further tests of the Schmidt-Hunter Bayesian validity generalization procedure. Personnel Psychology, 32, 257-381.
38. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Urry, V. W. (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 473-485.
39. Schmidt, F. L., Law, K., Hunter, J. E., Rothstein, H. R., Pearlman, K., & McDaniel, M. (1993). Refinements in validity generalization methods: Implications for the situational specificity hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 3-12.
40. Stone-Romero, E. F., Alliger, G. M., & Aguinis, H. (1994). Type II error problems in the use of moderated multiple regression for the detection of moderating effects of dichotomous variables. Journal of Management, 20, 167-178.
41. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection. New York: Wiley.