Cognitive Neuroscience and Educational Psychology: What Season Is It?

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 419-426

  Stanovich, Keith E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Education; Neuroscience; Scientific reduction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032350566     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022893418735     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educ. Res. 26(8): 4-16.
2. Castles, A., and Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition 47: 149-180.
3. Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Churchland, P. M. (1995). The engine of reason, the seat of the soul, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. MIT Press, Cambridge.
7. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L., Liberman, I., Stuebing, K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A., and Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. J. Educ. Psychol. 86: 6-23.
8. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Galaburda, A. (1994). Developmental dyslexia and animal studies: At the interface between cognition and neurology. Cognition 50: 133-149.
10. Humphreys, G. W., and Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behav. Brain Sci. 8: 689-740.
11. Hynd, G. W., Clinton, A., and Hiemenz, J. R. (in press). Neuropsychological basis of learning disabilities. In Sternberg, R. J., and Spear-Swerling, L. (eds.), Perspectives on learning disabilities, Westview/HarperCollins, New York.
12. Liberman, I. Y., and Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial Spec. Educ. 6: 8-17.
13. Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., and Peterson, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition 58: 157-195.
14. McCauley, R. N. (ed.). (1996). The Churchlands and their critics, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
15. Morrison, F. J. (1991). Learning (and not learning) to read: A developmental framework. In Rieben, L., and Perfetti, C. (eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 163-174.
16. Nelson, C. A., and Bloom, F. E. (1997). Child development and neuroscience. Child Devel. 68: 970-987.
17. Olson, R. K. (1998). Genes, environment, and reading disabilities. In Sternberg, R. J., and Spear-Swerling, L. (eds.), Perspectives on learning disabilities, Westview/HarperCollins, New York.
18. Pennington, B. F. (1986). Issues in the diagnosis and phenotype analysis of dyslexia: Implications for family studies. In Smith, S. D. (ed.), Genetics and learning disabilities, College-Hill Press, San Diego, pp. 69-96.
19. Pennington, B. F. (1994). Genetics of learning disabilities. J. Child Neurol. 10 (Suppl.) S69-S76.
20. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., and Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychol. Rev. 103: 56-115.
21. Putnam, H. (1995). Why functionalism didn't work. In Putnam, H. (ed.), Words & life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 441-45.
22. Rutter, M. (1978). Prevalence and types of dyslexia. In Benton, A., and Pearl, D. (eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 5-28.
23. Seidenberg, M. S., and McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev. 96: 523-568.
24. Siegel, L. S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Can. J. Psychol. 42: 201-215.
25. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. J. Learn. Disab. 22: 469-479.
26. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In Torgesen, J., and Wong, B. (eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities, Academic Press, New York, pp. 87-131.
27. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. J. Learn. Disab. 21: 590-612.
28. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Res. Quart. 26: 7-29.
29. Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Romance and reality. Reading Teacher 47(4): 280-291.
30. Stanovich, K. E., and Siegel, L. S. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of reading-disabled children: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. J. Educ. Psychol. 86: 24-53.
31. Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L. S., and Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. J. Educ. Psychol. 89: 114-127.
32. Uttal, W. (1971). The psychobiological silly season - or - what happens when neurophysiological data become psychological theories. J. Gen. Psychol. 84: 151-166.
33. Vellutino, F. (1978). Toward an understanding of dyslexia: Psychological factors in specific reading disability. In Benton, A. L., and Pearl, D. (eds.), Dyslexia, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 59-111.