Anonymous review and the boundaries of "intrinsic merit"

Journal of Information Ethics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 54-67

  Smith, Louise Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032346542     PISSN: 10619321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Bazerman, C. (1988). Sharing written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental articles in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Bedeian, A. (1996). Improving the journal review process: the question of ghostwriting. The American Psychologist 51, 1189-1191.
3. Berezin, A., R. Bordon, & G. Hunter (1995, February 11). Lifting the pernicious veil of secrecy. New Scientist, 145.
4. Bledstein, B. (1976). The culture of professionalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5. Bleich, D. (1989). Reconceiving literacy: Language use and social relations. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research. (pp. 109-127). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
6. Fine, M. Reflections on enhancing accountability in the peer review process. The American Psychologist 51, 1190-1192.
7. Fish, S. (1967). Surprised by sin. The reader in Paradise Lost. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9. Fish, S. (1985). Anti-professionalism. New Literary History 17, 89-108.
10. Fish, S. (1988). No bias, no merit: The case against blind submission. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association 103, 739-748.
11. Fish, S. (1989). Reply. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association 104, 219-221.
12. Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
13. Goodstein, D. (1996, August 2). "Every scientist I know has stories of being treated unfairly by anonymous referees." The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B5.
14. Graff, G. (1985). Interpretation on Tlön: A response to Stanley Fish. New Literary History 17, 109-117.
15. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
16. Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy 88, 693-709.
17. Hinz, E. (1997). "It's not the principle, it's the money!" An economic revisioning of publishing ethics. Journal of Information Ethics 6(1), 22-33.
18. Holstun, J. (1989). [Letter to the editor]. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association 104, 216-217.
19. Horowitz, I. (1997). Publishing programs and moral dilemmas. Journal of Information Ethics 6(1), 13-21.
20. Hunter, S. (1995). The case for reviewing as collaboration and response. Rhetoric Review 13, 265-272.
21. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Larson, M. (1977). The rise of professionalism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
23. Protti, M. (1996). Policing fraud and deceit: The legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Journal of Information Ethics 5(1), 59-71.
24. Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25. Schaefer, W. (1978). Anonymous review: A report from the executive director. MLA Newsletter 10(2), 4-6.
26. Schwartz, M. (1983). Revision profiles: Patterns and implications. College English 45, 549-558.
27. Shatz, D. Is peer review overrated? The Monist 79, 536-564.
28. Shulman, K., D. Sulmasy, & D. Roney (1994). Ethics, economics, and the publication policies of major medical journals. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 272(2), 154-157.
29. Skoblow, J. (1989). [Letter to the editor]. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association 104, 216.
30. Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication 31, 378-387.
31. Stanton, D. (1997. What's in a name? revisiting author-anonymous reviewing. PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association 112, 191-197.