Policing fraud and deceit: The legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry

Journal of Information Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 59-71

  Protti, Maria ^a  

^a McFarland and Company Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMISSION ON RESEARCH INTEGRITY; FORGERY; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; PUNISHMENT; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL CONTROL; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; WHISTLEBLOWING;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMISSION ON RESEARCH INTEGRITY; LEGAL APPROACH; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DISCLOSURE; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; FRAUD; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; INTENTION; JURISPRUDENCE; LIABILITY, LEGAL; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PEER REVIEW; PUNISHMENT; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; SOCIETIES; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY; UNIVERSITIES; WHISTLEBLOWING;

EID: 0030099684     PISSN: 10619321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Altman, L.K. (1994, November 7-12). PR Companies Accused of Subventing Research Papers. The East African, 23.
2. The Arizona Republic (1995, July 8), A6.
3. Association of American Medical Colleges. (1982) The Maintenance of High Ethical Standards in the Conduct of Research.
4. The Boston Globe. (1995, April 11), 3.
5. Broad, W.J., and Wade, N. (1982). Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon and Schuster.
6. Defining Misconduct. (1992). Nature, 356, 730-731.
7. Edsall. (1975) Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. AAAS Report.
8. Falsification Alleged in Breast Cancer Data: Charges Focus on Tamoxifen Drug Trial. (1995, July 7). Chicago Tribune.
9. Geison, G.L. The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
10. Gordon, S.D. (1992). The Availability of Colleges and Universities for Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federally Funded Grants and Projects. West's Education Law Reporter, 75, 13.
11. Handler, P. (1981). Hearings on Fraud in Biomedical Research. Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the House Committee on Science and Technology, 97th Congress, 1st session, 10-39.
12. Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee's Report: Are Scientific Misconduct and Conflicts of Interest Hazardous to Our Health? H.R. Report No. 101-688, 101st Congress, 2nd session 4 (1990).
13. Kohn, A. (1986) False Prophets. New York: Basil Blackwell.
14. The New York Times. (1995, May 16), 1C.
15. The Pink Sheet. (1984, July 16). FDC Reporter, 46, 29.
16. Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1959.
17. Research Powerhouse Under the Microscope. (1994, June 15). The Chronicle of Higher Education, A24.
18. The San Francisco Chronicle (1993, August 25), A1.
19. Shapiro, M.F., & Charrow, R.D. (1985). Scientific Misconduct in Investigational Drug Trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 312, 731.
20. Simmons, R.L. et al. (1991). Misconduct and Fraud in Research: Social and Legislative Issues Symposium of the Society of University Surgeons. Surgery, 110, 1, 7.
21. Stewart, W.W., and Feder, N. (1987, January 15). The Integrity of the Scientific Literature. Nature, 325, 207-214.
22. Throwing Money at Science Just Creates a Monster. (1995, June 19). Business Week, 46.
23. A University and Four Scientists Must Pay for Pilfered Work. (1995, May 19). The new York Times, A20.
24. Ways and Means. (1994, June 15). The Chronicle of Higher Education, A24.