FUTURESITE: An environmental remediation game-simulation

Simulation and Gaming

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 13-27

  Applegate, John S ^a   Sarno, Douglas J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b Phoenix Environmental Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

Community involvement; Environment; FUTURESITE; Pollution; Public participation; Risk communication; Superfund

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344216514     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046878197281003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baba, N., Uchida, H., & Sawaragi, Y. (1984). A game approach to the acid rain problem. Simulation & Games, 15, 305-314.
2. Brewer, G. D. (1978). Scientific gaming: The development and use of free-form scenarios. Simulations & Games, 9, 309-315.
3. Breyer, S. (1993). Breaking the vicious circle: Toward effective risk regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Centers for Disease Control. (1993, November). The Fernald Dosimetry Reconstruction Project: Tasks 2 and 3 (RAC Report No. CDC-5). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
5. Clark, P. B., & Emrich, W. M. (1980). New tools for resolving environmental disputes: Introducing federal agencies to environmental mediation and related techniques (Report to Council on Environmental Quality and U.S. Geological Survey No. 13). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
6. Dukes, R. L. (1990). Collective action in simulated agrarian and industrial societies. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
7. Exline, C. H., & Larkin, R. P. (1979). Reviewing DEAD RIVER: A simulation game of river restoration. Simulation & Games, 10, 87-90.
8. Federal Facilities Environmental Restoration Dialogue Committee. (1993, February). Recommendations for improving the federal facility environmental restoration decision-making process and setting priorities in the event of funding shortfalls (Interim report). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
9. Fernald Citizens Task Force. (1995, July). Recommendations on remediation levels, waste deposition, priorities, and future use. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
10. Gamson, W. A. (1972). SIMSOC: Establishing social order in a simulated society. In M. Inbar & C. S. Stoll (Eds.), Simulation and gaming in social science (pp. 51-68). New York: Free Press.
11. Greenblat, C. S., & Duke, R. D. (1981). Principles and practices of gaming simulation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12. Inbar, M., & Stoll, C. S. (Eds.). (1972). Simulation and gaming in social science. New York: Free Press.
13. Jones, K. (1985). Designing your own simulations. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc.
14. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kirts, C. A. (1991). The COMMONS game: Its instructional value when used in a natural resources management context. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 5-18.
16. Klabbers, J.H.G. (1989). On the improvement of confidence. In J.H.G. Klabbers, W. J. Scheper, C.A.Th. Takkenberg, & D. Crookall (Eds.), Simulation-gaming: On the improvement of competence in dealing with complexity, uncertainty, and value conflicts. New York: Pergamon Press.
17. Klabbers, J.H.G., Swart, R. J., VanUlden, A. P., & Vellinga, P. (1995). Climate policy: Management of organized complexity through gaming. In D. Crookall & K. Arai (Eds.), Simulation and gaming across disciplines and cultures: ISAGA at a watershed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Kaufman, B. L. (1994, August 6). Games asks Fernald uses. Cincinnati Enquirer, pp. B1, B3.
19. Lederman, L. C. (1992). Debriefing: Towards a systematic theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 145-160.
20. Maidment, R., & Bronstein, R. H. (1973). Simulation games: Design and implementation. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
21. Mautner-Markhof, F. (1995). The reality, management and simulation of complex systems. In D. Crookall & K. Arai (Eds.), Simulation and gaming across disciplines and cultures: ISA GA at a watershed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Marcus, P. A., & Emrich, W. M. (Eds.). (1981). Environmental conflict management. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
23. Raser, J. R. (1969). Simulation and society: An exploration of scientific gaming. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Sharda, R., Willett, K. & Chiang, P. S. (1988). WQM: A water quality management simulation game. Simulation & Games, 19,27-41.
25. Starr, P. (1994). Seductions of sim: Policy and simulation game. The American Prospect, 17, 25.
26. Stem, P. C., Fineberg, H. V. (Eds). (1996). Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Straus, D. B. (1981). Managing complexities. In P. A. Marcus & W. M. Emrich (Eds.), Environmental conflict management (pp. 1-9). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
28. Susskind, L. E. (1994). Overview of developments in public participation. In E. C. Lichtenstein & W. T. Dunn (Eds.), Public participation in environmental decisionmaking (pp. 8-12). Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
29. U.S. Department of Energy, Fernald Environmental Management Project. (1994). 1993 site environmental report. Washington, DC: Author.
30. Wynn, M., Overall, J., Smith, R., Taylor, J., & Totterdill, P. (1982). Teaching and administration. Simulation & Games, 13, 295-298.