Molecular Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Marine ShrimpPenaeus

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 399-407

  Baldwin, John D ^a   Bass, Anna L ^b   Bowen, Brian W ^b   Clark Jr , Wallis H ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PENAEIDAE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GEOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PENAEIDAE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; STATISTICS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0032232984     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0537     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abele L. G., Kim W. An illustrated guide to the marine decapod crustaceans of Florida. State of Florida Dept. Environ. Regul. Tech. Ser. 8:1986.
2. Amos B., Hoelzel A. R. Long-term preservation of whale skin for DNA analysis. Rep. Intl. Whal. Comm. Special Issue. 13:1991;99-103.
3. Avise J. C., Bowen B. W., Lamb T., Meylan A. B., Bermingham E. Mitochondrial DNA evolution at a turtle's pace: Evidence for low genetic variability and reduced microevolutionary rate in the testudines. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:1992;457-473.
4. Bernatchez L. A role for molecular systematics in defining evolutionary significant units in fishes. Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation. 1995;American Fisheries Society, Bethesda. p. 114-132.
5. Bowen B. W., Grant W. S. Phylogeography of the sardines (Sardinops. Evolution. 51:1997;1601-1610.
6. Bowen B. W., Clark A. M., Abreu-Grobois F. A., Chavez A., Reichart H., Ferl R. J. Global phylogeography of the ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys. Genetica. 101:1998;179-189.
7. Bremer K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics. 10:1994;295-304.
8. Briggs J. C. Marine Zoogeography. 1974;McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Briggs J. C. Global Biogeography. 1995;Elsevier, New York.
10. Brown G. G., Simpson M. V. Novel features of animal mtDNA evolution as shown by sequences of two rat cytochrome oxidase subunit II genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 79:1982;3246-3250.
11. Brown W. M., George M. Jr., Wilson A. C. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:1979;1967-1971.
12. Burkenroad M. D. The Penaeidae of Louisiana, with a discussion of their world relationships. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 68:1934;61-143.
13. Burukovsky R. N. Some problems in the systematics and distribution ofPenaeus. Trudy Atlanticheskii Nauchnoissledovatel' skii Institut Rybnogo Khozy aistva; Okeanograft, Kaliningrad. 42:1972;3-21.
14. Capaldi R. A. Structure and function of cytochromec. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:1990;569-596.
15. Crozier R. H., Crozier Y. C., Mackinlay A. G. The CO-I and CO-II region of the honeybee mitochondrial DNA: Evidence for variation in insect mitochondrial evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:1989;399-411.
16. Dall W., Hill B. J., Rothisberg P. C., Sharples D. J. The biology of the Penaeidae. Blaxter J. H. S., Southward A. J. Advances in Marine Biology. 1990;1-489 Academic Press, New York.
17. deBruijn M. H. L. Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 304:1983;234-241.
18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum-likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:1981;368-376.
19. Felsenstein, J. 1993, PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), Dept. Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
20. Garcia-Machado E., Dennebouy N., Suarez M. O., Mounolou J-C., Monnerot M. Partial sequence of the shrimpPenaeus notialis. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sci. Vie. 319:1996;473-486.
21. Grant W. S., Bowen B. W. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: Insights from the sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. J. Heredity. 89:1998;415-426.
22. Greybeal A. The phylogenetic utility of cytochromeb: Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:1993;256-269.
23. Holthuis L. B. Shrimps and prawns of the world. FAO Species Catalogue. 1:1980.
24. Howland D. E., Hewitt G. M. Phylogeny of the Coleptera based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I sequence data. Insect Mol. Biol. 4:1995;203-215.
25. Kim J. Improving the accuracy of phylogenetic estimation by combining different methods. Syst. Biol. 4:1993;331-340.
26. Kocher T. D., Thomas W. K., Meyer A., Edwards S. V., Pääbo S., Villablanca F. X., Wilson A. C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:1989;6196-6200.
27. Kubo I. Studies on the penaeids of Japan and its adjacent waters. J. Tokyo Coll. Fish. 36:1949;1-467.
28. Martin A. P., Naylor G. J. P., Palumbi S. R. Rates of mitochondrial DNA evolution in sharks are slow compared to mammals. Nature. 357:1992;153-155.
29. Mulley J. C., Latter B. D. H. Genetic variation and evolutionary relationships within a group of thirteen species of penaeid prawns. Evolution. 34:1980;904-916.
30. Nei M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. 1987;Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
31. Nelson K., Hedgecock D. Enzyme polymorphism and adaptive strategy in the decapod Crustacea. Am. Natur. 116:1980;238-280.
32. Olsen G. J., Matsuda H., Hagstrom R., Overbeek R. fastDNAml: A tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences using maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:1994;41-48.
33. Palumbi S. R., Benzie J. Large mitochondrial DNA differences between morphologically similar Penaeid shrimp. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1:1991;27-34.
34. Pérez Farfante I. Western Atlantic shrimps of the genusPenaeus. Fish. Bull. US Fish Wildl. Serv. 67:1969;461-591.
35. Proebstel D. S., Evans R. P., Shiozawa D. K., Williams R. N. Preservation of nonfrozen tissue samples from a salmonine fishBrachymystax lenok. J. Ichthyol. 9:1993;9-17.
36. Redfield J. A., Hedgecock D., Nelson K., Salini J. P. Low heterozygosity in tropical marine crustaceans of Australia and the trophic stability hypothesis. Mar. Biol. Lett. 1:1980;303-313.
37. Rosenblatt R. H., Waples R. S. A genetic comparison of allopatric populations of shore fish species from the eastern and central Pacific Ocean: Dispersal or vicariance. Copeia. 1986:1986;275-284.
38. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:1987;406-425.
39. Salini J. P. Genetic variation and population subdivision in the greentail prawnMetapenaeus bennettae. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 38:1987;339-349.
40. Satta Y., Takahata N. Evolution ofDrosophilamelanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:1990;9558-9562.
41. Spicer G. S. Phylogenetic utility of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene: Molecular evolution of theDrosophila buzzatii. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1995;749-759.
42. Sunden S. L. F., Davis S. K. Evaluation of genetic variation in a domestic population ofPenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 97:1991;131-142.
43. Swofford, D. L. 1993, PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
44. Tam Y. K., Chu K. H. Electrophoretic study on the phylogenetic relationships of some of the species ofPenaeusMetapenaeus. J. Crustacean Biol. 13:1993;697-705.
45. Tirmizi N. M. Marsupenaeus,Penaeus. Pakistan J. Zool. 3:1971;193-194.
46. Williams A. B. Shrimp, Lobsters, and Crabs of the Atlantic Coast of the Eastern United States, Maine to Florida. 1984;Random House (Smithsonian Inst. Press), Washington.
47. Wolstenholme D. R. Animal mitochondrial DNA: Structure and evolution. Int. Rev. Cytol. 141:1992;173-216.
48. Yoder A. D., Vilgalys R., Ruvolo M. Molecular evolutionary dynamics of cytochromeb. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;1339-1350.
49. Yu, H. Chan, T. 1986, The Illustrated Penaeoid Prawns of Taiwan, Southern Materials Center, Inc. Taipei, R.O.C.
50. Zhang D-X., Hewitt G. M. Nuclear integrations: Challenges for mitochondrial DNA markers. TREE. 11:1996;247-251.