Ethics in the research context: Misinterpretations and misplaced misgivings

Canadian Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 202-211

  Stark, Cannie ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032220550     PISSN: 07085591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0086809     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aguinas, H. & Handelsman, M.M. (1997a). Ethical issues in the use of the bogus pipeline. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(7), 557-573.
2. Aguinas, H. & Handelsman, M.M. (1997b). The unique ethical challenges of the bogus pipeline methodology: Let the data speak. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(7), 582-587.
3. Azar, E. (1997). Ethics-code changes may dampen research efforts. American scientists are closely watching an ethical debate in Canada that could have implications in the United States. The APA Monitor, 28(3), 27.
4. Caplan, P.J. & Caplan, J.B. (1994). Thinking critically about research on sex and gender. New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.
5. Concar, D. (December 7, 1996). Ethics code spells disaster for Canadian psychologists. New Scientist, 7.
6. Fader, R. (1996). The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments: Reflections on a Presidential Commission. Hastings Center Report, 26(5), 5-10.
7. Gannon, L., Luchetta, T., Rhodes, D., Pardie, L., & Segrist, D. (1992). Sex bias in psychological research: Progress or complacency? American Psychologist, 47, 389-396.
8. Gergen, M.M. (1988). Toward a feminist metatheory and methodology in the social sciences. In M.M. Gergen (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 87-104). New York, NY: New York University Press.
9. Holden, C. (December 6, 1996). Draft research code raises hackles. Science, 274, 1604.
10. Jones, M. (November, 1995). Personal communication.
11. Josselson, R. (Ed.) (1996). Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Medical Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (1997). Code of ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, Ont.: Authors.
13. Medical Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (1998). Tri-Council policy statement on ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, Ont.: Authors.
14. Nicks, S.D., Korn, J.H., & Mainieri, T. (1997). The rise and fall of deception in social psychology and personality research, 1921 to 1994. Ethics & Behavior, 7(1), 69-77.
15. Rollins, J.H. (1996). Women's minds/Women's bodies: The psychology of women in a biosocial context. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Sinclair, C. & Pettifor, J. (Eds.) (1992). Companion Manual to the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists, 1991, Ottawa, Ont.: Canadian Psychological Association.
17. Slater, P.E. (1970). The pursuit of loneliness: American culture at the breaking point. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
18. Stark, C. (1997). Curiouser and curiouser: Blind faith in peer review. Symposium presentation at the Canadian Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, Ont.
19. Stark, C. (submitted). The inclusive university in the New Ice Age: Academic violence and academic freedom.
20. Stark-Adamec, C. & Kimball, M. (1984). Science free of sexism: A psychologist's guide to nonsexist research. Canadian Psychology, 25(1), 23-34.
21. Stark(-Adamec), C. & Pettifor, J. (1995). Ethical decision making for practising social scientists. Ottawa: Social Science Federation of Canada.
22. Stoddart, J. (1995). La science et l'thique: De l'universel au particulier. Interface, 16(1), 5-6.
23. Tri-Council Working Group on Ethics. (1996). Code of conduct for research involving humans: Draft. Ottawa, Ont.: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
24. Veitch, J.A., O'Neill, P., Furedy, J., Stark, C., & Ogloff, J. (submitted). Peer review: Validity, reliability, and fairness in the age of accountability.
25. Walsh, R. T. (1989). Do research reports in mainstream feminist psychology journals reflect feminist values? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 433-444.
26. York University Task Force on Ethical Issues in Research (1992). Interim Report. North York, Ont: Author.