The floral development and floral anatomy of Chrysosplenium alternifolium, an unusual member of the saxifragaceae

Journal of Plant Research

Volumn 111, Issue 1104, 1998, Pages 573-580

  Ronse Decraene, L P ^a   Roels, P ^a   Smets, E F ^a   Backlund, A ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Department of Systematic Botany ^*  (Sweden)

^c TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Colleters ; Floral anatomy ; Floral development ; Obdiplostemony ; Placentation

Indexed keywords

CHRYSOSPLENIUM; CHRYSOSPLENIUM ALTERNIFOLIUM; SAXIFRAGACEAE;

EID: 0032219069     PISSN: 09189440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02507793     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Backlund, A. and Bremer, B. 1997. Phylogeny of the Asteridae s.str. based on rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Dipsacales. Pl. Syst. Evol. 207: 225-254.
2. Baillon, H. 1880. Histoire des Plantes. Hachette et. Cie, Paris.
3. Bensel, C.R. and Palser, B.F. 1975. Floral anatomy in the Saxifragaceae sensu lato. II. Saxifragoideae and Iteaoideae. Amer. J. Bot. 62: 661-675.
4. Davies, G.L. 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Sydney.
5. Donoghue, M.J., Olmstead, R.G., Smith, J.F. and Palmer, J.D. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 333-345.
6. Drude, O. 1879. Ueber die naturliche Verwandschaft von Adoxa und Chrysosplenium. Bot. Zeit. 42: 665-672.
7. Drude, O. 1884. Über die Verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen von Adoxa zu Chrysosplenium und Panax. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 5: 441-447.
8. Eckert, G. 1966. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und blütenantomische Untersuchungen zum Problem der Obdiplostemonie. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 85: 523-604.
9. Eichinger, A. 1907. Vergleichende Entwicklungsgeschichte von Adoxa und Chrysosplenium. Mitt. Bayer. Bot. Ges. 2, 5: 65-74; 2, 6: 81-93.
10. Endress, P.K. 1992. Evolution and floral diversity: the phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: S106-S122.
11. Engler, A. 1930. Saxifragaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl, eds., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 18a, W. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 74-226.
12. Erbar, C. 1994. Contributions to the affinities of Adoxa from the viewpoint of floral development. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 116: 259-282.
13. Erbar, C. and Leins, P. 1989. On the early floral development and the mechanisms of secondary pollen presentation in Campanula, Jasione and Lobelia. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 111: 29-55.
14. Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
15. Eriksson, T. and Donoghue, M.J. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of Sambucus and Adoxa (Adoxoideae, Adoxaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences and preliminary morphological data. Syst. Bot. 22: 555-573.
16. Franchet, M.A. 1890-1891. Monographie du genre Chrysosplenium Tourn. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris) III, 2: 87-114; III, 3: 1-32.
17. Fukuoka, N. 1974. Floral morphology of Adoxa moschatellina. Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. 26: 65-76.
18. Gelius, L. 1967. Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte an Blüten der Saxifragales sensu lato mit besonderer Berucksichtigung des Androeceum. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 87: 253-303.
19. Gornall, R.J. 1986. Trichome anatomy and taxonomy of Saxifraga (Saxifragaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 6: 257-275.
20. Gustafsson, M.G.H., Backlund, A. and Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogeny of the Asterales sensu lato based on rbcL sequences with particular reference to the Goodeniaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 199: 217-242.
21. Hara, H. 1957. Synopsis of the genus Chrysosplenium L. Jour. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. III, Bot. 7: 1-90.
22. Hils, M.H., Dickison, W.C., Lucansky, T.W. and Stern, W.L. 1988. Comparative anatomy and systematics of woody Saxifragaceae: Tetracarpaea. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1687-1700.
23. Hufford, L. 1992. Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 218-248.
24. Hufford, L. 1997. The roles of ontogenetic evolution in the origins of floral homoplasies. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158: S65-S80.
25. Johnson, L.A. and Soltis, D.E. 1994. MatK DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s.s. Syst. Bot. 19: 143-156.
26. Johnson, L.A. and Soltis, D.E. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 149-175.
27. Judd, W.S., Sanders, R.W. and Donoghue, M.J. 1994. Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harv. Pap. Bot. 5: 1-51.
28. Klopfer, K. 1968. Beitrage zur floralen Morphogenese und Histogenese der Saxifragaceae. 2. Die Blütenentwicklung von Tellima grandiflora. Flora 158: 1-21.
29. Klopfer, K. 1970. Beiträge zur floralen Morphogenese und Histogenese der Saxifragaceae. 4. Die Blütenentwicklung einiger Saxifraga-Arten. Flora 159: 347-365.
30. Klopfer, K. 1973. Florale Morphogenese und Taxonomie der Saxifragaceae sensu lato. Feddes Repert. 84: 475-516.
31. Mabberley, D.J. 1990. The Plant-Book. 3th Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Mair, O. 1977. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte monosymmetrischer Dicotylen-Blüten. Diss. Bot. 38: 1-88.
33. Nakazawa, M., Wakabayashi, M., Ono, M. and Murata, J. 1997. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Chrysosplenium (Saxifragaceae) in Japan. J. Plant Res. 110: 265-274.
34. Payer, J.-B. 1857. Organogénie Comparée de la Fleur. Victor Masson, Paris
35. Roels, P., Ronse Decraene, L.P. and Smets, E.F. 1997. A floral ontogenetic investigation of the Hydrangeaceae. Nord. J. Bot. 17: 235-254.
36. Roels, P. and Smets, E.F. 1994. A comparative floral ontogenetical study between Adoxa moschatellina and Sambucus ebulus. Belg. J. Bot. 127: 157-170.
37. Ronse Decraene, L.P. and Smets, E.F. 1994. Merosity in flowers: definition, origin and taxonomic significance. Pl. Syst. Evol. 191: 83-104.
38. Ronse Decraene, L.P. and Smets, E.F. 1995. The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 118: 193-247.
39. Ronse Decraene, L.P. and Smets, E.F. 1996. The morphological variation and systematic value of stamen pairs in the Magnoliatae. Feddes Repert. 107: 1-17.
40. Ronse Decraene, L.P. and Smets, E.F. 1998. Notes on the evolution of androecial organisation in the Magnoliophytina (Angiosperms). Bot. Acta 111: 77-86.
41. Soltis, D.E., Morgan, D.R., Grable, A., Soltis, P.S. and Kuzoff, R. 1993. Molecular systematics of Saxifragaceae sensu stricto. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1056-1081.
42. Soltis, D.E., Xiang, Q.-Y. and Hufford, L. 1995. Relationships and evolution of Hydrangeaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 504-514.
43. Soltis, D.E., Kuzoff, R.K., Conti, E., Gornall, R. and Ferguson, K. 1996. MatK and rbcL gene sequence data indicate that Saxifrage (Saxifragaceae) is polyphyletic. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 371-382.
44. Sprague, T.A. 1927. The morphology and taxonomic position of the Adoxaceae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 47: 471-487.
45. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
46. Thomas, V. 1991. Structural, functional and phylogenetic aspects of the colleter. Ann. Bot. 68: 287-305.
47. Tucker, S.C. 1984. Unidirectional organ initiation in leguminous flowers. Amer. J. Bot. 71: 1139-1148.
48. Tucker, S.C. and Douglas, A.W. 1994. Ontogenetic evidence and phylogenetic relationships among basal taxa of Legumes. In I.K. Ferguson and S.C. Tucker, eds., Advances in Legume Systematics 6: Structural Botany. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 11-32.
49. Tucker, S.C., Douglas, A.W. and Liang, H.-X. 1993. Utility of ontogenetic and conventional characters in determining phylogenetic relationships of Saururaceae and Piperaceae (Piperales). Syst. Bot. 18: 614-641.
50. Vandeputte, E. 1993. Bloemontogenetische observaties en systematische verwantschappen binnen de Saxifragaceae sensu lato. Unpubl. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.